Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a growth disorder variably characterized by neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, macroglossia, hemihyperplasia, omphalocele, embryonal tumors (e.g., Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, neuroblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma), visceromegaly, adrenocortical cytomegaly, renal abnormalities (e.
Macroglossia is an uncommon developmental condition and is also known as hypoglossia. Its defining feature is a rudimentary or an abnormally small tongue. It leads to limited muscular movement and is associated with syndromes such as Hanhart syndrome.
Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) is the most common overgrowth syndrome. The condition was named after American pediatric pathologist John Bruce Beckwith in 1963, and German pediatrician Hans-Rudolf Wiedemann in 1964, reported the syndrome independently.[rx] Etiologically, BWS is a human imprinting disorder caused by genetic and epigenetic changes affecting the regulation of genes on chromosome 11p15 region. It presents with a wide and varied clinical spectrum, which can make the diagnosis challenging in some cases. Among the clinical signs, macrosomia, macroglossia, and abdominal wall defects stand out as the most common features. BWS is also a cancer predisposition syndrome. Thus, early recognition of the condition in the prenatal or neonatal period is critical for monitoring and timely treatment of complications.[2][3]
Causes of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome
The etiology of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome is complex. About 80-90% of patients have a known molecular aberration that affects the regulation of a group of imprinted genes implicated in cell cycle progression and somatic growth control located in the chromosome 11p15.5. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic-regulated process by which only one copy of a gene is expressed depending on the sex of the parent carrying the allele. Two imprinting control regions (IC1 and IC2) regulate the gene expression from the 11p15 region. Normally, methylation (silencing of gene expression) occurs in the paternal allele at IC1 and the maternal allele at IC2. In an individual with BWS, the molecular defects more commonly described are:[rx][rx][rx]
- A congenital vascular malformation extends into the body of the tongue
- Abnormalities in the expression of genes on chromosome 11n cause muscular hyperplasia in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome
- Macroglossia occurs in Hurler syndrome and Hunter syndrome through abnormal glycogen storage
- Abnormal deposition of amyloid protein causes macroglossia in amyloidosis
- Macroglossia results from muscular atrophy and subsequent fatty replacement in myasthenia gravis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
-
Loss of methylation at IC2 on the maternal allele in 50 to 60% of cases
-
Paternal uniparental isodisomy of 11p15 in 20 to 25% of cases
-
The gain of methylation at IC1 on the maternal allele in 5 to 10% of cases
-
Autosomal dominant maternal point mutations in CDKN1C (regulated by IC2) in 5% of sporadic cases and 40% of familial cases
-
Chromosomal rearrangements (duplications, translocations, deletions or inversions) in less than 1% of cases
-
The unknown molecular defect in 10 to 15% of cases
Symptoms of Macroglossia/Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome
The clinical features of macroglossia vary according to the underlying cause and can range from mild to severe.
- The enlarged tongue extends beyond the teeth or alveolar ridge at rest.
- The tip of the tongue can often be extended to the nose and chin.
- Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, hypothyroidism, and acromegaly cause generalized enlargement of the tongue with a smooth surface.
- Amyloidosis, neurofibromatosis, and multiple endocrine neoplasias, type 2B, cause generalized enlargement with a multinodular surface.
- A lymphatic malformation causes focal enlargement with a pebbly surface and multiple vesicle-like blebs.
- A tumour or a proliferative haemangioma causes focal enlargement.
- Hemihypertrophy describes unilateral enlargement.
Diagnosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome
History and Physical
BWS is a complex multisystem disorder that presents in a wide and varied clinical spectrum. For a better understanding of the historical features and physical findings likely to encounter in BWS patients, this section is divided according to the presentation of the syndrome in the different stages of life.
-
Prenatal stage – common complications in pregnancies with BWS fetuses usually start after the 22 weeks of gestation with gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, vaginal bleeding, polyhydramnios, macrosomic fetus, increased alpha-fetoprotein, and ultrasonographic findings of organomegaly. During birth, patients may present with macrosomia-related complications (e.g., cephalohematoma, brachial plexus injury), premature birth, and placentomegaly. A positive family history of BWS is another important consideration since approximately 15% of cases could be attributed to familial transmission, although it is important to point out that most cases are sporadic.[rx][rx]
-
Neonatal period – neonates with BWS may present with macrosomia, whole body hemihypertrophy, limb length discrepancy, distinctive facial appearance, abdominal wall defects (omphalocele, umbilical hernia, or diastasis recti), organomegaly (could involve liver, kidneys, spleen, pancreas, thymus, heart, and adrenal glands), nephrological abnormalities (kidney malformations +/- hydronephrosis), cardiac anomalies (patent ductus arteriosus, patent foramen ovale, and congenital long QT syndrome), and hypotonia. Typical dysmorphic facies in BWS include prominent eyes, infraorbital creases, midfacial hypoplasia, macroglossia (most common feature), prognathism, anterior earlobe creases, posterior helical pits, and nevus flammeus at the glabella. Other physical findings are cleft palate, supernumerary nipples, polydactyly, and genital abnormalities (cryptorchidism). Neonatal BWS is also characterized by hypoglycemia, most likely secondary to islet cell hyperplasia and hyperinsulinism.[rx][rx][rx]
-
Infancy, childhood, and Adolescence – typical features of BWS facies are usually lost in later childhood. Regarding growth parameters, height and weight usually remain around the 90th percentile while head circumference remains around the 50th percentile. Development is, most of the time, not affected unless specific 11p15.5 duplication or perinatal complications were present. Nephrocalcinosis, nephrolithiasis, renal cysts, and recurrent urinary tract infections are common nephrological complications that could develop during infancy to adolescence. Predisposition to embryonal tumors development is one of the most fear characteristics of BWS, for which long-term monitoring is warranted. The most common malignancies reported are Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma, while others include neuroblastoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma.[rx][rx][rx]
-
Adulthood – Most of the features derived from their pediatric phenotype. Adult height usually ends in the normal range, although some studies report an increased mean adult height in the BWS population. Limb length discrepancy can persist or even worsen, leading to scoliosis. Fertility issues have been reported in males as a primary testicular dysfunction or consequence of cryptorchidism; insufficient data is available for females.[rx][rx]
The diagnosis of BWS is established based on clinical criteria and may be confirmed by molecular/cytogenetic testing. However, given the heterogeneous presentation of this disorder, no consensus exists, and most experts agree that these criteria should not replace clinical judgment on a case-by-case basis. In the same line, negative diagnostic testing cannot rule out BWS.
Clinical Diagnosis
There are several published diagnosis criteria for BWS.[rx][rx] Recent reviews consider it acceptable to guide the clinical diagnosis based on the presence of major and minor findings of BWS. The presence of at least three major findings, or two major and one or more minor findings would support the diagnosis of BWS.[rx][rx][rx]
Major Findings
Abdominal wall defect: omphalocele or umbilical hernia
-
Macroglossia
-
Neonatal macrosomia (birth weight more than 90 percentile)
-
Postnatal overgrowth (height/length more than 90 percentile)
-
Embryonal tumors (Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, adrenal tumors, neuroblastoma)
-
Outer ear malformations (anterior ear creases, posterior helical pits)
-
Visceromegaly
-
Cytomegaly of the adrenal fetal cortex
-
Hemihypertrophy
-
Anomalies of the kidney and ureter (e.g., medullary dysplasia, nephrocalcinosis, medullary sponge kidney, and nephromegaly)
-
Positive family history of BWS
-
Cleft palate
Minor Findings
-
Polyhydramnios
-
Enlarged placenta, placental mesenchymal dysplasia
-
Thickened umbilical cord
-
Prematurity
-
Neonatal hypoglycemia
-
Nevus flammeus at the glabella
-
Distinctive facies
-
Cardiomegaly, cardiac anomalies, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
-
Diastasis recti
-
Polydactyly
-
Supernumerary nipples
-
Advanced bone age
Novel diagnostic criteria consider the predictive value of each BWS feature. Brioude et al. (2018) proposed a clinical scoring system based on cardinal features (macroglossia, omphalocele, lateralized overgrowth, bilateral Wilms tumor, hyperinsulinism, adrenal cytomegaly or placental mesenchymal dysplasia) and suggestive features (birth weight greater than two standard deviations above the mean, facial nevus simplex, polyhydramnios or placentomegaly, ear creases or pits, transient hypoglycemia, embryonal tumors, nephromegaly or hepatomegaly, and umbilical hernia or diastasis recti). The scoring consist of adding 2 points for each cardinal feature present, and 1 point for each suggestive feature. A total score of 4 or more would confirm a diagnosis of BWS even without the need for testing. A score of 2 or 3 would warrant genetic testing. Finally, a score of less than two would not meet the criteria for testing.[rx][rx]
Molecular Diagnosis
As previously stated, given the wide variety of molecular aberrations that are behind the etiology of BWS, as well as the mosaicism affecting different tissues in the same individual, the molecular diagnosis of this condition requires a multistep approach, and a negative test cannot exclude the diagnosis. Testing is usually performed on DNA derived from blood-leukocytes; however, samples from buccal swabs, skin fibroblasts, or mesenchymal-derived cells from surgical resections and/or excisions of hyperplastic tissues, could be used to improve the detection. Different testing approaches have been recommended. The most widely used tests are the following:[rx][rx]
-
Methylation analysis – consider first-line testing since methylation alteration could be detected in most cases of BWS with known molecular etiology. Further studies such as copy number variant (CNV) testing might be needed to determine the exact molecular mechanism.
-
Sequencing analysis, or gene-targeted sequencing – test to be considered if methylation analysis is negative. Useful in the detection of pathogenic variants of genes in the 11p.15 region, specially CDKN1C mutations.
-
Chromosomal microarray, SNP array, or microsatellite analysis – could detect microdeletions, microduplications, or length of paternal uniparental disomy region of chromosome 11.
-
Karyotype or FISH – could detect chromosomal defects associated with BWS such as duplication, inversion, or translocation of 11p15.5.
Prenatal Diagnosis
- If there is a positive family history of BWS or the presence of prenatal features, genetic counseling is warranted, and testing could be offered. Methylation analysis and CDKN1C sequencing are the preferred diagnostic tests in these situations. Regardless of any positive or negative result, postnatal testing is needed for confirmation.[rx][rx]
Treatment of Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome
The management of patients with BWS entails a qualified lead health-care provider to oversee the coordination for the care of the patient, following a holistic approach. Once a diagnosis of BWS is made or even suspected, anticipatory medical management is required, as well as a comprehensive plan that includes standard supportive medical and surgical care, as necessary. Given the high heterogenicity and the variable degree of the features when present, treatment indications should be customized for each specific patient.[rx][rx][rx][rx]
-
Prenatal management – in suspected or confirmed cases, it is important to anticipate possible fetal or maternal complications (maternal pre-eclampsia, congenital anomalies, macrosomia-related complications, postnatal hypoglycemia), and provide adequate care. Delivery should be planned to occur in an institution with a neonatal intensive care unit.
-
Management of hypoglycemia – glucose monitoring should be performed for the first 48 hours of life. If hypoglycemia is detected, the newborn should be transferred to a neonatal intensive care unit for management as per general guidelines. If no hypoglycemia is detected, fasting tests, including glucose, insulin, and ketones, are recommended at 48 hours of life and prior to nursery discharge. Severe persistent hyperinsulinism warrants further investigation.
-
Management of growth anomalies – growth should be routinely monitored using growth charts specific modified for BWS patients. Interventions for possible tall stature could be considered. Lateralized overgrowth should be monitored clinically, at least once a year. If a leg-length discrepancy is encountered, referral to a pediatric orthopedic surgeon is warranted; on the contrary, an arm-length discrepancy is generally monitored clinically with no indication for surgical correction.
-
Management of macroglossia – feeding problems requires the involvement of feeding specialists and dietitians. For suspected airway obstruction, careful evaluation, including sleep studies and consultations to pulmonologist and ear, nose, and throat specialists, are needed. Tongue-reduction surgery is indicated if there are macroglossia-related complications such as feeding difficulties, persistent drooling, speech difficulties, dental malocclusion, and appearance-related psychosocial problems, usually performed after the age of 1 year, or earlier in cases of severe airway obstruction.
-
Management of abdominal wall defects – there are no additional specific recommendations than the general guidelines for these conditions.
-
Management of cardiac anomalies – a baseline clinical cardiovascular examination is necessary at diagnosis. If anomalies are detected or suspected, referral to a cardiologist specialist for assessment and echocardiography is required. Annual evaluation and electrocardiogram are recommended for patients with a known molecular aberration involving the IC2 region.
-
Management of renal complications – clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation for nephrological anomalies is needed at diagnosis and at the time of adult transition. If anomalies are detected, referral to nephrologist and urologist is necessary. Nephrocalcinosis and renal stones should also be monitored along with abdominal surveillance for tumor screening.[12][13]
-
Management and monitoring of embryonal tumors – BWS is a recognized cancer predisposition syndrome, with an estimated tumor risk of 8-10% the first decade of life, with the highest incidence during the first 2 years of life. Different tumor screening protocols have been proposed with common goals of early detection, reducing morbidity, and increasing survival. The protocol of tumor surveillance used in the USA includes the performance of abdominal ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at diagnosis, then every 3 months until age 4 years. Thereafter, only ultrasound screening should be continued every 3-4 months until the age of 7 years. Abdominal ultrasound screening covers the most common associated tumors, including Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and adrenal carcinoma. AFP is specifically used for monitoring of hepatoblastoma; however, it has been involved in recent controversies due to the presence of higher levels of this marker in BWS infants which obscure its interpretation, and the implications of repeated venipuncture. Even though certain molecular defects have more predisposition to certain types of cancer, it is recommended to apply the protocol to all BWS patients regardless of the molecular subtype.[rx]
-
Management of neurological features – cognitive development is usually normal, but monitoring by a pediatrician is recommended, especially if perinatal complications (prematurity, birth trauma, neonatal hypoglycemia) or chromosomal anomalies are present.
-
Monitoring of late-onset complications – a comprehensive evaluation at age 16-18 years is recommended to detect any complication that would require follow up by adult health-care services. Genetic counseling should be offered for family-planning advice.
Who gets macroglossia?
Macroglossia is most often diagnosed in infants and children [1]. The prevalence of congenital macroglossia was reported to be fewer than 5 per 100,000 births, twice as common in females than males, and twice as common in African Americans compared to those of European ancestry.
True macroglossia can be congenital or acquired.
Conditions associated with congenital true macroglossia include :
- Vascular malformation
- Lymphatic malformation
- Infantile haemangioma
- Idiopathic muscular hypertrophy and hemihypertrophy
- Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome
- Mucopolysaccharidoses (Hunter syndrome and Hurler syndrome)
- Becker muscular dystrophy and Duchenne muscular dystrophy
- Neurofibromatosis type 1
- Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B.
Acquired macroglossia is usually due to metabolic or inflammatory conditions, such as:
- Systemic amyloidosis
- Hypothyroidism
- Acromegaly
- Trauma and surgical procedures
- Radiation therapy
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Relative macroglossia is commonly due to Down syndrome. It can also occur because of tonsillar hypertrophy or a tumour which pushes the tongue forwards, or reduced oral cavity volume from a low palatal vault.
References