Category Archive Health A – Z

ByRx Harun

Procidentia – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment

Procidentia/Rectal Prolapse is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. Complete or full-thickness rectal prolapse is the protrusion of all of the rectal wall through the anal canal if the rectal wall has prolapsed but does not protrude through the anus, it is called an occult (internal) rectal prolapse or a rectal intussusception []. Full-thickness rectal prolapse should be distinguished from mucosal prolapse in which there is protrusion of only the rectal or anal mucosa [].

Rectal prolapse refers specifically to the prolapse of some or all of the rectal mucosa through the external anal sphincter. In pediatric populations aged between infancy and age 4, rectal prolapse is usually a self-limiting condition, responding to conservative management. The highest incidence of rectal prolapse has been noted in the first year of life. However, children presenting after age 4 usually have a chronic condition predisposing them to have developed rectal prolapse. In some cases, the prolapse may persist indefinitely, requiring surgical intervention.

Types of Procidentia

  • External (complete) rectal prolapse – (rectal procidentia, full-thickness rectal prolapse, external rectal prolapse) is a full-thickness, circumferential, true intussusception of the rectal wall which protrudes from the anus and is visible externally.
  • Internal rectal intussusception – (occult rectal prolapse, internal procidentia) can be defined as a funnel-shaped infolding of the upper rectal (or lower sigmoid) wall that can occur during defecation.[rx] This infolding is perhaps best visualized as folding a sock inside out,[rx] creating “a tube within a tube”.[rx] Another definition is “where the rectum collapses but does not exit the anus”.[rx]
  • Rectal prolapse (procidentia)It is a full-thickness – circumferential intussusception of the entire rectal wall through the anal canal resulting in part of the rectum remaining intermittently or occasionally permanently distal to the anus. The latter condition is known as third-degree prolapse and the former state as a second degree.
  • Internal intussusception – It is an invagination of part or the entire rectum into itself without any external component, also known as 1° rectal prolapse.
  • Mucosal prolapse (partial rectal mucosal prolapse) refers to the prolapse of the loosening of the submucosal attachments to the muscular propria of the distal rectummucosal layer of the rectal wall. Most sources define mucosal prolapse as an external, segmental prolapse which is easily confused with prolapsed (3rd or 4th degree) hemorrhoids (piles). However, both internal mucosal prolapse (see below) and circumferential mucosal prolapse are described by some.[rx] Others do not consider mucosal prolapse a true form of rectal prolapse.[rx]
  • Internal mucosal prolapse (rectal internal mucosal prolapse, RIMP) – refers to the prolapse of the mucosal layer of the rectal wall which does not protrude externally. There is some controversy surrounding this condition as to its relationship with hemorrhoidal disease, or whether it is a separate entity.[rx] The term “mucosal hemorrhoidal prolapse” is also used.[rx]
  • Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS, solitary rectal ulcer, SRU) – occurs with internal rectal intussusception and is part of the spectrum of rectal prolapse conditions.[rx] It describes ulceration of the rectal lining caused by repeated frictional damage as the internal intussusception is forced into the anal canal during straining. SRUS can be considered a consequence of internal intussusception, which can be demonstrated in 94% of cases.
  • Mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS) – is recognized by some. It includes solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, rectal prolapse, proctitis cystica profunda, and inflammatory polyps. It is classified as a chronic benign inflammatory disorder.

There are three types of rectal prolapse

  • Full-thickness – The full thickness of the wall of the rectum sticks out through the anus. This is the most common type of rectal prolapse. There can be a partial or complete protrusion.
  • Mucosal – Only the lining of the anus (known as the mucosa) sticks out through the anus.
  • Internal – The rectum folds in on itself but does not stick out through the anus.

Patients were considered to be constipated if they had two or fewer bowel actions per week or strained for more than 25% of the time spent defecating. Incontinence of feces was graded according to Park’s classification [] into: –

  • Grade 4 = Incontinence for solid stool.
  • Grade 3 = Incontinence for liquid and flatus.
  • Grade 2 = Incontinence for flatus only.
  • Grade 1 = Normal.

or

Rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception have been classified according to the size of the prolapsed section of the rectum, a function of rectal mobility from the sacrum and infolding of the rectum. This classification also takes into account sphincter relaxation:

  • Grade I – nonrelaxation of the sphincter mechanism (anismus)
  • Grade II – mild intussusception
  • Grade III – moderate intussusception
  • Grade IV – severe intussusception
  • Grade V – rectal prolapse

Rectal internal mucosal prolapse has been graded according to the level of descent of the intussusceptum, which was predictive of symptom severity:[rx]

  • First-degree prolapse – is detectable below the anorectal ring on straining
  • Second degree – when it reached the dentate line
  • Third-degree – when it reached the anal verge

Pathogenesis of Procidentia

Etiologic factors: 1) congenital, 2) acquired.

  • At the beginning of the century Moschcowitz () described the anatomical basis for a rectal prolapse as a deficient pelvic floor through which the rectum herniates. This theory was that a redundant sigmoid colon lying within the deep pelvic sac, together with the resulting acute rectosigmoid junction, caused the patient to strain excessively to evacuate. Thus, the hypothesis continued, the eventual prolapse was the result of herniation through the weakened pelvic floor.
  • A latter concept suggested that rectal prolapse was actually a circumferential 2° or 3° intussusception (). Complete circumferential intussusception usually starts 6–8 cm from the anal verge but can continue through the anal canal ().

Predisposing and associated anatomical and functional factors:

  • Anatomical factors include female sex, redundant rectosigmoid, a deep pouch of Douglas, patulous anus (weak internal sphincter), diastasis of levator ani muscle (defects in the pelvic floor), lack of fixation of the rectum to the sacrum. Functional factors include poor bowel habits (chronic constipation), neurologic disease including congenital anomaly, cauda equina lesion, spinal cord injury, and senility.
  • The majority of patients are women () and peak occurrence is in the sixth decade of life. Rectal prolapse is relatively uncommon in men; moreover, they usually present when they are less than 50 years of age.

Causes of Procidentia

A variety of things can cause the condition, including:

  • The long-term history of diarrhea or constipation
  • The long-term history of having to strain when you poop
  • Old age, which weakens muscles and ligaments in the rectal area
  • Previous injury to the anal or hip area
  • Nerve damage that affects your muscles’ ability to tighten and loosen.
  • The long-term history of straining during bowel movements
  • Older age – Muscles and ligaments in the rectum and anus naturally weaken with age. Other nearby structures in the pelvis area also loosen with age, which adds to the general weakness in that area of the body.
  • Weakening of the anal sphincter – This is the specific muscle that controls the release of stool from the rectum.
  • Earlier injury to the anal or pelvic areas
  • Damage to nerves – If the nerves that control the ability of the rectum and anus muscles to contract (shrink) are damaged, rectal prolapse can result. Nerve damage can be caused by pregnancy, difficult vaginal childbirth, anal sphincter paralysis, spinal injury, back injury/back surgery and/or other surgeries of the pelvic area.
  • Other diseases, conditions and infections – Rectal prolapse can be a consequence of diabetes, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hysterectomy, and infections in the intestines caused by parasites – such as pinworms and whipworms – and diseases resulting from poor nutrition or from difficulty digesting foods.

Since rectal prolapse itself causes functional obstruction, more straining may result from a small prolapse, with increasing damage to the anatomy. This excessive straining may be due to predisposing pelvic floor dysfunction (e.g. obstructed defecation) and anatomical factors

  • Abnormally low descent of the peritoneum covering the anterior rectal wall
  • poor posterior rectal fixation, resulting in loss of posterior fixation of the rectum to the sacral curve[rx]
  • loss of the normal horizontal position of the rectum with lengthening (redundant rectosigmoid)[rx][rx] and downward displacement of the sigmoid and rectum
  • long rectal mesentery[rx]
  • a deep cul-de-sac
  • levator diastasis
  • a patulous, weak anal sphincter

Some authors question whether these abnormalities are the cause, or secondary to the prolapse. Other predisposing factors/associated conditions include:

  • pregnancy[rx] (although 35% of women who develop rectal prolapse are nulliparous)[rx] (have never given birth)
  • previous surgery[rx] (30-50% of females with the condition underwent previous gynecological surgery)[rx]
  • pelvic neuropathies and neurological disease[rx]
  • high gastrointestinal helminth loads (e.g. Whipworm)
  • COPD
  • cystic fibrosis

Symptoms of Procidentia

Additional symptoms of rectal prolapse can include

  • Feeling a bulge outside your anus
  • Seeing a red mass outside your anal opening
  • Pain in the anus or rectum
  • Bleeding from the rectum
  • Leaking blood, poop, or mucus from the anus
  • history of a protruding mass.[rx]
  • degrees of fecal incontinence, (50-80% of patients) which may simply present as a mucous discharge.[rx]
  • constipation (20-50% of patients) also described as tenesmus (a sensation of incomplete evacuation of stool) and obstructed defecation.[rx]
  • a feeling of bearing down.[rx]
  • rectal bleeding[rx]
  • diarrhea and erratic bowel habits.

Diagnosis of Procidentia

Anything that increases your chance of getting a disease is called a risk factor. Having a risk factor does not mean that you will get rectal prolapse; not having risk factors doesn’t mean that you will not get cancer. Talk to your doctor if you think you may be at risk for rectal prolapse

  • Having a family history of colon or rectal prolapse in a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or child).
  • Having a personal history of rectal prolapse of the colon, rectum, or ovary.
  • Having a personal history of high-risk adenomas (colorectal polyps that are 1 centimeter or larger in size or that have cells that look abnormal under a microscope).
  • Having inherited changes in certain genes that increase the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
  • Having a personal history of chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease for 8 years or more.
  • Having three or more alcoholic drinks per day.
  • Smoking cigarettes.
  • Being black.
  • Being obese.

Older age is the main risk factor for most rectal prolapse. The chance of getting rectal prolapse increases as you get older.

Tests that examine the rectum and colon are used to detect (find) and diagnose rectal cancer

Tests used to diagnose rectal prolapse include the following:

  • Physical exam and history – An exam of the body to check general signs of health, including checking for signs of disease, such as lumps or anything else that seems unusual. A history of the patient’s health habits and past illnesses and treatments will also be taken.
  • Digital rectal exam (DRE) – An exam of the rectum. The doctor or nurse inserts a lubricated, gloved finger into the lower part of the rectum to feel for lumps or anything else that seems unusual. In women, the vagina may also be examined.
  • Anal electromyography (EMG) – This test determines if nerve damage is the reason why the anal sphincters are not working properly. It also examines the coordination between the rectum and anal muscles.
  • Anal manometry – This test studies the strength of the anal sphincter muscles. A short, thin tube, inserted up into the anus and rectum, is used to measure the sphincter tightness.
  • Anal ultrasound – This test helps evaluate the shape and structure of the anal sphincter muscles and surrounding tissue. In this test, a small probe is inserted up into the anus and rectum to take images of the sphincters.
  • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency test – This test measures the function of the pudendal nerves, which are involved in bowel control.
  • Proctography (also called defecography) – This test is done in the radiology department. In this test, an X-ray video is taken that shows how well the rectum is functioning. The video shows how much stool the rectum can hold, how well the rectum holds the stool, and how well the rectum releases the stool.
  • Colonoscopy – A procedure to look inside the rectum and colon for polyps (small pieces of bulging tissue), abnormal areas, or cancer. A colonoscope is a thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing. It may also have a tool to remove polyps or tissue samples, which are checked under a microscope for signs of cancer.
  • Biopsy – The removal of cells or tissues so they can be viewed under a microscope to check for signs of rectal prolapse. Tumor tissue that is removed during the biopsy may be checked to see if the patient is likely to have the gene mutation that causes HNPCC. This may help to plan treatment. The following tests may be used:
  • Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) test – A laboratory test in which the amount of a genetic substance called mRNA made by a specific gene is measured. An enzyme called reverse transcriptase is used to convert a specific piece of RNA into a matching piece of DNA, which can be amplified (made in large numbers) by another enzyme called DNA polymerase. The amplified DNA copies help tell whether a specific mRNA is being made by a gene. RT–PCR can be used to check the activation of certain genes that may indicate the presence of rectal prolapse cells. This test may be used to look for certain changes in a gene or chromosome, which may help diagnose rectal prolapse.
  • Immunohistochemistry – A laboratory test that uses antibodies to check for certain antigens (markers) in a sample of a patient’s tissue. The antibodies are usually linked to an enzyme or a fluorescent dye. After the antibodies bind to a specific antigen in the tissue sample, the enzyme or dye is activated, and the antigen can then be seen under a microscope. This type of test is used to help diagnose cancer and to help tell one type of cancer from another type of cancer.
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay – A test that measures the level of CEA in the blood. CEA is released into the bloodstream from both rectal prolapse and normal cells. When found in higher than normal amounts, it can be a sign of rectal prolapse or other conditions.
  • Anorectal manometry – measures and assesses the anal sphincter (internal and external) and rectal pressure and its function. This method is used to evaluate patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. It can directly measure the luminal pressure, including the high-pressure zone, resting pressure, squeezing pressure, rectal sensation/compliance, and the anorectal inhibitory reflex.
  • Defecating proctography/Defecography – A study using X-ray imaging to evaluate anatomic defects of the anorectal region and function of the puborectalis muscle. A contrast filled paste gets initially introduced to the rectum, and the patient is instructed to defecate in a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, tensing of the abdomen, and evacuation).
  • Balloon capacity and compliance test – Evaluates the function of the rectum using a device (plastic catheter with a latex balloon attached), which is inserted into the rectum and gradually filled with warm water. During this process, the volume and pressure are measured.
  • Balloon evacuation study – This test is similar to the balloon capacity and compliance test in which a catheter with a small balloon gets inserted into the rectum and filled with water. Different volumes of water get loaded inside the balloon, and the patient is instructed to evacuate the balloon. This procedure is done to evaluate the opening of the anal canal and to assess the relaxation of the pelvic floor.
  • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency – A probe designed to stimulate and record nerve activity is placed on the physician’s gloved finger, which is then inserted into the rectum to measure pudendal nerve activity (latency to contraction of the anal sphincter muscle). The pudendal nerve innervates the anal sphincter muscles; therefore, this test can be used to assess any injury to that nerve.
  • Electromyography – A test to measure the ability of the puborectalis muscle and sphincter muscles to relax properly. An electrode is placed inside the rectum, and the activity of these muscles gets evaluated throughout a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, and evacuation).
  • Endoanal Ultrasonography – The use of ultrasound imaging to examine rectal lesions, defects, or injuries to the surrounding tissues.
  • Suction rectal biopsy – Gold standard for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. A biopsy is taken two cm above the dentate line, and the absence of ganglion cells on histology confirms the diagnosis. Hypertrophic nerve fibers may be present in addition to this finding.
  • Contrast enema – Used as one of the diagnostic methods for Hirschsprung disease. Useful for localization of the aganglionic segment by looking for a narrowed rectum. Diagnostic confirmation is via a rectal biopsy.

Treatment of Procidentia

  • Activity – Typically, the child is encouraged to walk around as soon as possible.
  • Diet –  Patients are started on liquids after their surgery then advanced to a general diet.
  • Antibiotics –  To help prevent or treat an infection caused by bacteria.
  • Anti-nausea medicine –  To control vomiting (throwing up).
  • Pain medicine –  Pain medicine can include acetaminophen (Tylenol®), ibuprofen (Motrin®), or narcotics. These medicines can be given by vein or by mouth.
  • Stool softeners –  Polyethylene glycol (Miralax), Docusate (Colace) or senna are among the medications used to avoid straining after surgery.

Therapy

  • Management of rectal prolapse is surgical; over 100 different procedures have been described. The existence of so many surgical options is an attestation to the lack of uniform success associated with any one single procedure. Since no procedure is a panacea, the operation selected should be matched to the physiologic condition of the patient.

Transabdominal

  • Transabdominal repairs involve rectal fixation, rectal resection or a combination of resection and fixation. Attachment of the rectum to the sacrum can be performed using foreign material or sutures although the lateral rectal attachments can be achieved to the sacral periosteum without foreign material.
  • The primary advantages of a transabdominal procedure are the lower recurrence rates and the associated improvements in incontinence as well as the preservation of a rectal reservoir. Disadvantages are that they are a more invasive procedures and do have an associated risk of postoperative sexual dysfunction in males.

Anterior rectopexy (Ripstein procedure)

  • The rectum is completely mobilized posteriorly. A loose sung of mesh is wrapped around the anterior wall of the rectum and sutured to the sacrum.
  • Results: Recurrence varies form 0 to 10% (, ). Sling complications are noted in as many as 16.5% of patients with a 4% reoperation rate.

Posterior sling rectopexy (Wells procedure)

  • After posterior rectal mobilization and fixation of a mesh to the sacral hollow, the mesh is wrapped around the lateral aspects while the anterior rectal wall is left free to prevent stricture.
  • Results: Recurrence rates for anterior and posterior rectopexy are similar. However, the rate of stricture and therefore postoperative constipation may be lower after posterior than after anterior rectopexy.

Anterior resection without fixation

  • After anterior resection – the rectum becomes secondarily scarred and therefore adherent to the sacrum.
  • Advantages – removal of the redundant colon may prevent volvulus and torsion and may ameliorate some bowel complaints, especially constipation.
  • Disadvantages – Risk for anastomotic leak.
  • Results – Recurrence rate 9% (). Deterioration of continence has been reported in 10–20% () of patients.

Resection with sacral fixation

  • Fixation of the distal rectal segment to the sacrum with redundant sigmoid extirpation.
  • Results: Initial reports stated recurrence rates of 2–9% (). Bowel control is more likely to be improved when compared to other methods. The procedure is comparable to rectopexy with respect to operative morbidity but postoperative constipation is less likely (). Division of the lateral ligaments decreases recurrence rates but increases the incidence of postoperative constipation.

Suture Rectopexy

  • Perhaps the simplest abdominal approach is rectopexy. The rectum is mobilized distally down to the levator ani muscles. The mesentery of the rectum and the muscular are secured to the sacral fascia or bone.
  • Results: Recurrence rates are reported in 2–5% (, ). However, a redundant sigmoid colon may at least theoretically cause the onset of or exacerbate preexisting constipation.

Laparoscopy

  • Sutured rectopexy, mesh rectopexy, and anterior resection or resection rectopexy are all technically feasible laparoscopic approaches. So far controlled trials have not been performed and long-term recurrence data are not yet available. Small series suggest that morbidity and short term recurrence rates are similar to these reported by laparotomy.

Perineal procedures

  • Perineal procedures are associated with a higher recurrence rate than abdominal procedures. In addition, postoperative incontinence may be exacerbated (). However, the benefits are related to avoiding a laparotomy and include very low morbidity and negligible disability. These operations can be done under general, regional or occasionally local anesthesia.

Altemeier operation (perineal proctosigmoidectomy)

Perineal resection of the full thickness of the prolapsed segment with coloanal anastomosis.

  • Results: Recurrence rates can reach up to 50%. Additional plication of the levator ani muscles seems to be associated with a lower incidence of recurrence and better functional outcome (). The addition of a colonic J pouch has been attempted but no results have been reported to date.

Delorme Procedure

Unlike the perineal rectosigmoidectomy the dissection is within the submucosal layer. The mucosa and the submucosa are excised and the denuded muscularis is longitudinally pleated prior to effecting the anastomosis.

  • Results: Recurrence varies from 7 to 22% ().

Encirclement procedures

  • These operations are no longer used as they fail to eliminate the prolapse or to improve incontinence. Moreover high rates of infection, implant extrusion and stenosis with associated prolapse incarceration have been noted.

The most common types of surgery

  • Through the abdomen – This type of surgery can be done either with a large incision or using laparoscopy — this process uses small cuts and a camera attached to an instrument so the surgeon can see what needs to be done and if there are any additional issues that need to be fixed.
  • Rectal repair – This approach may be used if you are older or have other medical problems. This type of surgery can involve the inner lining of the rectum or the portion of the rectum extending out of the anus.
  • Altemeier procedure – In this procedure — also called a perineal proctosigmoidectomy — the portion of the rectum extending out of the anus is cut off (amputated) and the two ends are sewn back together. The remaining structures that help support the rectum are stitched back together in an attempt to provide better support.
  • Delorme procedure – In this procedure, only the inner lining of the fallen rectum is removed. The outer layer is then folded and stitched and the cut edges of the inner lining are stitched together so that rectum is now inside the anal canal.
  • Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery – Also done through the abdomen, this procedure uses several smaller incisions. The surgeon inserts special surgical tools and a tiny camera through the abdominal incisions to repair the rectal prolapse. An emerging robotic approach uses a robot to perform the operation.
  • Rectal prolapse repair through the area around the anus (perineal rectosigmoidectomy) – During the more commonly performed form of this procedure (Altemeier procedure), the surgeon pulls the rectum through the anus, removes a portion of the rectum and sigmoid and attaches the remaining rectum to the large intestine (colon). This repair is typically reserved for those who are not candidates for open or laparoscopic repair

Home Care (“What do I need to do once my child goes home?”)

  • Diet –  Your child may eat a normal diet after surgery. Avoid constipating foods such as dairy products, rice and bananas.
  • Activity –  Your child should avoid strenuous activity and heavy lifting for the first 1-2 weeks after laparoscopic surgery, 4-6 weeks after open surgery.
  • Wound care –  Surgical incisions should be kept clean and dry for a few days after surgery. Most of the time, the stitches used in children are absorbable and do not require removal. Your surgeon will give you specific guidance regarding wound care, including when your child can shower or bathe.
  • Medicines – Medicines for pain such as acetaminophen (Tylenol®l) or ibuprofen (Motrin® or Advil®) or something stronger like a narcotic may be needed to help with pain for a few days after surgery. Stool softeners and laxatives are needed to help regular stooling after surgery, especially if narcotics are still needed for pain.
  • What to call the doctor for – Call your doctor for worsening belly pain, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, problems with urination, or if the wounds are red or draining fluid.
  • Follow-up care – Your child should follow up with his or her surgeon 2-3 weeks after surgery to ensure proper post-operative healing.

Long-Term Outcomes (“Are there future conditions to worry about?”)

  • The long-term prognosis for children with rectal prolapse is good. More than 90 percent of children who experience rectal prolapse between nine months and three years of age will respond to medical treatment and will not require surgery.
  • Children who develop rectal prolapse after the age of four are more likely to have underlying neurologic or muscular defects of the pelvis. These children are less likely to respond to medical treatments and should be seen early for surgical intervention.

References

ByRx Harun

What Is Rectal Prolapse? – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

What Is Rectal Prolapse?/Rectal Prolapse or procidentia is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. Complete or full-thickness rectal prolapse is the protrusion of all of the rectal wall through the anal canal if the rectal wall has prolapsed but does not protrude through the anus, it is called an occult (internal) rectal prolapse or a rectal intussusception []. Full-thickness rectal prolapse should be distinguished from mucosal prolapse in which there is protrusion of only the rectal or anal mucosa [].

Rectal prolapse refers specifically to the prolapse of some or all of the rectal mucosa through the external anal sphincter. In pediatric populations aged between infancy and age 4, rectal prolapse is usually a self-limiting condition, responding to conservative management. The highest incidence of rectal prolapse has been noted in the first year of life. However, children presenting after age 4 usually have a chronic condition predisposing them to have developed rectal prolapse. In some cases, the prolapse may persist indefinitely, requiring surgical intervention.

Types of Rectal Prolapse

  • External (complete) rectal prolapse – (rectal procidentia, full-thickness rectal prolapse, external rectal prolapse) is a full-thickness, circumferential, true intussusception of the rectal wall which protrudes from the anus and is visible externally.
  • Internal rectal intussusception – (occult rectal prolapse, internal procidentia) can be defined as a funnel-shaped infolding of the upper rectal (or lower sigmoid) wall that can occur during defecation.[rx] This infolding is perhaps best visualized as folding a sock inside out,[rx] creating “a tube within a tube”.[rx] Another definition is “where the rectum collapses but does not exit the anus”.[rx]
  • Rectal prolapse (procidentia)It is a full-thickness – circumferential intussusception of the entire rectal wall through the anal canal resulting in part of the rectum remaining intermittently or occasionally permanently distal to the anus. The latter condition is known as third-degree prolapse and the former state as a second degree.
  • Internal intussusception – It is an invagination of part or the entire rectum into itself without any external component, also known as 1° rectal prolapse.
  • Mucosal prolapse (partial rectal mucosal prolapse) refers to the prolapse of the loosening of the submucosal attachments to the muscular propria of the distal rectummucosal layer of the rectal wall. Most sources define mucosal prolapse as an external, segmental prolapse which is easily confused with prolapsed (3rd or 4th degree) hemorrhoids (piles). However, both internal mucosal prolapse (see below) and circumferential mucosal prolapse are described by some.[rx] Others do not consider mucosal prolapse a true form of rectal prolapse.[rx]
  • Internal mucosal prolapse (rectal internal mucosal prolapse, RIMP) – refers to the prolapse of the mucosal layer of the rectal wall which does not protrude externally. There is some controversy surrounding this condition as to its relationship with hemorrhoidal disease, or whether it is a separate entity.[rx] The term “mucosal hemorrhoidal prolapse” is also used.[rx]
  • Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS, solitary rectal ulcer, SRU) – occurs with internal rectal intussusception and is part of the spectrum of rectal prolapse conditions.[rx] It describes ulceration of the rectal lining caused by repeated frictional damage as the internal intussusception is forced into the anal canal during straining. SRUS can be considered a consequence of internal intussusception, which can be demonstrated in 94% of cases.
  • Mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS) – is recognized by some. It includes solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, rectal prolapse, proctitis cystica profunda, and inflammatory polyps. It is classified as a chronic benign inflammatory disorder.

There are three types of rectal prolapse

  • Full-thickness – The full thickness of the wall of the rectum sticks out through the anus. This is the most common type of rectal prolapse. There can be a partial or complete protrusion.
  • Mucosal – Only the lining of the anus (known as the mucosa) sticks out through the anus.
  • Internal – The rectum folds in on itself but does not stick out through the anus.

Patients were considered to be constipated if they had two or fewer bowel actions per week or strained for more than 25% of the time spent defecating. Incontinence of feces was graded according to Park’s classification [] into: –

  • Grade 4 = Incontinence for solid stool.
  • Grade 3 = Incontinence for liquid and flatus.
  • Grade 2 = Incontinence for flatus only.
  • Grade 1 = Normal.

or

Rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception have been classified according to the size of the prolapsed section of the rectum, a function of rectal mobility from the sacrum and infolding of the rectum. This classification also takes into account sphincter relaxation:

  • Grade I – nonrelaxation of the sphincter mechanism (anismus)
  • Grade II – mild intussusception
  • Grade III – moderate intussusception
  • Grade IV – severe intussusception
  • Grade V – rectal prolapse

Rectal internal mucosal prolapse has been graded according to the level of descent of the intussusceptum, which was predictive of symptom severity:[rx]

  • First-degree prolapse – is detectable below the anorectal ring on straining
  • Second degree – when it reached the dentate line
  • Third-degree – when it reached the anal verge

Pathogenesis of Rectal Prolapse

Etiologic factors: 1) congenital, 2) acquired.

  • At the beginning of the century Moschcowitz () described the anatomical basis for a rectal prolapse as a deficient pelvic floor through which the rectum herniates. This theory was that a redundant sigmoid colon lying within the deep pelvic sac, together with the resulting acute rectosigmoid junction, caused the patient to strain excessively to evacuate. Thus, the hypothesis continued, the eventual prolapse was the result of herniation through the weakened pelvic floor.
  • A latter concept suggested that rectal prolapse was actually a circumferential 2° or 3° intussusception (). Complete circumferential intussusception usually starts 6–8 cm from the anal verge but can continue through the anal canal ().

Predisposing and associated anatomical and functional factors:

  • Anatomical factors include female sex, redundant rectosigmoid, a deep pouch of Douglas, patulous anus (weak internal sphincter), diastasis of levator ani muscle (defects in the pelvic floor), lack of fixation of the rectum to the sacrum. Functional factors include poor bowel habits (chronic constipation), neurologic disease including congenital anomaly, cauda equina lesion, spinal cord injury, and senility.
  • The majority of patients are women () and peak occurrence is in the sixth decade of life. Rectal prolapse is relatively uncommon in men; moreover, they usually present when they are less than 50 years of age.

Causes of Rectal Prolapse

A variety of things can cause the condition, including:

  • The long-term history of diarrhea or constipation
  • The long-term history of having to strain when you poop
  • Old age, which weakens muscles and ligaments in the rectal area
  • Previous injury to the anal or hip area
  • Nerve damage that affects your muscles’ ability to tighten and loosen.
  • The long-term history of straining during bowel movements
  • Older age – Muscles and ligaments in the rectum and anus naturally weaken with age. Other nearby structures in the pelvis area also loosen with age, which adds to the general weakness in that area of the body.
  • Weakening of the anal sphincter – This is the specific muscle that controls the release of stool from the rectum.
  • Earlier injury to the anal or pelvic areas
  • Damage to nerves – If the nerves that control the ability of the rectum and anus muscles to contract (shrink) are damaged, rectal prolapse can result. Nerve damage can be caused by pregnancy, difficult vaginal childbirth, anal sphincter paralysis, spinal injury, back injury/back surgery and/or other surgeries of the pelvic area.
  • Other diseases, conditions and infections – Rectal prolapse can be a consequence of diabetes, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hysterectomy, and infections in the intestines caused by parasites – such as pinworms and whipworms – and diseases resulting from poor nutrition or from difficulty digesting foods.

Since rectal prolapse itself causes functional obstruction, more straining may result from a small prolapse, with increasing damage to the anatomy. This excessive straining may be due to predisposing pelvic floor dysfunction (e.g. obstructed defecation) and anatomical factors

  • Abnormally low descent of the peritoneum covering the anterior rectal wall
  • poor posterior rectal fixation, resulting in loss of posterior fixation of the rectum to the sacral curve[rx]
  • loss of the normal horizontal position of the rectum with lengthening (redundant rectosigmoid)[rx][rx] and downward displacement of the sigmoid and rectum
  • long rectal mesentery[rx]
  • a deep cul-de-sac
  • levator diastasis
  • a patulous, weak anal sphincter

Some authors question whether these abnormalities are the cause, or secondary to the prolapse. Other predisposing factors/associated conditions include:

  • pregnancy[rx] (although 35% of women who develop rectal prolapse are nulliparous)[rx] (have never given birth)
  • previous surgery[rx] (30-50% of females with the condition underwent previous gynecological surgery)[rx]
  • pelvic neuropathies and neurological disease[rx]
  • high gastrointestinal helminth loads (e.g. Whipworm)
  • COPD
  • cystic fibrosis

Symptoms of Rectal Prolapse

Additional symptoms of rectal prolapse can include

  • Feeling a bulge outside your anus
  • Seeing a red mass outside your anal opening
  • Pain in the anus or rectum
  • Bleeding from the rectum
  • Leaking blood, poop, or mucus from the anus
  • history of a protruding mass.[rx]
  • degrees of fecal incontinence, (50-80% of patients) which may simply present as a mucous discharge.[rx]
  • constipation (20-50% of patients) also described as tenesmus (a sensation of incomplete evacuation of stool) and obstructed defecation.[rx]
  • a feeling of bearing down.[rx]
  • rectal bleeding[rx]
  • diarrhea and erratic bowel habits.

Diagnosis of Rectal Prolapse

Anything that increases your chance of getting a disease is called a risk factor. Having a risk factor does not mean that you will get rectal prolapse; not having risk factors doesn’t mean that you will not get cancer. Talk to your doctor if you think you may be at risk for rectal prolapse

  • Having a family history of colon or rectal prolapse in a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or child).
  • Having a personal history of rectal prolapse of the colon, rectum, or ovary.
  • Having a personal history of high-risk adenomas (colorectal polyps that are 1 centimeter or larger in size or that have cells that look abnormal under a microscope).
  • Having inherited changes in certain genes that increase the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
  • Having a personal history of chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease for 8 years or more.
  • Having three or more alcoholic drinks per day.
  • Smoking cigarettes.
  • Being black.
  • Being obese.

Older age is the main risk factor for most rectal prolapse. The chance of getting rectal prolapse increases as you get older.

Tests that examine the rectum and colon are used to detect (find) and diagnose rectal cancer

Tests used to diagnose rectal prolapse include the following:

  • Physical exam and history – An exam of the body to check general signs of health, including checking for signs of disease, such as lumps or anything else that seems unusual. A history of the patient’s health habits and past illnesses and treatments will also be taken.
  • Digital rectal exam (DRE) – An exam of the rectum. The doctor or nurse inserts a lubricated, gloved finger into the lower part of the rectum to feel for lumps or anything else that seems unusual. In women, the vagina may also be examined.
  • Anal electromyography (EMG) – This test determines if nerve damage is the reason why the anal sphincters are not working properly. It also examines the coordination between the rectum and anal muscles.
  • Anal manometry – This test studies the strength of the anal sphincter muscles. A short, thin tube, inserted up into the anus and rectum, is used to measure the sphincter tightness.
  • Anal ultrasound – This test helps evaluate the shape and structure of the anal sphincter muscles and surrounding tissue. In this test, a small probe is inserted up into the anus and rectum to take images of the sphincters.
  • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency test – This test measures the function of the pudendal nerves, which are involved in bowel control.
  • Proctography (also called defecography) – This test is done in the radiology department. In this test, an X-ray video is taken that shows how well the rectum is functioning. The video shows how much stool the rectum can hold, how well the rectum holds the stool, and how well the rectum releases the stool.
  • Colonoscopy – A procedure to look inside the rectum and colon for polyps (small pieces of bulging tissue), abnormal areas, or cancer. A colonoscope is a thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing. It may also have a tool to remove polyps or tissue samples, which are checked under a microscope for signs of cancer.
  • Biopsy – The removal of cells or tissues so they can be viewed under a microscope to check for signs of rectal prolapse. Tumor tissue that is removed during the biopsy may be checked to see if the patient is likely to have the gene mutation that causes HNPCC. This may help to plan treatment. The following tests may be used:
  • Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) test – A laboratory test in which the amount of a genetic substance called mRNA made by a specific gene is measured. An enzyme called reverse transcriptase is used to convert a specific piece of RNA into a matching piece of DNA, which can be amplified (made in large numbers) by another enzyme called DNA polymerase. The amplified DNA copies help tell whether a specific mRNA is being made by a gene. RT–PCR can be used to check the activation of certain genes that may indicate the presence of rectal prolapse cells. This test may be used to look for certain changes in a gene or chromosome, which may help diagnose rectal prolapse.
  • Immunohistochemistry – A laboratory test that uses antibodies to check for certain antigens (markers) in a sample of a patient’s tissue. The antibodies are usually linked to an enzyme or a fluorescent dye. After the antibodies bind to a specific antigen in the tissue sample, the enzyme or dye is activated, and the antigen can then be seen under a microscope. This type of test is used to help diagnose cancer and to help tell one type of cancer from another type of cancer.
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay – A test that measures the level of CEA in the blood. CEA is released into the bloodstream from both rectal prolapse and normal cells. When found in higher than normal amounts, it can be a sign of rectal prolapse or other conditions.
  • Anorectal manometry – measures and assesses the anal sphincter (internal and external) and rectal pressure and its function. This method is used to evaluate patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. It can directly measure the luminal pressure, including the high-pressure zone, resting pressure, squeezing pressure, rectal sensation/compliance, and the anorectal inhibitory reflex.
  • Defecating proctography/Defecography – A study using X-ray imaging to evaluate anatomic defects of the anorectal region and function of the puborectalis muscle. A contrast filled paste gets initially introduced to the rectum, and the patient is instructed to defecate in a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, tensing of the abdomen, and evacuation).
  • Balloon capacity and compliance test – Evaluates the function of the rectum using a device (plastic catheter with a latex balloon attached), which is inserted into the rectum and gradually filled with warm water. During this process, the volume and pressure are measured.
  • Balloon evacuation study – This test is similar to the balloon capacity and compliance test in which a catheter with a small balloon gets inserted into the rectum and filled with water. Different volumes of water get loaded inside the balloon, and the patient is instructed to evacuate the balloon. This procedure is done to evaluate the opening of the anal canal and to assess the relaxation of the pelvic floor.
  • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency – A probe designed to stimulate and record nerve activity is placed on the physician’s gloved finger, which is then inserted into the rectum to measure pudendal nerve activity (latency to contraction of the anal sphincter muscle). The pudendal nerve innervates the anal sphincter muscles; therefore, this test can be used to assess any injury to that nerve.
  • Electromyography – A test to measure the ability of the puborectalis muscle and sphincter muscles to relax properly. An electrode is placed inside the rectum, and the activity of these muscles gets evaluated throughout a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, and evacuation).
  • Endoanal Ultrasonography – The use of ultrasound imaging to examine rectal lesions, defects, or injuries to the surrounding tissues.
  • Suction rectal biopsy – Gold standard for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. A biopsy is taken two cm above the dentate line, and the absence of ganglion cells on histology confirms the diagnosis. Hypertrophic nerve fibers may be present in addition to this finding.
  • Contrast enema – Used as one of the diagnostic methods for Hirschsprung disease. Useful for localization of the aganglionic segment by looking for a narrowed rectum. Diagnostic confirmation is via a rectal biopsy.

Treatment of Rectal Prolapse

  • Activity – Typically, the child is encouraged to walk around as soon as possible.
  • Diet –  Patients are started on liquids after their surgery then advanced to a general diet.
  • Antibiotics –  To help prevent or treat an infection caused by bacteria.
  • Anti-nausea medicine –  To control vomiting (throwing up).
  • Pain medicine –  Pain medicine can include acetaminophen (Tylenol®), ibuprofen (Motrin®), or narcotics. These medicines can be given by vein or by mouth.
  • Stool softeners –  Polyethylene glycol (Miralax), Docusate (Colace) or senna are among the medications used to avoid straining after surgery.

Therapy

  • Management of rectal prolapse is surgical; over 100 different procedures have been described. The existence of so many surgical options is an attestation to the lack of uniform success associated with any one single procedure. Since no procedure is a panacea, the operation selected should be matched to the physiologic condition of the patient.

Transabdominal

  • Transabdominal repairs involve rectal fixation, rectal resection or a combination of resection and fixation. Attachment of the rectum to the sacrum can be performed using foreign material or sutures although the lateral rectal attachments can be achieved to the sacral periosteum without foreign material.
  • The primary advantages of a transabdominal procedure are the lower recurrence rates and the associated improvements in incontinence as well as the preservation of a rectal reservoir. Disadvantages are that they are a more invasive procedures and do have an associated risk of postoperative sexual dysfunction in males.

Anterior rectopexy (Ripstein procedure)

  • The rectum is completely mobilized posteriorly. A loose sung of mesh is wrapped around the anterior wall of the rectum and sutured to the sacrum.
  • Results: Recurrence varies form 0 to 10% (, ). Sling complications are noted in as many as 16.5% of patients with a 4% reoperation rate.

Posterior sling rectopexy (Wells procedure)

  • After posterior rectal mobilization and fixation of a mesh to the sacral hollow, the mesh is wrapped around the lateral aspects while the anterior rectal wall is left free to prevent stricture.
  • Results: Recurrence rates for anterior and posterior rectopexy are similar. However, the rate of stricture and therefore postoperative constipation may be lower after posterior than after anterior rectopexy.

Anterior resection without fixation

  • After anterior resection – the rectum becomes secondarily scarred and therefore adherent to the sacrum.
  • Advantages – removal of the redundant colon may prevent volvulus and torsion and may ameliorate some bowel complaints, especially constipation.
  • Disadvantages – Risk for anastomotic leak.
  • Results – Recurrence rate 9% (). Deterioration of continence has been reported in 10–20% () of patients.

Resection with sacral fixation

  • Fixation of the distal rectal segment to the sacrum with redundant sigmoid extirpation.
  • Results: Initial reports stated recurrence rates of 2–9% (). Bowel control is more likely to be improved when compared to other methods. The procedure is comparable to rectopexy with respect to operative morbidity but postoperative constipation is less likely (). Division of the lateral ligaments decreases recurrence rates but increases the incidence of postoperative constipation.

Suture Rectopexy

  • Perhaps the simplest abdominal approach is rectopexy. The rectum is mobilized distally down to the levator ani muscles. The mesentery of the rectum and the muscular are secured to the sacral fascia or bone.
  • Results: Recurrence rates are reported in 2–5% (, ). However, a redundant sigmoid colon may at least theoretically cause the onset of or exacerbate preexisting constipation.

Laparoscopy

  • Sutured rectopexy, mesh rectopexy, and anterior resection or resection rectopexy are all technically feasible laparoscopic approaches. So far controlled trials have not been performed and long-term recurrence data are not yet available. Small series suggest that morbidity and short term recurrence rates are similar to these reported by laparotomy.

Perineal procedures

  • Perineal procedures are associated with a higher recurrence rate than abdominal procedures. In addition, postoperative incontinence may be exacerbated (). However, the benefits are related to avoiding a laparotomy and include very low morbidity and negligible disability. These operations can be done under general, regional or occasionally local anesthesia.

Altemeier operation (perineal proctosigmoidectomy)

Perineal resection of the full thickness of the prolapsed segment with coloanal anastomosis.

  • Results: Recurrence rates can reach up to 50%. Additional plication of the levator ani muscles seems to be associated with a lower incidence of recurrence and better functional outcome (). The addition of a colonic J pouch has been attempted but no results have been reported to date.

Delorme Procedure

Unlike the perineal rectosigmoidectomy the dissection is within the submucosal layer. The mucosa and the submucosa are excised and the denuded muscularis is longitudinally pleated prior to effecting the anastomosis.

  • Results: Recurrence varies from 7 to 22% ().

Encirclement procedures

  • These operations are no longer used as they fail to eliminate the prolapse or to improve incontinence. Moreover high rates of infection, implant extrusion and stenosis with associated prolapse incarceration have been noted.

The most common types of surgery

  • Through the abdomen – This type of surgery can be done either with a large incision or using laparoscopy — this process uses small cuts and a camera attached to an instrument so the surgeon can see what needs to be done and if there are any additional issues that need to be fixed.
  • Rectal repair – This approach may be used if you are older or have other medical problems. This type of surgery can involve the inner lining of the rectum or the portion of the rectum extending out of the anus.
  • Altemeier procedure – In this procedure — also called a perineal proctosigmoidectomy — the portion of the rectum extending out of the anus is cut off (amputated) and the two ends are sewn back together. The remaining structures that help support the rectum are stitched back together in an attempt to provide better support.
  • Delorme procedure – In this procedure, only the inner lining of the fallen rectum is removed. The outer layer is then folded and stitched and the cut edges of the inner lining are stitched together so that rectum is now inside the anal canal.
  • Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery – Also done through the abdomen, this procedure uses several smaller incisions. The surgeon inserts special surgical tools and a tiny camera through the abdominal incisions to repair the rectal prolapse. An emerging robotic approach uses a robot to perform the operation.
  • Rectal prolapse repair through the area around the anus (perineal rectosigmoidectomy) – During the more commonly performed form of this procedure (Altemeier procedure), the surgeon pulls the rectum through the anus, removes a portion of the rectum and sigmoid and attaches the remaining rectum to the large intestine (colon). This repair is typically reserved for those who are not candidates for open or laparoscopic repair

Home Care (“What do I need to do once my child goes home?”)

  • Diet –  Your child may eat a normal diet after surgery. Avoid constipating foods such as dairy products, rice and bananas.
  • Activity –  Your child should avoid strenuous activity and heavy lifting for the first 1-2 weeks after laparoscopic surgery, 4-6 weeks after open surgery.
  • Wound care –  Surgical incisions should be kept clean and dry for a few days after surgery. Most of the time, the stitches used in children are absorbable and do not require removal. Your surgeon will give you specific guidance regarding wound care, including when your child can shower or bathe.
  • Medicines – Medicines for pain such as acetaminophen (Tylenol®l) or ibuprofen (Motrin® or Advil®) or something stronger like a narcotic may be needed to help with pain for a few days after surgery. Stool softeners and laxatives are needed to help regular stooling after surgery, especially if narcotics are still needed for pain.
  • What to call the doctor for – Call your doctor for worsening belly pain, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, problems with urination, or if the wounds are red or draining fluid.
  • Follow-up care – Your child should follow up with his or her surgeon 2-3 weeks after surgery to ensure proper post-operative healing.

Long-Term Outcomes (“Are there future conditions to worry about?”)

  • The long-term prognosis for children with rectal prolapse is good. More than 90 percent of children who experience rectal prolapse between nine months and three years of age will respond to medical treatment and will not require surgery.
  • Children who develop rectal prolapse after the age of four are more likely to have underlying neurologic or muscular defects of the pelvis. These children are less likely to respond to medical treatments and should be seen early for surgical intervention.

References

ByRx Harun

Rectal Prolapse – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment

Rectal Prolapse or procidentia is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. Complete or full-thickness rectal prolapse is the protrusion of all of the rectal wall through the anal canal if the rectal wall has prolapsed but does not protrude through the anus, it is called an occult (internal) rectal prolapse or a rectal intussusception []. Full-thickness rectal prolapse should be distinguished from mucosal prolapse in which there is protrusion of only the rectal or anal mucosa [].

Rectal prolapse refers specifically to the prolapse of some or all of the rectal mucosa through the external anal sphincter. In pediatric populations aged between infancy and age 4, rectal prolapse is usually a self-limiting condition, responding to conservative management. The highest incidence of rectal prolapse has been noted in the first year of life. However, children presenting after age 4 usually have a chronic condition predisposing them to have developed rectal prolapse. In some cases, the prolapse may persist indefinitely, requiring surgical intervention.

Types of Rectal Prolapse

  • External (complete) rectal prolapse – (rectal procidentia, full-thickness rectal prolapse, external rectal prolapse) is a full-thickness, circumferential, true intussusception of the rectal wall which protrudes from the anus and is visible externally.
  • Internal rectal intussusception – (occult rectal prolapse, internal procidentia) can be defined as a funnel-shaped infolding of the upper rectal (or lower sigmoid) wall that can occur during defecation.[rx] This infolding is perhaps best visualized as folding a sock inside out,[rx] creating “a tube within a tube”.[rx] Another definition is “where the rectum collapses but does not exit the anus”.[rx]
  • Rectal prolapse (procidentia)It is a full-thickness – circumferential intussusception of the entire rectal wall through the anal canal resulting in part of the rectum remaining intermittently or occasionally permanently distal to the anus. The latter condition is known as third-degree prolapse and the former state as a second degree.
  • Internal intussusception – It is an invagination of part or the entire rectum into itself without any external component, also known as 1° rectal prolapse.
  • Mucosal prolapse (partial rectal mucosal prolapse) refers to the prolapse of the loosening of the submucosal attachments to the muscular propria of the distal rectummucosal layer of the rectal wall. Most sources define mucosal prolapse as an external, segmental prolapse which is easily confused with prolapsed (3rd or 4th degree) hemorrhoids (piles). However, both internal mucosal prolapse (see below) and circumferential mucosal prolapse are described by some.[rx] Others do not consider mucosal prolapse a true form of rectal prolapse.[rx]
  • Internal mucosal prolapse (rectal internal mucosal prolapse, RIMP) – refers to the prolapse of the mucosal layer of the rectal wall which does not protrude externally. There is some controversy surrounding this condition as to its relationship with hemorrhoidal disease, or whether it is a separate entity.[rx] The term “mucosal hemorrhoidal prolapse” is also used.[rx]
  • Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS, solitary rectal ulcer, SRU) – occurs with internal rectal intussusception and is part of the spectrum of rectal prolapse conditions.[rx] It describes ulceration of the rectal lining caused by repeated frictional damage as the internal intussusception is forced into the anal canal during straining. SRUS can be considered a consequence of internal intussusception, which can be demonstrated in 94% of cases.
  • Mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS) – is recognized by some. It includes solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, rectal prolapse, proctitis cystica profunda, and inflammatory polyps. It is classified as a chronic benign inflammatory disorder.

There are three types of rectal prolapse:

  • Full-thickness – The full thickness of the wall of the rectum sticks out through the anus. This is the most common type of rectal prolapse. There can be a partial or complete protrusion.
  • Mucosal – Only the lining of the anus (known as the mucosa) sticks out through the anus.
  • Internal – The rectum folds in on itself but does not stick out through the anus.

Patients were considered to be constipated if they had two or fewer bowel actions per week or strained for more than 25% of the time spent defecating. Incontinence of feces was graded according to Park’s classification [] into: –

  • Grade 4 = Incontinence for solid stool.
  • Grade 3 = Incontinence for liquid and flatus.
  • Grade 2 = Incontinence for flatus only.
  • Grade 1 = Normal.

or

Rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception have been classified according to the size of the prolapsed section of the rectum, a function of rectal mobility from the sacrum and infolding of the rectum. This classification also takes into account sphincter relaxation:

  • Grade I – nonrelaxation of the sphincter mechanism (anismus)
  • Grade II – mild intussusception
  • Grade III – moderate intussusception
  • Grade IV – severe intussusception
  • Grade V – rectal prolapse

Rectal internal mucosal prolapse has been graded according to the level of descent of the intussusceptum, which was predictive of symptom severity:[rx]

  • First-degree prolapse – is detectable below the anorectal ring on straining
  • Second degree – when it reached the dentate line
  • Third-degree – when it reached the anal verge

Pathogenesis of Rectal Prolapse

Etiologic factors: 1) congenital, 2) acquired.

  • At the beginning of the century Moschcowitz () described the anatomical basis for a rectal prolapse as a deficient pelvic floor through which the rectum herniates. This theory was that a redundant sigmoid colon lying within the deep pelvic sac, together with the resulting acute rectosigmoid junction, caused the patient to strain excessively to evacuate. Thus, the hypothesis continued, the eventual prolapse was the result of herniation through the weakened pelvic floor.
  • A latter concept suggested that rectal prolapse was actually a circumferential 2° or 3° intussusception (). Complete circumferential intussusception usually starts 6–8 cm from the anal verge but can continue through the anal canal ().

Predisposing and associated anatomical and functional factors:

  • Anatomical factors include female sex, redundant rectosigmoid, a deep pouch of Douglas, patulous anus (weak internal sphincter), diastasis of levator ani muscle (defects in the pelvic floor), lack of fixation of the rectum to the sacrum. Functional factors include poor bowel habits (chronic constipation), neurologic disease including congenital anomaly, cauda equina lesion, spinal cord injury, and senility.
  • The majority of patients are women () and peak occurrence is in the sixth decade of life. Rectal prolapse is relatively uncommon in men; moreover, they usually present when they are less than 50 years of age.

Causes of Rectal Prolapse

A variety of things can cause the condition, including:

  • The long-term history of diarrhea or constipation
  • The long-term history of having to strain when you poop
  • Old age, which weakens muscles and ligaments in the rectal area
  • Previous injury to the anal or hip area
  • Nerve damage that affects your muscles’ ability to tighten and loosen.
  • The long-term history of straining during bowel movements
  • Older age – Muscles and ligaments in the rectum and anus naturally weaken with age. Other nearby structures in the pelvis area also loosen with age, which adds to the general weakness in that area of the body.
  • Weakening of the anal sphincter – This is the specific muscle that controls the release of stool from the rectum.
  • Earlier injury to the anal or pelvic areas
  • Damage to nerves – If the nerves that control the ability of the rectum and anus muscles to contract (shrink) are damaged, rectal prolapse can result. Nerve damage can be caused by pregnancy, difficult vaginal childbirth, anal sphincter paralysis, spinal injury, back injury/back surgery and/or other surgeries of the pelvic area.
  • Other diseases, conditions and infections – Rectal prolapse can be a consequence of diabetes, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hysterectomy, and infections in the intestines caused by parasites – such as pinworms and whipworms – and diseases resulting from poor nutrition or from difficulty digesting foods.

Since rectal prolapse itself causes functional obstruction, more straining may result from a small prolapse, with increasing damage to the anatomy. This excessive straining may be due to predisposing pelvic floor dysfunction (e.g. obstructed defecation) and anatomical factors

  • Abnormally low descent of the peritoneum covering the anterior rectal wall
  • poor posterior rectal fixation, resulting in loss of posterior fixation of the rectum to the sacral curve[rx]
  • loss of the normal horizontal position of the rectum with lengthening (redundant rectosigmoid)[rx][rx] and downward displacement of the sigmoid and rectum
  • long rectal mesentery[rx]
  • a deep cul-de-sac
  • levator diastasis
  • a patulous, weak anal sphincter

Some authors question whether these abnormalities are the cause, or secondary to the prolapse. Other predisposing factors/associated conditions include:

  • pregnancy[rx] (although 35% of women who develop rectal prolapse are nulliparous)[rx] (have never given birth)
  • previous surgery[rx] (30-50% of females with the condition underwent previous gynecological surgery)[rx]
  • pelvic neuropathies and neurological disease[rx]
  • high gastrointestinal helminth loads (e.g. Whipworm)
  • COPD
  • cystic fibrosis

Symptoms of Rectal Prolapse

Additional symptoms of rectal prolapse can include

  • Feeling a bulge outside your anus
  • Seeing a red mass outside your anal opening
  • Pain in the anus or rectum
  • Bleeding from the rectum
  • Leaking blood, poop, or mucus from the anus
  • history of a protruding mass.[rx]
  • degrees of fecal incontinence, (50-80% of patients) which may simply present as a mucous discharge.[rx]
  • constipation (20-50% of patients) also described as tenesmus (a sensation of incomplete evacuation of stool) and obstructed defecation.[rx]
  • a feeling of bearing down.[rx]
  • rectal bleeding[rx]
  • diarrhea and erratic bowel habits.

Diagnosis of Rectal Prolapse

Anything that increases your chance of getting a disease is called a risk factor. Having a risk factor does not mean that you will get rectal prolapse; not having risk factors doesn’t mean that you will not get cancer. Talk to your doctor if you think you may be at risk for rectal prolapse

  • Having a family history of colon or rectal prolapse in a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or child).
  • Having a personal history of rectal prolapse of the colon, rectum, or ovary.
  • Having a personal history of high-risk adenomas (colorectal polyps that are 1 centimeter or larger in size or that have cells that look abnormal under a microscope).
  • Having inherited changes in certain genes that increase the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
  • Having a personal history of chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease for 8 years or more.
  • Having three or more alcoholic drinks per day.
  • Smoking cigarettes.
  • Being black.
  • Being obese.

Older age is the main risk factor for most rectal prolapse. The chance of getting rectal prolapse increases as you get older.

Tests that examine the rectum and colon are used to detect (find) and diagnose rectal cancer

Tests used to diagnose rectal prolapse include the following:

  • Physical exam and history – An exam of the body to check general signs of health, including checking for signs of disease, such as lumps or anything else that seems unusual. A history of the patient’s health habits and past illnesses and treatments will also be taken.
  • Digital rectal exam (DRE) – An exam of the rectum. The doctor or nurse inserts a lubricated, gloved finger into the lower part of the rectum to feel for lumps or anything else that seems unusual. In women, the vagina may also be examined.
  • Anal electromyography (EMG) – This test determines if nerve damage is the reason why the anal sphincters are not working properly. It also examines the coordination between the rectum and anal muscles.
  • Anal manometry – This test studies the strength of the anal sphincter muscles. A short, thin tube, inserted up into the anus and rectum, is used to measure the sphincter tightness.
  • Anal ultrasound – This test helps evaluate the shape and structure of the anal sphincter muscles and surrounding tissue. In this test, a small probe is inserted up into the anus and rectum to take images of the sphincters.
  • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency test – This test measures the function of the pudendal nerves, which are involved in bowel control.
  • Proctography (also called defecography) – This test is done in the radiology department. In this test, an X-ray video is taken that shows how well the rectum is functioning. The video shows how much stool the rectum can hold, how well the rectum holds the stool, and how well the rectum releases the stool.
  • Colonoscopy – A procedure to look inside the rectum and colon for polyps (small pieces of bulging tissue), abnormal areas, or cancer. A colonoscope is a thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing. It may also have a tool to remove polyps or tissue samples, which are checked under a microscope for signs of cancer.
  • Biopsy – The removal of cells or tissues so they can be viewed under a microscope to check for signs of rectal prolapse. Tumor tissue that is removed during the biopsy may be checked to see if the patient is likely to have the gene mutation that causes HNPCC. This may help to plan treatment. The following tests may be used:
  • Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) test – A laboratory test in which the amount of a genetic substance called mRNA made by a specific gene is measured. An enzyme called reverse transcriptase is used to convert a specific piece of RNA into a matching piece of DNA, which can be amplified (made in large numbers) by another enzyme called DNA polymerase. The amplified DNA copies help tell whether a specific mRNA is being made by a gene. RT–PCR can be used to check the activation of certain genes that may indicate the presence of rectal prolapse cells. This test may be used to look for certain changes in a gene or chromosome, which may help diagnose rectal prolapse.
  • Immunohistochemistry – A laboratory test that uses antibodies to check for certain antigens (markers) in a sample of a patient’s tissue. The antibodies are usually linked to an enzyme or a fluorescent dye. After the antibodies bind to a specific antigen in the tissue sample, the enzyme or dye is activated, and the antigen can then be seen under a microscope. This type of test is used to help diagnose cancer and to help tell one type of cancer from another type of cancer.
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay – A test that measures the level of CEA in the blood. CEA is released into the bloodstream from both rectal prolapse and normal cells. When found in higher than normal amounts, it can be a sign of rectal prolapse or other conditions.
  • Anorectal manometry – measures and assesses the anal sphincter (internal and external) and rectal pressure and its function. This method is used to evaluate patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. It can directly measure the luminal pressure, including the high-pressure zone, resting pressure, squeezing pressure, rectal sensation/compliance, and the anorectal inhibitory reflex.
  • Defecating proctography/Defecography – A study using X-ray imaging to evaluate anatomic defects of the anorectal region and function of the puborectalis muscle. A contrast filled paste gets initially introduced to the rectum, and the patient is instructed to defecate in a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, tensing of the abdomen, and evacuation).
  • Balloon capacity and compliance test – Evaluates the function of the rectum using a device (plastic catheter with a latex balloon attached), which is inserted into the rectum and gradually filled with warm water. During this process, the volume and pressure are measured.
  • Balloon evacuation study – This test is similar to the balloon capacity and compliance test in which a catheter with a small balloon gets inserted into the rectum and filled with water. Different volumes of water get loaded inside the balloon, and the patient is instructed to evacuate the balloon. This procedure is done to evaluate the opening of the anal canal and to assess the relaxation of the pelvic floor.
  • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency – A probe designed to stimulate and record nerve activity is placed on the physician’s gloved finger, which is then inserted into the rectum to measure pudendal nerve activity (latency to contraction of the anal sphincter muscle). The pudendal nerve innervates the anal sphincter muscles; therefore, this test can be used to assess any injury to that nerve.
  • Electromyography – A test to measure the ability of the puborectalis muscle and sphincter muscles to relax properly. An electrode is placed inside the rectum, and the activity of these muscles gets evaluated throughout a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, and evacuation).
  • Endoanal Ultrasonography – The use of ultrasound imaging to examine rectal lesions, defects, or injuries to the surrounding tissues.
  • Suction rectal biopsy – Gold standard for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. A biopsy is taken two cm above the dentate line, and the absence of ganglion cells on histology confirms the diagnosis. Hypertrophic nerve fibers may be present in addition to this finding.
  • Contrast enema – Used as one of the diagnostic methods for Hirschsprung disease. Useful for localization of the aganglionic segment by looking for a narrowed rectum. Diagnostic confirmation is via a rectal biopsy.

Treatment of Rectal Prolapse

  • Activity – Typically, the child is encouraged to walk around as soon as possible.
  • Diet –  Patients are started on liquids after their surgery then advanced to a general diet.
  • Antibiotics –  To help prevent or treat an infection caused by bacteria.
  • Anti-nausea medicine –  To control vomiting (throwing up).
  • Pain medicine –  Pain medicine can include acetaminophen (Tylenol®), ibuprofen (Motrin®), or narcotics. These medicines can be given by vein or by mouth.
  • Stool softeners –  Polyethylene glycol (Miralax), Docusate (Colace) or senna are among the medications used to avoid straining after surgery.

Therapy

  • Management of rectal prolapse is surgical; over 100 different procedures have been described. The existence of so many surgical options is an attestation to the lack of uniform success associated with any one single procedure. Since no procedure is a panacea, the operation selected should be matched to the physiologic condition of the patient.

Transabdominal

  • Transabdominal repairs involve rectal fixation, rectal resection or a combination of resection and fixation. Attachment of the rectum to the sacrum can be performed using foreign material or sutures although the lateral rectal attachments can be achieved to the sacral periosteum without foreign material.
  • The primary advantages of a transabdominal procedure are the lower recurrence rates and the associated improvements in incontinence as well as the preservation of a rectal reservoir. Disadvantages are that they are a more invasive procedures and do have an associated risk of postoperative sexual dysfunction in males.

Anterior rectopexy (Ripstein procedure)

  • The rectum is completely mobilized posteriorly. A loose sung of mesh is wrapped around the anterior wall of the rectum and sutured to the sacrum.
  • Results: Recurrence varies form 0 to 10% (, ). Sling complications are noted in as many as 16.5% of patients with a 4% reoperation rate.

Posterior sling rectopexy (Wells procedure)

  • After posterior rectal mobilization and fixation of a mesh to the sacral hollow, the mesh is wrapped around the lateral aspects while the anterior rectal wall is left free to prevent stricture.
  • Results: Recurrence rates for anterior and posterior rectopexy are similar. However, the rate of stricture and therefore postoperative constipation may be lower after posterior than after anterior rectopexy.

Anterior resection without fixation

  • After anterior resection – the rectum becomes secondarily scarred and therefore adherent to the sacrum.
  • Advantages – removal of the redundant colon may prevent volvulus and torsion and may ameliorate some bowel complaints, especially constipation.
  • Disadvantages – Risk for anastomotic leak.
  • Results – Recurrence rate 9% (). Deterioration of continence has been reported in 10–20% () of patients.

Resection with sacral fixation

  • Fixation of the distal rectal segment to the sacrum with redundant sigmoid extirpation.
  • Results: Initial reports stated recurrence rates of 2–9% (). Bowel control is more likely to be improved when compared to other methods. The procedure is comparable to rectopexy with respect to operative morbidity but postoperative constipation is less likely (). Division of the lateral ligaments decreases recurrence rates but increases the incidence of postoperative constipation.

Suture Rectopexy

  • Perhaps the simplest abdominal approach is rectopexy. The rectum is mobilized distally down to the levator ani muscles. The mesentery of the rectum and the muscular are secured to the sacral fascia or bone.
  • Results: Recurrence rates are reported in 2–5% (, ). However, a redundant sigmoid colon may at least theoretically cause the onset of or exacerbate preexisting constipation.

Laparoscopy

  • Sutured rectopexy, mesh rectopexy, and anterior resection or resection rectopexy are all technically feasible laparoscopic approaches. So far controlled trials have not been performed and long-term recurrence data are not yet available. Small series suggest that morbidity and short term recurrence rates are similar to these reported by laparotomy.

Perineal procedures

  • Perineal procedures are associated with a higher recurrence rate than abdominal procedures. In addition, postoperative incontinence may be exacerbated (). However, the benefits are related to avoiding a laparotomy and include very low morbidity and negligible disability. These operations can be done under general, regional or occasionally local anesthesia.

Altemeier operation (perineal proctosigmoidectomy)

Perineal resection of the full thickness of the prolapsed segment with coloanal anastomosis.

  • Results: Recurrence rates can reach up to 50%. Additional plication of the levator ani muscles seems to be associated with a lower incidence of recurrence and better functional outcome (). The addition of a colonic J pouch has been attempted but no results have been reported to date.

Delorme Procedure

Unlike the perineal rectosigmoidectomy the dissection is within the submucosal layer. The mucosa and the submucosa are excised and the denuded muscularis is longitudinally pleated prior to effecting the anastomosis.

  • Results: Recurrence varies from 7 to 22% ().

Encirclement procedures

  • These operations are no longer used as they fail to eliminate the prolapse or to improve incontinence. Moreover high rates of infection, implant extrusion and stenosis with associated prolapse incarceration have been noted.

The most common types of surgery

  • Through the abdomen – This type of surgery can be done either with a large incision or using laparoscopy — this process uses small cuts and a camera attached to an instrument so the surgeon can see what needs to be done and if there are any additional issues that need to be fixed.
  • Rectal repair – This approach may be used if you are older or have other medical problems. This type of surgery can involve the inner lining of the rectum or the portion of the rectum extending out of the anus.
  • Altemeier procedure – In this procedure — also called a perineal proctosigmoidectomy — the portion of the rectum extending out of the anus is cut off (amputated) and the two ends are sewn back together. The remaining structures that help support the rectum are stitched back together in an attempt to provide better support.
  • Delorme procedure – In this procedure, only the inner lining of the fallen rectum is removed. The outer layer is then folded and stitched and the cut edges of the inner lining are stitched together so that rectum is now inside the anal canal.
  • Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery – Also done through the abdomen, this procedure uses several smaller incisions. The surgeon inserts special surgical tools and a tiny camera through the abdominal incisions to repair the rectal prolapse. An emerging robotic approach uses a robot to perform the operation.
  • Rectal prolapse repair through the area around the anus (perineal rectosigmoidectomy) – During the more commonly performed form of this procedure (Altemeier procedure), the surgeon pulls the rectum through the anus, removes a portion of the rectum and sigmoid and attaches the remaining rectum to the large intestine (colon). This repair is typically reserved for those who are not candidates for open or laparoscopic repair

Home Care (“What do I need to do once my child goes home?”)

  • Diet –  Your child may eat a normal diet after surgery. Avoid constipating foods such as dairy products, rice and bananas.
  • Activity –  Your child should avoid strenuous activity and heavy lifting for the first 1-2 weeks after laparoscopic surgery, 4-6 weeks after open surgery.
  • Wound care –  Surgical incisions should be kept clean and dry for a few days after surgery. Most of the time, the stitches used in children are absorbable and do not require removal. Your surgeon will give you specific guidance regarding wound care, including when your child can shower or bathe.
  • Medicines – Medicines for pain such as acetaminophen (Tylenol®l) or ibuprofen (Motrin® or Advil®) or something stronger like a narcotic may be needed to help with pain for a few days after surgery. Stool softeners and laxatives are needed to help regular stooling after surgery, especially if narcotics are still needed for pain.
  • What to call the doctor for – Call your doctor for worsening belly pain, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, problems with urination, or if the wounds are red or draining fluid.
  • Follow-up care – Your child should follow up with his or her surgeon 2-3 weeks after surgery to ensure proper post-operative healing.

Long-Term Outcomes (“Are there future conditions to worry about?”)

  • The long-term prognosis for children with rectal prolapse is good. More than 90 percent of children who experience rectal prolapse between nine months and three years of age will respond to medical treatment and will not require surgery.
  • Children who develop rectal prolapse after the age of four are more likely to have underlying neurologic or muscular defects of the pelvis. These children are less likely to respond to medical treatments and should be seen early for surgical intervention.

References

ByRx Harun

Colorectal Carcinoma – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

Colorectal Carcinoma is a cancer of the colon and/or rectum. Your doctor may perform a colonoscopy, CT colonography (also known as virtual colonoscopy) or an air-contrast barium enema to help diagnose your condition. Your doctor also may order an abdominal and pelvic CT, PET/CT, pelvic MRI or an endorectal ultrasound to help assess the cancer and look for any signs of spread.

General Information About Colorectal Carcinoma

Incidence and Mortality

It is difficult to separate epidemiological considerations of rectal cancer from those of colon cancer because epidemiological studies often consider colon and rectal cancer (i.e., colorectal cancer) together.

Worldwide, colorectal cancer is the third most common form of cancer. In 2012, there were an estimated 1.36 million new cases of colorectal cancer and 694,000 deaths.[]

Estimated new cases and deaths from rectal and colon cancer in the United States in 2020:[]

  • New cases of rectal cancer: 43,340.
  • New cases of colon cancer: 104,610.
  • Deaths: 53,200 (rectal and colon cancers combined).

Colorectal cancer affects men and women almost equally. Among all racial groups in the United States, African Americans have the highest sporadic colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates.[,]

Anatomy

Gastrointestinal (digestive) system anatomy; shows esophagus, liver, stomach, colon, small intestine, rectum, and anus.

Anatomy of the lower gastrointestinal system.

The rectum is located within the pelvis, extending from the transitional mucosa of the anal dentate line to the sigmoid colon at the peritoneal reflection; by rigid sigmoidoscopy, the rectum measures between 10 cm and 15 cm from the anal verge.[] The location of a rectal tumor is usually indicated by the distance between the anal verge, dentate line, or anorectal ring and the lower edge of the tumor, with measurements differing depending on the use of a rigid or flexible endoscope or digital examination.[]

The distance of the tumor from the anal sphincter musculature has implications for the ability to perform sphincter-sparing surgery. The bony constraints of the pelvis limit surgical access to the rectum, which results in a lesser likelihood of attaining widely negative margins and a higher risk of local recurrence.[]

Risk Factors

Increasing age is the most important risk factor for most cancers. Other risk factors for colorectal cancer include the following:

  • Family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative.[]
  • Personal history of colorectal adenomas, colorectal cancer, or ovarian cancer.[]
  • Hereditary conditions, including familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer [HNPCC]).[]
  • Personal history of long-standing chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn colitis.[]
  • Excessive alcohol use.[]
  • Cigarette smoking.[]
  • Race/ethnicity: African American.[,]
  • Obesity.[]

Screening

Evidence supports screening for rectal cancer as a part of routine care for all adults aged 50 years and older, especially for those with first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer, for the following reasons:

  • Incidence of the disease in those 50 years and older.
  • Ability to identify high-risk groups.
  • Slow growth of primary lesions.
  • Better survival of patients with early-stage lesions.
  • Relative simplicity and accuracy of screening tests.

(Refer to the PDQ summary on Colorectal Cancer Screening for more information.)

Clinical Features

Similar to colon cancer, symptoms of rectal cancer may include the following:[]

  • Rectal bleeding.
  • Change in bowel habits.
  • Abdominal pain.
  • Intestinal obstruction.
  • Change in appetite.
  • Weight loss.
  • Weakness.

With the exception of obstructive symptoms, these symptoms do not necessarily correlate with the stage of disease or signify a particular diagnosis.[]

Diagnostic Evaluation

The initial clinical evaluation may include the following:

  • Physical exam and history.
  • Digital rectal exam.
  • Colonoscopy.
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay.
  • Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test.
  • Immunohistochemistry.

Physical examination may reveal a palpable mass and bright blood in the rectum. Adenopathy, hepatomegaly, or pulmonary signs may be present with metastatic disease.[] Laboratory examination may reveal iron-deficiency anemia and electrolyte and liver function abnormalities.

Prognostic Factors

The prognosis of patients with rectal cancer is related to several factors, including the following:[,]

  • Tumor adherence to or invasion of adjacent organs.[]
  • Presence or absence of tumor involvement in the lymph nodes and the number of positive lymph nodes.[,]
  • Presence or absence of distant metastases.[,]
  • Perforation or obstruction of the bowel.[,]
  • Presence or absence of high-risk pathologic features, including the following:[,,]
  • Positive surgical margins.
  • Lymphovascular invasion.
  • Perineural invasion.
  • Poorly differentiated histology.
  • Circumferential resection margin (CRM) or depth of penetration of the tumor through the bowel wall.[,,] Measured in millimeters, CRM is defined as the retroperitoneal or peritoneal adventitial soft-tissue margin closest to the deepest penetration of tumor.

Only disease stage (designated by tumor [T], nodal status [N], and distant metastasis [M]) has been validated as a prognostic factor in multi-institutional prospective studies.[] A major pooled analysis evaluating the impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in patients with rectal cancer who are treated with adjuvant therapy has been published and confirms these findings.[]

Follow-up After Treatment

The primary goals of postoperative surveillance programs for rectal cancer are:[]

  • To assess the efficacy of initial therapy.
  • To detect new or metachronous malignancies.
  • To detect potentially curable recurrent or metastatic cancers.

Routine, periodic studies following treatment for rectal cancer may lead to earlier identification and management of recurrent disease.[] A statistically significant survival benefit has been demonstrated for more intensive follow-up protocols in two clinical trials. A meta-analysis that combined these two trials with four others reported a statistically significant improvement in survival for patients who were intensively followed.[,,]

Guidelines for surveillance after initial treatment with curative intent for colorectal cancer vary between leading U.S. and European oncology societies, and optimal surveillance strategies remain uncertain.[,] Large, well-designed, prospective, multi-institutional, randomized studies are required to establish an evidence-based consensus for follow-up evaluation.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)

Measurement of CEA, a serum glycoprotein, is frequently used in the management and follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. A review of the use of this tumor marker for rectal cancer suggests the following:[]

  • Serum CEA testing is not a valuable screening tool for rectal cancer because of its low sensitivity and low specificity.
  • Postoperative CEA testing is typically restricted to patients who are potential candidates for further intervention, as follows:
  • Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer (every 2–3 months for at least 2 years after diagnosis).
  • Patients with rectal cancer who would be candidates for resection of liver metastases.

In one Dutch retrospective study of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer, investigators found that the preoperative serum CEA level was normal in the majority of patients with rectal cancer, and yet, serum CEA levels rose by at least 50% in patients with recurrence. The authors concluded that serial, postoperative CEA testing cannot be discarded based on a normal preoperative serum CEA level in patients with rectal cancer.[,]

Cellular Classification and Pathology of Rectal Cancer

Adenocarcinomas account for the vast majority of rectal tumors in the United States. Other histologic types account for an estimated 2% to 5% of colorectal tumors.[]

The World Health Organization classification of tumors of the colon and rectum includes the following:[]

Epithelial Tumors

Adenoma

  • Tubular.
  • Villous.
  • Tubulovillous.
  • Serrated.

Carcinoma

  • Adenocarcinoma.
  • Mucinous adenocarcinoma.
  • Signet-ring cell carcinoma.
  • Small cell carcinoma.
  • Adenosquamous carcinoma.
  • Medullary carcinoma.
  • Undifferentiated carcinoma.

Carcinoid (well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasm)

  • Enterochromaffin-cell, serotonin-producing neoplasm.
  • L-cell, glucagon-like peptide and pancreatic polypeptide/peptide YY–producing tumor.
  • Others.

Intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia) associated with chronic inflammatory diseases

  • Low-grade glandular intraepithelial neoplasia.
  • High-grade glandular intraepithelial neoplasia.

Mixed carcinoma-adenocarcinoma

  • Others.

Nonepithelial Tumors

  • Lipoma.
  • Leiomyoma.
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. (Refer to the PDQ summary on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treatment (Adult) for more information.)
  • Leiomyosarcoma.
  • Angiosarcoma.
  • Kaposi sarcoma. (Refer to the PDQ summary on Kaposi Sarcoma Treatment for more information.)
  • Melanoma. (Refer to the PDQ summary on Melanoma Treatment for more information.)
  • Others.

Malignant lymphomas

  • Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type.
  • Mantle cell lymphoma.
  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
  • Burkitt lymphoma.
  • Burkitt-like/atypical Burkitt lymphoma.

Stage Information for Colorectal Carcinoma

Accurate staging provides crucial information about the location and size of the primary tumor in the rectum, and, if present, the size, number, and location of any metastases. Accurate initial staging can influence therapy by helping to determine the type of surgical intervention and the choice of neoadjuvant therapy to maximize the likelihood of resection with clear margins. In primary rectal cancer, pelvic imaging helps determine the following:[ –]

  • The depth of tumor invasion.
  • The distance from the sphincter complex.
  • The potential for achieving negative circumferential (radial) margins.
  • The involvement of locoregional lymph nodes or adjacent organs.

Staging Evaluation

Clinical evaluation and staging procedures may include the following:

  • Digital-rectal examination (DRE): DRE and/or rectovaginal exam and rigid proctoscopy to determine if sphincter-saving surgery is possible.[,,]
  • Colonoscopy: Complete colonoscopy to rule out cancers elsewhere in the bowel.[]
  • Computed tomography (CT): Pan-body CT scan to rule out metastatic disease.[]
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): MRI of the abdomen and pelvis to determine the depth of penetration and the potential for achieving negative circumferential (radial) margins and to identify locoregional nodal metastases and distant metastatic disease. MRI may be particularly helpful in determining sacral involvement in local recurrence.[]
  • Endorectal ultrasound: Endorectal ultrasound with a rigid probe or a flexible scope for stenotic lesions to determine the depth of penetration and identify locoregional nodal metastases.[,]
  • Positron emission tomography (PET): PET to image distant metastatic disease.[]
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA): Measurement of the serum CEA level for prognostic assessment and the determination of response to therapy.[,]

AJCC Stage Groupings and TNM Definitions

The AJCC has designated staging by TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) classification to define rectal cancer.[] The same classification is used for both clinical and pathologic staging.[] Treatment decisions are made with reference to the TNM classification system, rather than the older Dukes or Modified Astler-Coller classification schema.

Cancers staged using this staging system include adenocarcinomas, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas, and squamous carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Cancers not staged using this staging system include these histopathologic types of cancer: appendiceal carcinomas, anal carcinomas, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids).[]

Lymph node status

The AJCC and a National Cancer Institute-sponsored panel suggested that at least 10 to 14 lymph nodes be examined in radical colon and rectum resections in patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. In cases in which a tumor is resected for palliation or in patients who have received preoperative radiation therapy, fewer lymph nodes may be present.[] This takes into consideration that the number of lymph nodes examined is a reflection of both the aggressiveness of lymphovascular mesenteric dissection at the time of surgical resection and the pathologic identification of nodes in the specimen.

Retrospective studies, such as Intergroup trial INT-0089 (NCT00201331), have demonstrated that the number of lymph nodes examined during colon and rectal surgery may be associated with patient outcome.[] A new tumor-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive rectal cancer has been proposed.[]

Treatment Option Overview for Colorectal Carcinoma

The management of rectal cancer varies somewhat from that of colon cancer because of the increased risk of local recurrence and a poorer overall prognosis. Differences include surgical technique, the use of radiation therapy, and the method of chemotherapy administration. In addition to determining the intent of rectal cancer surgery (i.e., curative or palliative), it is important to consider therapeutic issues related to the maintenance or restoration of normal anal sphincter, genitourinary function, and sexual function.[,]

The approach to the management of rectal cancer is multimodal and involves a multidisciplinary team of cancer specialists with expertise in gastroenterology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and radiology.

Table 6. Standard Treatment Options for Stages 0–III Rectal Cancer

Stage (TNM Definitions) Standard Treatment Options
Stage 0 Rectal Cancer Polypectomy or surgery
Stage I Rectal Cancer Surgery with or without chemoradiation therapy
Stages II and III Rectal Cancer Surgery
Preoperative chemoradiation therapy
Short-course preoperative radiation therapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy
Postoperative chemoradiation therapy
Primary chemoradiation therapy followed by intensive surveillance for complete clinical responders

Table 7. Treatment Options for Stage IV and Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Stage (TNM Definitions) Treatment Options
Stage IV and Recurrent Rectal Cancer Surgery with or without chemotherapy or radiation therapy
First-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy
Second-line chemotherapy
Palliative therapy
Liver Metastases Surgery
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Local ablation
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Intra-arterial chemotherapy after liver resection

Primary Surgical Therapy

The primary treatment for patients with rectal cancer is surgical resection of the primary tumor. The surgical approach to treatment varies according to the following:

  • Tumor location.
  • Stage of disease.
  • Presence or absence of high-risk features (i.e., positive margins, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and poorly differentiated histology).

Types of surgical resection include the following:[]

  • Polypectomy for select T1 cancers.
  • Transanal local excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for select clinically staged T1/T2 N0 rectal cancers.
  • Total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation techniques via low-anterior resection.
  • Total mesorectal excision via abdominoperineal resection for patients who are not candidates for sphincter-preservation, leaving patients with a permanent end-colostomy.

Polypectomy alone may be used in certain instances (T1) in which polyps with invasive cancer can be completely resected with clear margins and have favorable histologic features.[,]

Local excision of clinical T1 tumors is an acceptable surgical technique for appropriately selected patients. For all other tumors, a mesorectal excision is the treatment of choice. Very select patients with T2 tumors may be candidates for local excision. Local failure rates in the range of 4% to 8% after rectal resection with appropriate mesorectal excision (total mesorectal excision for low/middle rectal tumors and mesorectal excision at least 5 cm below the tumor for high rectal tumors) have been reported.[]

For patients with advanced cancers of the mid- to upper rectum, low-anterior resection followed by the creation of a colorectal anastomosis may be the treatment of choice. For locally advanced rectal cancers for which radical resection is indicated, however, total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation techniques via low-anterior resection is preferable to abdominoperineal resection.[,]

The low incidence of local relapse after meticulous mesorectal excision has led some investigators to question the routine use of adjuvant radiation therapy. Because of an increased tendency for first failure in locoregional sites only, the impact of perioperative radiation therapy is greater in rectal cancer than in colon cancer.[]

Chemoradiation Therapy

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy

Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, using preoperative chemoradiation therapy, is the preferred treatment option for patients with stages II and III disease. However, postoperative chemoradiation therapy for patients with stage II or III rectal cancer remains an acceptable option.[]

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy has become the standard of care for patients with clinically staged T3–T4 or node-positive disease (stages II/III), based on the results of several studies:

  • German Rectal Cancer Study Group trial.[]
  • National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-03 trial NSABP R-03 (NCT00410579).[][Level of evidence: 1iiA] (Refer to the Stages II and III Rectal Cancer section of this summary for more information.)

Multiple phase II and III studies examined the benefits of preoperative chemoradiation therapy, which include the following:[]

  • Tumor regression and downstaging of the tumor.
  • Improved tumor resectability.
  • Higher rate of local control.
  • Improved toxicity profile of chemoradiation therapy.
  • Higher rate of sphincter preservation.

Complete pathologic response rates of 10% to 25% may be achieved with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.[] However, preoperative radiation therapy is associated with increased complications compared with surgery alone; some patients with cancers at a lower risk of local recurrence might be adequately treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.[]

(Refer to the Preoperative chemoradiation therapy section in the Stages II and III Rectal Cancer section of this summary for more information about these studies.)

Postoperative chemoradiation therapy

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy is the current standard of care for stages II and III rectal cancer. However, before 1990, the following studies noted an increase in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with the use of postoperative combined-modality therapy:

  1. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group trial (GITSG-7175).
  2. The Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial (NCCTG-794751).
  3. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial (NSABP-R-01).

Subsequent studies have attempted to increase the survival benefit by improving radiation sensitization and by identifying the optimal chemotherapeutic agents and delivery systems.

Fluorouracil (5-FU): The following studies examined optimal delivery methods for adjuvant 5-FU:

  1. Intergroup protocol 86-47-51 trial (MAYO-864751).[][Level of evidence: 1iiA]
  2. Intergroup 0114 trial (INT-0114 [CLB-9081]).[][Level of evidence: 1iiA]
  3. Intergroup 0144.[]

(Refer to the Stages II and III Rectal Cancer section of this summary for detailed information about these study results.)

Acceptable postoperative chemoradiation therapy for patients with stage II or III rectal cancer not enrolled in clinical trials includes continuous-infusion 5-FU during 45 Gy to 55 Gy pelvic radiation and four cycles of adjuvant maintenance chemotherapy with bolus 5-FU with or without modulation with leucovorin (LV).

Findings from the NSABP-R-01 trial compared surgery alone with surgery followed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy.[] Subsequently, the NSABP-R-02 (NCT00410579) study, addressed whether adding postoperative radiation therapy to chemotherapy would enhance the survival advantage reported in R-01.[][Level of evidence: 1iiA]

In the NSABP-R-02 study, the addition of radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence at 5 years (8% for chemotherapy and radiation vs. 13% for chemotherapy alone, P = .02) but failed to demonstrate a significant survival benefit. Radiation therapy appeared to improve survival among patients younger than 60 years and among patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection.

While this trial has initiated discussion in the oncologic community about the proper role of postoperative radiation therapy, omission of radiation therapy seems premature because of the serious complications of locoregional recurrence.

Chemotherapy regimens

Table 8 describes the chemotherapy regimens used to treat rectal cancer.

Table 8. Drug Combinations Used to Treat Rectal Cancer

Regimen Name Drug Combination Dose
AIO or German AIO Folic acid, also known as LV, 5-FU, and irinotecan Irinotecan (100 mg/m2) and LV (500 mg/m2) administered as 2-h infusions on d 1, followed by 5-FU (2,000 mg/m2) IV bolus administered via ambulatory pump weekly over 24 h, 4 times a y (52 wk).
CAPOX Capecitabine and oxaliplatin Capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2) bid on d 1–14, plus oxaliplatin (70 mg/m2) on d 1 and 8 every 3 wk.
Douillard Folic acid, 5-FU, and irinotecan Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) administered as a 2-h infusion on d 1, LV (200 mg/m2) administered as a 2-h infusion on d 1 and 2, followed by a loading dose of 5-FU (400 mg/m2) IV bolus, then 5-FU (600 mg/m2) administered via ambulatory pump over 22 h every 2 wk on d 1 and 2.
FOLFIRI LV, 5-FU, and irinotecan Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) and LV (400 mg/m2) administered as 2-h infusions on d 1, followed by a loading dose of 5-FU (400 mg/m2) IV bolus administered on d 1, then 5-FU (2,400–3,000 mg/m2) administered via ambulatory pump over 46 h every 2 wk.
FOLFOX4 Oxaliplatin, LV, and 5-FU Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) administered as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV (200 mg/m2) administered as a 2-h infusion on d 1 and 2, followed by a loading dose of 5-FU (400 mg/m2) IV bolus, then 5-FU (600 mg/m2) administered via ambulatory pump over 22 h every 2 wk on d 1 and 2.
FOLFOX6 Oxaliplatin, LV, and 5-FU Oxaliplatin (85–100 mg/m2) and LV (400 mg/m2) administered as 2-h infusions on d 1, followed by a loading dose of 5-FU (400 mg/m2) IV bolus on d 1, then 5-FU (2,400–3,000 mg/m2) administered via ambulatory pump over 46 h every 2 wk.
FOLFOXIRI Irinotecan, oxaliplatin, LV, 5-FU Irinotecan (165 mg/m2) administered as a 60-min infusion, then concomitant infusion of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and LV (200 mg/m2) over 120 min, followed by 5-FU (3,200 mg/m2) administered as a 48-h continuous infusion.
FUFOX 5-FU, LV, and oxaliplatin Oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2) plus LV (500 mg/m2) plus 5-FU (2,000 mg/m2) administered as a 22-h continuous infusion on d 1, 8, 22, and 29 every 36 d.
FUOX 5-FU plus oxaliplatin 5-FU (2,250 mg/m2) administered as a continuous infusion over 48 h on d 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 plus oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) on d 1, 15, and 29 every 6 wk.
IFL (or Saltz) Irinotecan, 5-FU, and LV Irinotecan (125 mg/m2) plus 5-FU (500 mg/m2) IV bolus and LV (20 mg/m2) IV bolus administered weekly for 4 out of 6 wk.
XELOX Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin Oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2) administered bid for 14 d plus oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on d 1 every 3 wk.

5-FU = fluorouracil; AIO = Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie; bid = twice a day; IV = intravenous; LV = leucovorin.

Treatment toxicity

The acute side effects of pelvic radiation therapy for rectal cancer are mainly the result of gastrointestinal toxicity, are self-limiting, and usually resolve within 4 to 6 weeks of completing treatment.

Of greater concern is the potential for late morbidity after rectal cancer treatment. Patients who undergo aggressive surgical procedures for rectal cancer can have chronic symptoms, particularly if there is impairment of the anal sphincter.[] Patients treated with radiation therapy appear to have increased chronic bowel dysfunction, anorectal sphincter dysfunction (if the sphincter was surgically preserved), and sexual dysfunction than do patients who undergo surgical resection alone.[,]

An analysis of patients treated with postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy suggests that these patients may have more chronic bowel dysfunction than do patients who undergo surgical resection alone.[] A Cochrane review highlights the risks of increased surgical morbidity as well as late rectal and sexual function in association with radiation therapy.[]

Improved radiation therapy planning and techniques may minimize these acute and late treatment-related complications. These techniques include the following:[]

  • The use of high-energy radiation machines.
  • The use of multiple pelvic radiation fields.
  • Prone patient positioning.
  • Customized patient molds (belly boards) to exclude as much small bowel as possible from the radiation fields and immobilize patients during treatment.
  • Bladder distention during radiation therapy to exclude as much small bowel as possible from the radiation fields.
  • Visualization of the small bowel through oral contrast during treatment planning so that when possible, the small bowel can be excluded from the radiation field.
  • The use of 3-dimensional or other advanced radiation planning techniques.

In Europe, it is common to deliver preoperative radiation therapy alone in one week (5 Gy × five daily treatments) followed by surgery one week later, rather than the long-course chemoradiation approach used in the United States. One reason for this difference is the concern in the United States for heightened late effects when high radiation doses per fraction are given.

Stage 0 Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment

Standard Treatment Options for Stage 0 Rectal Cancer

Stage 0 rectal cancer or carcinoma in situ is the most superficial of all rectal lesions and is limited to the mucosa without invasion of the lamina propria.

Standard treatment options for stage 0 rectal cancer include the following:

  1. Polypectomy or surgery.

Polypectomy or surgery

Local excision or simple polypectomy may be indicated for stage 0 rectal cancer tumors.[] Because of its localized nature at presentation, stage 0 rectal cancer has a high cure rate. For large lesions not amenable to local excision, full-thickness rectal resection by the transanal or transcoccygeal route may be performed.

Stage I  Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment

Standard Treatment Options for Stage I Rectal Cancer

Stage I tumors extend beneath the mucosa into the submucosa (T1) or into, but not through, the bowel muscle wall (T2). Because of its localized nature at presentation, stage I rectal cancer has a high cure rate.

Standard treatment options for stage I rectal cancer include the following:

  1. Surgery with or without chemoradiation therapy.

Surgery with or without chemoradiation therapy

There are three potential options for surgical resection in stage I rectal cancer:

  • Local excision. Local excision is restricted to tumors that are confined to the rectal wall and that do not, on rectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, involve the full thickness of the rectum (i.e., are not T3 tumors). The ideal candidate for local excision has a T1 tumor with well-to-moderate differentiation that occupies less than one-third of the circumference of the bowel wall. Local excision is associated with a higher risk of local and systemic failure and is applicable to only very select patients with T2 tumors. Local transanal or other resection [,] with or without perioperative external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) may be indicated.
  • Low-anterior resection. Wide surgical resection and anastomosis are options when an adequate low-anterior resection can be performed with sufficient distal rectum to allow a conventional anastomosis or coloanal anastomosis.
  • Abdominoperineal resection. Wide surgical resection with abdominoperineal resection is used for lesions too distal to permit low-anterior resection.

Patients with tumors that are pathologically T1 may not need postoperative therapy. Patients with tumors that are T2 or greater have lymph node involvement about 20% of the time. Patients may want to consider additional therapy, such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy, or wide surgical resection of the rectum.[] Patients with poor histologic features or positive margins after local excision may consider low-anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection and postoperative treatment as dictated by full surgical staging.

For patients with T1 and T2 tumors, no randomized trials are available to compare local excision with or without postoperative chemoradiation therapy to wide surgical resection (low-anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection).

Evidence (surgery)

Investigators with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B enrolled patients with T1 and T2 rectal adenocarcinomas that were within 10 cm of the dentate line and not more than 4 cm in diameter, and involving not more than 40% of the rectal circumference, onto a prospective protocol, CLB-8984. Patients with T1 tumors received no additional treatment after surgery, whereas patients with T2 tumors were treated with EBRT (54 Gy in 30 fractions, 5 days/week) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2 on days 1 through 2 and days 29 through 31 of radiation therapy).[]

  • For patients with T1 tumors, at 48 months median follow-up, the 6-year failure-free survival was 83% and overall survival (OS) rate was 87%.
  • For patients with T2 tumors, the 6-year failure-free survival was 71% and the OS rate was 85%.

Stages II and III  Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment

Standard Treatment Options for Stages II and III Rectal Cancer

Standard treatment options for stages II and III rectal cancer include the following:

  • Surgery.
  • Preoperative chemoradiation therapy.
  • Short-course preoperative radiation therapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy.
  • Postoperative chemoradiation therapy.
  • Primary chemoradiation therapy followed by intensive surveillance for complete clinical responders.

Surgery

Total mesorectal excision with either low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection is usually performed for stages II and III rectal cancer before or after chemoradiation therapy.

Retrospective studies have demonstrated that some patients with pathological T3, N0 disease treated with surgery and no additional therapy have a very low risk of local and systemic recurrence.[]

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy has become the standard of care for patients with clinically staged T3 or T4 or node-positive disease, based on the results of several studies.

Evidence (preoperative chemoradiation therapy)

The German Rectal Cancer Study Group (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 [Working Group of Surgical Oncology/Working Group of Radiation Oncology/Working Group of Medical Oncology of the Germany Cancer Society]) randomly assigned 823 patients with ultrasound-staged T3 or T4 or lymph node-positive rectal cancer to either preoperative chemoradiation therapy or postoperative chemoradiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions to the tumor and pelvic lymph nodes concurrent with infusional fluorouracil [5-FU] 1,000 mg/mdaily for 5 days during the first and fifth weeks of radiation therapy).[][Level of evidence: 1iA] All patients underwent total mesorectal excision and received four additional cycles of 5-FU–based chemotherapy.

  • The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% for preoperative chemoradiation therapy and 74% for postoperative chemoradiation therapy (P = .80). The 5-year cumulative incidence of local relapse was 6% for patients assigned to the preoperative chemoradiation therapy group and 13% for patients in the postoperative chemoradiation therapy group (P = .006).
  • Grade 3 or 4 acute toxic effects occurred in 27% of patients in the preoperative-treatment group and in 40% of patients in the postoperative-treatment group (P = .001); the corresponding rates of long-term toxic effects were 14% and 24%, respectively (P = .01).
  • The same number of patients underwent abdominoperineal resection in each arm. However, among the 194 patients with tumors that were determined by the surgeon before randomization to require an abdominoperineal excision, a statistically significant increase in sphincter preservation was achieved among patients who received preoperative chemoradiation therapy (P = .004). These results have now been updated with a median follow-up of 11 years.[]
  • The 10-year OS was equivalent in both arms, (59.6% in the preoperative group vs. 59.9% in the postoperative group; P = .85). However, a local control benefit persists among patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy compared with patients treated with postoperative chemoradiation therapy (10-year cumulative incidence of local relapse: 7.1% in the preoperative group vs. 10.1% in the postoperative group; P = .048). There were no significant differences detected for 10-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases or disease-free survival (DFS).[]
  • Among the patients assigned to the postoperative chemoradiation therapy treatment arm, 18% actually had pathologically determined stage I disease and were overestimated by endorectal ultrasound to have T3 or T4 or N1 disease. A similar number of patients were possibly overtreated in the preoperative treatment group.

The NSABP R-03 (NCT00410579) trial similarly compared preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation therapy for patients with clinically staged T3 or T4 or lymph node-positive rectal cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) with 45 Gy in 25 fractions with a 5.4 Gy boost. Although the intended sample size was 900 patients, the study with 267 patients closed early because of poor accrual.[][Level of evidence: 1iiA]

  • With a median follow-up of 8.4 years, preoperative chemoradiation therapy was found to confer a significant improvement in 5-year DFS (64.7% vs. 53.4% for postoperative patients; P = .011).
  • Similar to the German Rectal Cancer Study, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment arms (74.5% for preoperative chemoradiation therapy vs. 65.6% for postoperative chemoradiation therapy; P =. 065).
Short-course preoperative radiation therapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy

The use of short-course radiation therapy before surgery has been a standard approach in parts of Europe and Australia.

Evidence (short-course preoperative radiation therapy):

  • The use of short-course radiation therapy was evaluated in a randomized study in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (NCT00337545).[][Level of evidence: 1iiA] In the trial, 1,168 patients younger than 80 years with stage I to stage III resectable rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive preoperative radiation therapy (25 Gy in five fractions) or to undergo immediate surgery. Patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

    • The 5-year OS rate was 58% in the radiation therapy group and 48% in the surgery group (P = .005).
    • The rate of local control was 11% in the radiation therapy group and 27% in the surgery group (P < .001).
    Subsequently, the Polish Rectal Trial and the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) compared short-course preoperative radiation therapy with the standard long-course preoperative chemoradiation therapy administered with 5-FU.
  • In the Polish Rectal Trial, 312 patients with clinical stage T3 or T4 rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive preoperative radiation therapy (25 Gy in five fractions) followed by total mesorectal excision within 7 days, 6 months of adjuvant 5-FU/LV or preoperative chemoradiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent bolus 5-FU/LV), total mesorectal excision in 4 to 6 weeks after completion of radiation therapy, and 4 months of adjuvant 5-FU/LV.[] The primary endpoint of the study was to detect a difference of at least 15% in sphincter preservation with a power of 80%.

    • The rates of sphincter preservation were 61.2% in the short-course group and 58% in the chemoradiation therapy group (P = .570).
    • The actuarial 4-year survival rate was 67.2% in the short-course group and 66.2% in the chemoradiation therapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–1.48; P = .960).
    • The HR for local recurrence in the short-course group compared with the chemoradiation therapy group was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.32–1.28; P = .210).
    • There was no difference in late toxicity between the short-course group and the chemoradiation therapy group.
  • In the TROG trial (TROG 01.04 [NCT00145769]), 326 patients with ultrasound-staged or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–staged T3, N0 to N2, M0 rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from the anal verge were randomly assigned to receive short-course radiation therapy (25 Gy in five fractions) followed by surgery 3 to 7 days later or long-course chemoradiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent continuous infusional 5-FU) followed by surgery in 4 to 6 weeks. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU/LV) after surgery. The trial was designed to have 80% power to detect a 10% difference in local recurrence at 3 years with a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance.[]

    • Cumulative incidence of local recurrence at 3 years was 7.5% for the short-course group and 4.4% for the long-course group (P = .24).
    • OS at 5 years was 74% for the short-course group and 70% for the long-course group (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.76–1.67; P = .62).
  • The Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom and the National Cancer Institute of Canada built on the short-course experience and conducted a randomized study (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016 [NCT00003422]) that compared short-course preoperative radiation therapy with selective postoperative chemoradiation therapy.[] In the trial, 1,350 patients from 80 centers who had resectable rectal adenocarcinomas that were less than 15 cm from the anal verge were randomly assigned. Of note, pelvic MRI or ultrasound was not mandated. Patients randomly assigned to short-course radiation therapy received 25 Gy in five fractions followed by total mesorectal excision and then adjuvant chemotherapy according to the local center policy about nodal and margin status. Patients randomly assigned to selective postoperative chemoradiation therapy received immediate surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiation (45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent 5-FU) if their circumferential resection margin was 1 mm or smaller. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the group that received selective chemoradiation therapy was again given on the basis of local standards regarding nodal and margin status.[]

    • The risk of local recurrence at 3 years was 4.4% in the preoperative short-course group and 10.6% in the selective chemoradiation therapy group (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27–0.58; P < .0001).
    • OS did not differ between the groups.

Taken together, these studies demonstrate that short-course preoperative radiation therapy and long-course preoperative chemoradiation therapy are both reasonable treatment strategies for patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma.

Postoperative chemoradiation therapy

Progress in the development of postoperative treatment regimens relates to the integration of systemic chemotherapy and radiation therapy, as well as redefining the techniques for both modalities. The efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy and 5-FU-based chemotherapy for stages II and III rectal cancer was established by a series of prospective, randomized clinical trials, including the following:[]

  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG-7175).
  • Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG-794751).
  • National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-R-01).

These studies demonstrated an increase in DFS interval and OS when radiation therapy was combined with chemotherapy after surgical resection. After the publication in 1990 of the results of these trials, experts at a National Cancer Institute-sponsored Consensus Development Conference recommended postoperative combined-modality treatment for patients with stages II and III rectal carcinomas.[] Since that time, preoperative chemoradiation therapy has become the standard of care, although postoperative chemoradiation therapy is still an acceptable alternative. (Refer to the Preoperative chemoradiation therapy section of this summary for more information.)

Additional evidence (postoperative chemoradiation therapy):

  • Intergroup protocol 86-47-51 (MAYO-864751) compared continuous-infusion 5-FU (225 mg/m2/day throughout the entire course of radiation therapy) with bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days during the first and fifth weeks of radiation therapy).[][]

    • A 10% improvement in OS was demonstrated with the use of continuous-infusion 5-FU.
  • A three-arm randomized trial, determined whether continuous-infusion 5-FU given throughout the entire standard six-cycle course of adjuvant chemotherapy was more effective than continuous infusion 5-FU given only during pelvic radiation therapy. Median follow-up was 5.7 years.[]

    1. Arm 1 received bolus 5-FU in two 5-day cycles before (500 mg/m2/day) and after (450 mg/m2/day) radiation therapy, with protracted venous infusion 5-FU (225 mg/m2/day) during radiation therapy.
    2. Arm 2 received continuous infusion 5-FU before (300 mg/m2/day for 42 days), after (300 mg/m2/day for 56 days), and during (225 mg/m2/day) radiation therapy.
    3. Arm 3 received bolus 5-FU/LV in two 5-day cycles before (5-FU, 425 mg/m2/day; LV, 20 mg/m2/day) and after (5-FU, 380 mg/m2/day; LV, 20 mg/m2/day) radiation therapy, and bolus 5-FU/LV (5-FU, 400 mg/m2/day; LV, 20 mg/m2/day; days 1 to 4, every 28 days) during radiation therapy. Levamisole (150 mg/day) was administered in 3-day cycles every 14 days before and after radiation therapy.

      • No DFS, OS, or locoregional failure difference was detected (across all arms: 3-year DFS, 67%–69%; 3-year OS, 81%–83%; locoregional failure, 4.6%–8%).
      • Lethal toxicity was less than 1%, with grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity in 55% of patients in arm 1 and in 49% of the patients in arm 3, versus in 4% of patients in the continuous-infusion arm.[][]
  • The final study results of Intergroup trial 0114 (INT-0114) showed no survival or local-control benefit with the addition of LV, levamisole, or both to 5-FU administered postoperatively for patients with stages II and III rectal cancers at a median follow-up of 7.4 years.[][]
  • A pooled analysis of 3,791 patients enrolled in clinical trials demonstrated that, for patients with T3, N0 disease, the 5-year OS rate with surgery plus chemotherapy (OS, 84%) compared favorably with the survival rates of patients treated with surgery plus radiation therapy and bolus chemotherapy (OS, 76%) or surgery plus radiation therapy and protracted-infusion chemotherapy (OS, 80%).[]

Chemotherapy Regimens of Colorectal Carcinoma

Many academic oncologists suggest that LV/5-FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) be considered the standard for adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer. However, there are no data about rectal cancer to support this consideration. FOLFOX has become the standard arm in the latest Intergroup study evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial (ECOG-E5202 [NCT00217737]) randomly assigned patients with stage II or III rectal cancer who received preoperative or postoperative chemoradiation therapy to receive 6 months of FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab, but this trial closed because of poor accrual; no efficacy data are available.

Preoperative oxaliplatin with chemoradiation therapy

Oxaliplatin has also been shown to have radiosensitizing properties in preclinical models.[] Phase II studies that combined oxaliplatin with fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation therapy have reported pathologic complete response rates ranging from 14% to 30%.[] Data from multiple studies have demonstrated a correlation between rates of pathologic complete response and endpoints including distant metastasis-free survival, DFS, and OS.[]

There is no current role for off-trial use of concurrent oxaliplatin and radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with rectal cancer.

Evidence (preoperative oxaliplatin with chemoradiation therapy)

The ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2 (NCT00227747) trial, which randomly assigned 598 patients with clinically staged T2 or T3 or resectable T4 rectal cancer accessible by digital rectal examination to either preoperative radiation therapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks) with capecitabine (800 mg/m2 twice daily 5 of every 7 days) or to a higher dose of radiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks) with the same dose of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2 weekly). Total mesorectal excision was performed in 98% of both groups at a median interval of 6 weeks after chemoradiation therapy was completed.[]

  • Pathologic complete response was the primary endpoint (albeit never validated as a true surrogate of OS). A higher percentage of patients achieved a pathologic complete response in the oxaliplatin-treated group (19.2% vs. 13.9%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = .09).
  • The rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was significantly higher in the oxaliplatin-treated group (25% vs. 11%; P < .001), and there was no difference in the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery (75% vs. 78%).

Similarly, the STAR-01 trial investigated the role of oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.[][] This Italian study randomly assigned 747 patients with resectable, locally advanced, clinically staged T3 or T4 and/or clinical N1 to N2 adenocarcinoma of the mid- to low-rectum to receive either continuous-infusion 5-FU with radiation therapy or to receive the same regimen in combination with oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2). Although the primary endpoint was OS, a protocol-planned analysis of response to preoperative therapy has been preliminarily reported.

  • The rate of pathologic complete response was equivalent at 16% in both arms (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.66–1.44; P = .904).
  • There was no difference noted in the rate of pathologically positive lymph nodes, tumor infiltration beyond the muscularis propria, or the rate of circumferential margin positivity.
  • An increase in grades 3 to 4 treatment-related acute toxicity was noted with the addition of oxaliplatin (24% vs. 8%; P <.001). Longer-term outcomes including OS have not yet been reported.

The NSABP-R-04 (NCT00058474) trial randomly assigned 1,608 patients with clinically staged T3 or T4 or clinical node-positive adenocarcinoma within 12 cm of the anal verge in a 2 × 2 factorial design to one of the following four treatment groups:

  • Intravenous (IV) continuous infusion 5-FU with radiation therapy.
  • Capecitabine with radiation therapy.
  • IV continuous infusion 5-FU plus weekly oxaliplatin with radiation therapy.
  • Capecitabine plus weekly oxaliplatin with radiation therapy.

The primary objective of this study is locoregional disease control.[][] Preliminary results, reported in abstract form at the 2011 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, demonstrated the following:

  • There was no significant difference in the rates of pathologic complete response, sphincter-sparing surgery, or surgical downstaging between the 5-FU and capecitabine regimens or between the regimens with and without oxaliplatin.
  • Patients treated with oxaliplatin had significantly higher rates of grade 3 and grade 4 acute toxicity (15.4% vs. 6.6%; P < .001).

The German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial randomly assigned 1,236 patients with clinically staged T3 to T4 or clinical lymph node-positive adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from the anal verge to receive either concurrent chemoradiation therapy with 5-FU (week 1 and week 5) or concurrent chemoradiation therapy with 5-FU daily (250 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2).[][Level of evidence: 1iiD]

  • In contrast to the previous studies, a significantly higher rate of pathologic complete response was achieved in patients who received oxaliplatin (17% vs. 13%; P = .038).
  • There was no significant difference in rates of overall grades 3 and 4 toxicity; however, diarrhea and nausea and vomiting were more common among those treated with oxaliplatin.
  • The 5-FU schedules in this study differed between the two arms, which may have contributed to the difference in outcomes noted. Longer follow-up will be necessary to determine the effect on the primary endpoint of the study, DFS.

Postoperative oxaliplatin-containing regimens

On the basis of results of several studies, oxaliplatin as a radiation sensitizer does not appear to add any benefit in terms of primary tumor response, and it has been associated with increased acute treatment-related toxicity. The question of whether oxaliplatin should be added to adjuvant 5-FU/LV for postoperative management of stages II and III rectal cancer is an ongoing debate. There are no randomized phase III studies to support the use of oxaliplatin for the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. However, the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU/LV for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer is now considered standard care.

Evidence (postoperative oxaliplatin)

In the randomized Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5-Fluorouracil/LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer (MOSAIC) study, the toxic effects and efficacy of FOLFOX4 (a 2-hour infusion of 200 mg/m2 LV, followed by a bolus of 400 mg/m2 5-FU, and then a 22-hour infusion of 600 mg/m2 5-FU on 2 consecutive days every 14 days for 12 cycles, plus a 2-hour infusion of 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1, given simultaneously with LV) were compared with the same 5-FU/LV regimen without oxaliplatin when administered for 6 months. Each arm of the trial included 1,123 patients.[]

  • Preliminary results of the study, with 37 months of follow-up, demonstrated a significant improvement in DFS at 3 years in favor of FOLFOX4 (77.8% vs. 72.9%; P = .01). When initially reported, there was no difference in OS.[][]
  • Further follow-up at 6 years demonstrated that the OS for all patients (both stage II and stage III) entered into the study was not significantly different (OS, 78.5% FOLFOX4 vs. 76.0% 5-FU/LV group; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71–1.00).

    • On subset analysis, the 6-year OS in patients with stage III colon cancer was 72.9% in the patients who received FOLFOX4 and 68.9% in the patients who received 5-FU/LV (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65–0.97; P = .023).[][]
    • Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced more frequent toxic effects, consisting mainly of neutropenia (41% > grade 3) and reversible peripheral sensory neuropathy (12.4% > grade 3).

The results of the completed NSABP-C-07 study confirmed and extended the results of the MOSAIC trial.[] In NSABP C-07, 2,492 patients with stage II or III colon or rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either FLOX (2-hour IV infusion of 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on days 1, 15, and 29 of each 8-week treatment cycle, followed by a 2-hour IV infusion of 500 mg/m2 LV plus bolus 500 mg/m2 5-FU 1 hour after the start of the LV infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, followed by a 2-week rest period, for a total of three cycles [24 weeks]) or the same chemotherapy without oxaliplatin (Roswell Park regimen).

  • The 3- and 4-year DFS rates were 71.8% and 67% for the Roswell Park regimen and 76.1% and 73.2% for FLOX, respectively.
  • The HR was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69–0.93), a 20% risk reduction in favor of FLOX (P < .004).

It is unclear whether the results of these colon cancer trials can be applied to the management of patients with rectal cancer. There are no randomized phase III studies to support the routine practice of administering FOLFOX as adjuvant therapy to patients with rectal cancer.

Primary chemoradiation therapy followed by intensive surveillance for complete clinical responders

Since the advent of preoperative chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer, the standard approach has been to recommend definitive surgical resection by either abdominoperineal resection or laparoscopic-assisted resection. In most series, after long-course chemoradiation therapy, 10% to 20% of patients will have a complete clinical response in which there is no sign of persistent cancer by imaging, rectal exam, or direct visualization during sigmoidoscopy. It was a long-held belief that most patients who did not undergo surgery for personal or medical reasons would experience a local and/or systemic recurrence. However, it became clear that patients with a pathologic complete response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy followed by definitive surgery had a better DFS than did patients who did not have a pathologic clinical response.[]

Several single-institution studies have challenged this standard of care by demonstrating that most patients with complete clinical response will be cured of rectal cancer without surgery and that many patients who experience a local recurrence can be treated with surgical resection (abdominoperineal resection or laparoscopic-assisted resection) at the time of their recurrence.[] These institutional series were hampered by their small size and inherent selection bias.

Evidence (primary chemoradiation therapy followed by intensive surveillance for complete clinical responders)

Investigators in England performed the Oncological Outcomes after Clinical Complete Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer trial.[] This was a propensity-score−matched cohort analysis. At a tertiary medical center in Manchester, 228 patients who chose watchful waiting from 2011 to 2013 after a complete clinical response to preoperative chemoradiation therapy were combined with 98 patients from a registry of three neighboring medical centers who chose watchful waiting after chemoradiation therapy beginning in 2005. A clinical complete response was considered in the absence of residual ulceration, stenosis, or mass within the rectum during digital rectal examination and endoscopic examination 8 weeks or more after completion of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. The only positive findings consistent with a complete clinical response during clinical or endoscopic examination were whitening of the mucosa and telangiectasia. Classification of complete clinical response required normal radiologic imaging of the mesorectum and pelvis. Complete clinical responders (n = 129) were compared with a cohort of patients treated similarly who underwent surgery for complete resection (n = 228). Compared with all patients who underwent surgery, patients who chose watch and wait had tumors with an earlier T stage and N stage and that were less likely to be poorly differentiated.

  • After a median follow-up of 33 months, 44 (34%) of the 129 patients who chose watchful waiting had a local recurrence, and 36 patients had a salvage resection.
  • In the paired-cohort analysis, the 3-year non-regrowth DFS for all patients was 83% (95% CI, 76–88): 88% (95% CI, 75–94) for the watch-and-wait group and 78% (95% CI, 63–87) for the surgical resection group (log-rank, P = .022).
  • The 3-year OS was 96% (95% CI, 88–98) in the watch-and-wait group versus 87% (95% CI, 77–93) for the surgical resection group (log-rank, P = .015).
  • The 3-year colostomy-free survival was 74% (95% CI, 64–82) for the watch-and-wait group and 47% (95% CI, 37–57; log-rank, P < .0001) for the surgical group.
Patients managed by watch and wait underwent a more intensive follow-up protocol consisting of outpatient digital rectal examination; MRI (every 4–6 months in the first 2 years); examination under anesthesia or endoscopy; computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; and at least two carcinoembryonic antigen measurements in the first 2 years. The optimal follow-up has not been determined.
For patients who have a complete clinical response to therapy, it is reasonable to consider a watch-and-wait approach with intensive surveillance instead of immediate surgical resection.

Stage IV and Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment

Treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent rectal cancer depends on the location of the disease.

Metastatic and Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Standard treatment options for stage IV and recurrent rectal cancer include the following:

  • Surgery with or without chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
  • First-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy.
  • Second-line chemotherapy.
  • Palliative therapy.

Surgery with or without chemotherapy or radiation therapy

For patients with locally recurrent, liver-only, or lung-only metastatic disease, surgical resection, if feasible, is the only potentially curative treatment.[] Patients with limited pulmonary metastasis, and patients with both pulmonary and hepatic metastasis, may also be considered for surgical resection, with 5-year survival possible in highly selected patients.[] The presence of hydronephrosis associated with recurrence appears to be a contraindication to surgery with curative intent.[]

Locally recurrent rectal cancer may be resectable, particularly if an inadequate prior operation was performed. For patients with local recurrence alone after an initial, attempted curative resection, aggressive local therapy with repeat low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis, abdominoperineal resection, or posterior or total pelvic exenteration can lead to long-term disease-free survival.[,]

The use of induction chemoradiation therapy for previously nonirradiated patients with locally advanced pelvic recurrence (pelvic side-wall, sacral, and/or adjacent organ involvement) may increase resectability and allow for sphincter preservation.[,] Intraoperative radiation therapy in patients who underwent previous external-beam radiation therapy may improve local control in patients with locally recurrent disease, with acceptable morbidity.[]

First-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy

The following are active U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs that are used alone and in combination with other drugs for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer:

  • Fluorouracil (5-FU).
  • Irinotecan.
  • Oxaliplatin.
  • Capecitabine.
  • Bevacizumab.
  • FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin [LV], and 5-FU).
  • Cetuximab.
  • Aflibercept.
  • Ramucirumab.
  • Panitumumab.
  • Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody versus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody with first-line chemotherapy. .
  • Regorafenib.
  • TAS-102.
  • Pembrolizumab.
5-FU

When 5-FU was the only active chemotherapy drug, trials in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease demonstrated partial responses and prolongation of the time-to-progression (TTP) of disease,[,] and improved survival and quality of life in patients who received chemotherapy versus best supportive care.[] Several trials have analyzed the activity and toxic effects of various 5-FU/LV regimens using different doses and administration schedules and showed essentially equivalent results with a median survival time in the approximately 12-month range.[]

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin

Three randomized studies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer demonstrated improved response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) when irinotecan or oxaliplatin was combined with 5-FU/LV.[]

Evidence (irinotecan vs. oxaliplatin):

  • An intergroup study (NCCTG-N9741 [NCT00003594]) compared irinotecan/5-FU/LV (IFL) with oxaliplatin/LV/5-FU (FOLFOX4) in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.[][]

    • Patients assigned to FOLFOX4 experienced an improved PFS compared with patients randomly assigned to IFL (median, 8.7 months vs. 6.9 months; P = .014; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.89) and OS (19.5 months vs. 15.0 months; P = .001; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54–0.82).

Subsequently, two studies compared FOLFOX with LV/5-FU/irinotecan (FOLFIRI), and patients were allowed to cross over after progression on first-line therapy.[,][]

  • PFS and OS were identical between the treatment arms in both studies.

The Bolus, Infusional, or Capecitabine with Camptosar-Celecoxib (BICC-C [NCT00094965]) trial evaluated several different irinotecan-based regimens in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: FOLFIRI, irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/LV (mIFL), and capecitabine/irinotecan (CAPIRI).[] The study randomly assigned 430 patients and was closed early due to poor accrual.

  • The patients who received FOLFIRI had a better PFS than the patients who received either mIFL (7.6 months vs. 5.9 months; P = .004) or CAPIRI (7.6 months vs. 5.8 months; P = .015).
  • Patients who received CAPIRI had the highest (grade 3 or higher) rates of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, and hand-foot syndrome.

Since the publication of these studies, the use of either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI is considered acceptable for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, when using an irinotecan-based regimen as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, FOLFIRI is preferred.[][]

Capecitabine

Before the advent of multiagent chemotherapy, two randomized studies demonstrated that capecitabine was associated with equivalent efficacy when compared with the Mayo Clinic regimen of 5-FU/LV.[,][]

Randomized phase III trials have addressed the equivalence of substituting capecitabine for infusional 5-FU. Two phase III studies have evaluated capcitabine/oxaliplatin (CAPOX) versus 5-FU/oxaliplatin regimens (FUOX or FUFOX).[,]

Evidence (oxaliplatin vs. capecitabine)

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internische Onkologie (AIO) Colorectal Study Group randomly assigned 474 patients to either CAPOX or FUFOX.

  • The median PFS was 7.1 months for the CAPOX arm and 8.0 months for the FUFOX arm (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96–1.43; P = .117), and the HR was in the prespecified equivalence range.[]

The Spanish Cooperative Group randomly assigned 348 patients to CAPOX or FUOX.[][]

  • The TTP was 8.9 months for CAPOX versus 9.5 months for FUOX (P = .153) and met the prespecified range for noninferiority.

When using an oxaliplatin-based regimen as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, a CAPOX regimen is not inferior to a 5-FU/oxaliplatin regimen.

Bevacizumab

Bevacizumab can reasonably be added to either FOLFIRI or FOLFOX for patients undergoing first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. There are currently no completed randomized controlled studies evaluating whether continued use of bevacizumab in second-line or third-line treatment after progressing on a first-line bevacizumab regimen extends survival.

Evidence (bevacizumab)

After bevacizumab was approved, the BICC-C trial was amended, and an additional 117 patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI/bevacizumab or mIFL/bevacizumab.[]

  • Although the primary endpoint of PFS was not significantly different, patients who received FOLFIRI/bevacizumab had a significantly better OS (28.0 months vs. 19.2 months; P = .037; HR for death, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.12–2.88).

In the Hurwitz study, patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to either IFL or IFL/bevacizumab.[]

  • The patients randomly assigned to IFL/bevacizumab experienced a significantly better PFS (10.6 months with IFL/bevacizumab compared with 6.2 months with IFL/placebo; HR for disease progression, 0.54; P < .001) and OS (20.3 months with IFL/bevacizumab compared with 15.6 months with IFL/placebo; HRdeath, 0.66; P < .001).[]

Despite the lack of direct data, in standard practice bevacizumab was added to FOLFOX as a standard first-line regimen based on the results of NCCTG-N9741.[] Subsequently, in a randomized phase III study, 1,401 patients with untreated, stage IV colorectal cancer were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design to CAPOX versus FOLFOX4, then to bevacizumab versus placebo. PFS was the primary endpoint.[][]

  • The median PFS was 9.4 months for patients who received bevacizumab and 8.0 months for the patients who received placebo (HR, 0.83; 97.5% CI, 0.72–0.95; P = .0023).
  • Median OS was 21.3 months for patients who received bevacizumab and 19.9 months for patients who received placebo (HR, 0.89; 97.5% CI, 0.76–1.03; P = .077).
  • The median PFS (intention-to-treat analysis) was 8.0 months in the pooled CAPOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX4-containing arms (HR, 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93–1.16), with the upper limit of the 97.5% CI being below the predefined noninferiority margin of 1.23.[,]
  • The effect of bevacizumab on OS is likely to be less than what was seen in the original Hurwitz study.

Investigators from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomly assigned patients who had progressed on 5-FU/LV and irinotecan to either FOLFOX or FOLFOX/bevacizumab.

  • Patients randomly assigned to FOLFOX/bevacizumab experienced a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with patients assigned to FOLFOX alone (7.43 months vs. 4.7 months; HR, 0.61; P < .0001) and OS (12.9 months vs. 10.8 months; HR, 0.75; P = .0011).[][]
FOLFOXIRI

Evidence (FOLFOXIRI)

The combination of FOLFOXIRI with bevacizumab was compared with FOLFIRI with bevacizumab in a randomized, phase III study of 508 patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.[]

  • The median PFS was 12.1 months in the FOLFOXIRI group, compared with 9.7 months in the FOLFIRI group (HR for progression, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62–0.90; P = .003). OS was not significantly different between the groups (31.0 vs. 25.8 months; HRdeath, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63–1.00; P = .054).[][]
  • Patients who received FOLFOXIRI had significantly more grade 3 and 4 toxicities, including neutropenia, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy.
Cetuximab

Cetuximab is a partially humanized monoclonal antibody against EGFR. Importantly, patients with mutant KRAS tumors may experience worse outcome when cetuximab is added to multiagent chemotherapy regimens containing bevacizumab.

Evidence (cetuximab)

For patients who have progressed on irinotecan-containing regimens, a randomized, phase II study was performed that used either cetuximab or irinotecan/cetuximab.[][]

  • The median TTP for patients who received cetuximab was 1.5 months, compared with median TTP of 4.2 months for patients who received irinotecan and cetuximab. On the basis of this study, cetuximab was approved for use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-FU and irinotecan.

The Crystal Study (EMR 62202-013 [NCT00154102]) randomly assigned 1,198 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer to FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab.[][]

  • The addition of cetuximab was associated with an improved PFS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72–0.99; P = .048 by a stratified log–rank test) but not OS.
  • Retrospective studies of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have suggested that responses to anti-EGFR antibody therapy are confined to patients with tumors that harbor wild types of KRAS (i.e., lack activating mutations at codon 12 or 13 of the KRAS gene).
  • A subset analysis evaluating efficacy vis-à-vis KRAS status was done in patients enrolled on the Crystal Study. There was a significant interaction for KRAS mutation status and treatment for tumor response (P = .03) but not for PFS (P = .07). Among patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, the HR favored the FOLFIRI/cetuximab group (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50–0.94).

In a randomized trial, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received capecitabine/oxaliplatin/bevacizumab with or without cetuximab.[][]

  • The median PFS was 9.4 months in the group who received cetuximab and 10.7 months in the group who did not receive cetuximab (P = .01).
  • In a subset analysis, cetuximab-treated patients with tumors bearing a mutated KRAS gene had significantly decreased PFS compared with cetuximab-treated patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (8.1 months vs. 10.5 months; P = .04).
  • Cetuximab-treated patients with mutated KRAS tumors had a significantly shorter PFS than patients with mutated KRAS tumors who did not receive cetuximab (8.1 months vs. 12.5 months; P = .003) and a significantly shorter OS (17.2 months vs. 24.9 months; P = .03).

The Medical Research Council (MRC) (UKM-MRC-COIN-CR10 [NCT00182715] or COIN trial) sought to answer the question of whether adding cetuximab to combination chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin in first-line treatment for patients with KRAS wild-type tumors was beneficial.[,] In addition, the MRC sought to evaluate the effect of intermittent chemotherapy versus continuous chemotherapy. The 1,630 patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups:

  • Arm A: fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin.
  • Arm B: fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin/cetuximab.
  • Arm C: intermittent fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin.

The comparisons between arms A and B and arms A and C were analyzed and published separately.[,]

  • In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors (arm A, n = 367; arm B, n = 362), OS did not differ between treatment groups (median survival, 17.9 months [interquartile range (IQR), 10.3–29.2] in the control group vs. 17.0 months [IQR, 9.4–30.1] in the cetuximab group; HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87–1.23; P = .67). Similarly, there was no effect on PFS (8.6 months [IQR, 5.0–12.5] in the control group vs. 8.6 months [IQR, 5.1–13.8] in the cetuximab group; HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.82–1.12, = .60).[,][]
  • The reasons for lack of benefit in adding cetuximab are unclear. Subset analyses suggest that the use of capecitabine was associated with an inferior outcome, and the use of second-line therapy was less in patients treated with cetuximab.

There was no difference between the continuously treated patients (arm A) and the intermittently treated patients (arm C).

  • Median survival in the intent-to-treat population (n = 815 in both groups) was 15.8 months (IQR, 9.4–26.1) in arm A and 14.4 months (IQR, 8.0–24.7) in arm C (HR, 1.084; 80% CI, 1.008–1.165).
  • In the per-protocol population, which included only those patients who were free from progression at 12 weeks and randomly assigned to continue treatment or go on a chemotherapy holiday (arm A, n = 467; arm C, n = 511), median survival was 19.6 months (IQR, 13.0–28.1) in arm A and 18.0 months (IQR, 12.1–29.3) in arm C (HR, 1.087, 95% CI, 0.986–1.198).
  • The upper limits of CIs for HRs in both analyses were greater than the predefined noninferiority boundary. While intermittent chemotherapy was not deemed noninferior, there appeared to be clinically insignificant differences in patient outcomes.
    Aflibercept

    Aflibercept is a novel anti-VEGF molecule and has been evaluated as a component of second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

    Evidence (aflibercept):

    In one trial, 1,226 patients were randomly assigned to receive aflibercept (4 mg/kg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI.[][]

    • Patients who received aflibercept plus FOLFIRI had significantly improved OS rates, with median survival times of 13.50 months compared with patients who received placebo plus FOLFIRI, with median survival times of 12.06 months (HR, 0.817; 95.34% CI, 0.713–0.937; P = .0032).
    • Patients who received aflibercept plus FOLFIRI also had significantly improved PFS rates, with median PFS rates of 6.90 months compared with patients who received placebo plus FOLFIRI, with median PFS rates of 4.67 months (HR, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.661–0.869; P < .0001).
    • On the basis of these results, the use of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept is an acceptable second-line regimen for patients previously treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy. Whether to continue bevacizumab or initiate aflibercept in second-line therapy has not been addressed as yet in any clinical trial, and there are no data available.
    Ramucirumab

    Ramucirumab is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2).

    Evidence (ramucirumab):

    In the randomized, unblinded, phase III RAISE (NCT01183780) study, 1,072 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who had progressed on first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned to FOLFIRI with or without ramucirumab (8 mg/kg).[][]

    • Patients assigned to FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab had a significant improvement in median OS (13.3 months vs. 11.7 months; HR, 0.84; = .0219) and PFS (5.7 months vs. 4.5 months; HR, 0.793; P = .0005).
    • Grade 3 adverse events were more common in the ramucirumab group, including grade 3 neutropenia.
    • On the basis of this data, FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab is an acceptable second-line regimen for patients previously treated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab. Whether to continue bevacizumab in second-line chemotherapy or use ramucirumab in second-line chemotherapy has not yet been addressed in a clinical trial.
    Panitumumab

    Panitumumab is a fully humanized antibody against the EGFR. The FDA approved panitumumab for use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to chemotherapy.[] In clinical trials, panitumumab demonstrated efficacy as a single agent or in combination therapy, which was consistent with the effects on PFS and OS with cetuximab. There appears to be a consistent class effect.

    Evidence (panitumumab)

    In a phase III trial, patients with chemotherapy-refractory colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to panitumumab or best supportive care.[][]

    • Patients who received panitumumab experienced an improved PFS (8 weeks vs. 7.3 weeks; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44–0.66; P < .0001).
    • There was no difference in OS, which was thought to be the result of 76% of patients on best supportive care crossing over to panitumumab.

    In the Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME [NCT00364013]) study, 1,183 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX4 with or without panitumumab as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. The study was amended to enlarge the sample size to address patients with KRAS wild-type tumors and patients with mutant KRAS tumors separately.[][]

    • For patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, a statistically significant improvement in PFS was observed in those who received panitumumab/FOLFOX4 compared with those who received only FOLFOX4 (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66–0.97; P = .02, stratified log-rank test).
    • Median PFS was 9.6 months (95% CI, 9.2–11.1 months) for patients who received panitumumab/FOLFOX4 and 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.5–9.3 months) for patients who received FOLFOX4. OS was not significantly different between the groups (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67–1.02; P = .072).

    For patients with mutant KRAS tumors, PFS was worse with the addition of panitumumab (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04–1.62; P = .02, stratified log–rank test).

    • Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 6.3–8.0 months) for panitumumab/FOLFOX4 and 8.8 months (95% CI, 7.7–9.4 months) for FOLFOX4 alone.

    Subsequently, a retrospective analysis evaluated patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 wild-type status for other KRAS and BRAF mutations.[]

    • Of the 620 patients who were initially identified as not having a mutation in exon 2 of KRAS, 108 patients (17%) were found to have additional RAS mutations and 53 patients (8%) were found to have BRAF mutations. In a retrospective analysis, patients without any RAS or BRAF mutations had a longer PFS (10.8 months vs. 9.2 months, P = .002) and OS (28.3 months vs. 20.9 months, P = .02) when assigned to the FOLFOX4/panitumumab arm than the patients assigned to the FOLFOX4 arm.
    1. Similarly, the addition of panitumumab to a regimen of FOLFOX/bevacizumab resulted in a worse PFS and worse toxicity compared with a regimen of FOLFOX/bevacizumab alone in patients not selected for KRAS mutation in metastatic rectal cancer (11.4 months vs. 10.0 months; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06–1.52).[][]
    2. In another study (NCT00339183), patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had already received a fluoropyrimidine regimen were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI/panitumumab.[][]

      1. In a post hoc analysis, patients with KRAS wild-type tumors experienced a statistically significant PFS advantage (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59–0.90; P = .004, stratified log-rank).

        • Median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.5–6.7 months) for FOLFIRI/panitumumab and 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.3 months) for FOLFIRI alone.
      2. OS was not significantly different. Median OS was 14.5 months for the FOLFIRI/panitumumab group versus 12.5 months for the FOLFIRI alone group.
      3. Patients with mutant KRAS tumors experienced no benefit from the addition of panitumumab.
    Anti-EGFR antibody versus anti-VEGF antibody with first-line chemotherapy

    In the management of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer, it is unknown whether patients with KRAS wild-type cancer should receive an anti-EGFR antibody with chemotherapy or an anti-VEGF antibody with chemotherapy. Two studies attempted to answer this question.[,]

    Evidence (anti-EGFR antibody vs. anti-VEGF antibody with first-line chemotherapy)

    The FIRE-3 (NCT00433927) study randomly assigned 592 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors who were previously untreated to FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (297 patients) or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (295 patients). The primary endpoint of the study was objective response rate.[][]

    • The objective response rate was not significantly different between the groups (objective response rate, 62.0%; 95% CI, 56.2–67.5 vs. objective response rate, 58.0%; 95% CI, 52.1–63.7; odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.85–1.64; P = .18).
    • Median PFS was 10.0 months (95% CI, 8.8–10.8) in the cetuximab group and 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.8–11.3) in the bevacizumab group (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.88–1.26; P = .55).
    • Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.0–36.6) in the cetuximab group compared with 25.0 months (range, 22.7–27.6 months) in the bevacizumab group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62–0.96; P = .017).
    • In a post hoc analysis of patients with expanded RAS wild-type tumors (sequencing for mutational hot spots within KRAS and NRAS genes, including exon 2 codons 12 and 13; exon 3 codons 59 and 61; and exon 4 codons 117 and 146), the median OS was 33.1 months (95% CI, 24.5–39.4) in the cetuximab group compared with 25.0 months (95% CI, 23.0–28.1) in the bevacizumab group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54–0.90; P = .0059).[]
    • Of note, only 52% of patients assigned to the bevacizumab arm subsequently received cetuximab or panitumumab.[]

    The Cancer and Leukemia Group B Intergroup study 80405 (NCT00265850) was presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in 2014. This study randomly assigned 2,334 previously untreated patients with KRAS wild-type cancer to chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab or chemotherapy plus cetuximab. OS was the primary endpoint.[][]

    • There was no statistically significant difference in OS among the patients assigned to bevacizumab or cetuximab (for OS differences, chemotherapy/bevacizumab = 29.04 months [range, 25.66–31.21 months] vs. chemotherapy/cetuximab = 29.93 months [range, 27.56–31.21 months]; HR, 0.92 [0.78, 1.09]; P = .34).

    On the basis of these two studies, no apparent significant difference is evident about starting treatment with chemotherapy/bevacizumab or chemotherapy/cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. However, in patients with KRAS wild-type cancer, administration of an anti-EGFR antibody at some point in the course of management improves OS.

    Regorafenib

    Regorafenib is an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinase pathways including VEGF. In September 2012, the FDA granted approval for the use of regorafenib in patients who had progressed on previous therapy.

    Evidence (regorafenib):

    The safety and effectiveness of regorafenib were evaluated in a single, clinical study of 760 patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 fashion to receive regorafenib or a placebo in addition to the best supportive care.[,]

    • Patients treated with regorafenib had a statistically significant improvement in OS (6.4 months in the regorafenib group vs. 5.0 months in the placebo group; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64–0.94; one-sided P = .0052).
    TAS-102

    TAS-102 (Lonsurf) is an orally administered combination of a thymidine-based nucleic acid analog, trifluridine, and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, tipiracil hydrochloride. Trifluridine, in its triphosphate form, inhibits thymidylate synthase; therefore, trifluridine, in this form, has an anti-tumor effect. Tipiracil hydrochloride is a potent inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase, which actively degrades trifluridine. The combination of trifluridine and tipiracil allows for adequate plasma levels of trifluridine.

    Evidence (TAS-102)
    A phase III, double-blind study (RECOURSE [NCT01607957]) randomly assigned 800 stage IV colorectal cancer patients whose cancer had been refractory to two previous therapies. Patients were required to have received 5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab and, if the patients had KRAS wild-type cancer, cetuximab or panitumumab. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive best supportive care plus TAS-102 (n = 534) or placebo (n = 266). The median age of patients was 63 years, and the majority of patients (60%–63%) had received four or more previous lines of therapy. All patients had formerly received fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab, and 52% of them had received an EGFR inhibitor. Approximately 20% of the patients had received previous treatment with regorafenib.[][]

    • TAS-102 was administered at 35 mg/m2 twice daily with meals for 5 days, with 2 days of rest for 2 weeks, followed by a 14-day rest period.
    • The primary endpoint of the study was OS. The median OS for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received TAS-102 was 7.1 months compared with 5.3 months for those who received a placebo (HR, 0.68; P < .0001).
    • The median PFS time in the TAS-102 arm was 2 months versus 1.7 months with a placebo (HR, 0.48; P < .0001).
    • Secondary endpoints focused on PFS, overall response rate, and disease control rate.
    • The overall response rate was 1.6% with TAS-102, which consisted of a complete response in one patient and partial responses in other patients. The overall response rate with a placebo was 0.4% (P = .29).

    TAS-102 was approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patientsbased on the results of the RECOURSE trial.

    Pembrolizumab

    Approximately 4% of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer will have tumors that are microsatellite unstable; this designation is also known as microsatellite-high (MSI-H). The MSI-H phenotype is associated with germline defects in the MLH1MSH2MSH6, or PMS2 genes, and is the primary phenotype observed in tumors from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) or Lynch syndrome. Patients can also have the MSI-H phenotype because one of these genes was silenced via a process called DNA methylation. Testing for microsatellite instability can be done with molecular genetic tests, which look for microsatellite instability in the tumor tissue or with immunohistochemistry, which looks for the loss of mismatch repair proteins.

    In May 2017, the FDA granted approval for using pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, in patients with microsatellite unstable tumors.

    The approval was based on data from 149 patients with MSI-H or DNA mismatch repair cancers enrolled across 5 uncontrolled, multicohort, multicenter, single-arm clinical trials. Ninety patients had colorectal cancer, and 59 patients were diagnosed with one of 14 other cancer types. Patients received either 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg of pembrolizumab every 2 weeks. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The major efficacy outcome measures were objective response rate, which was assessed by blinded independent central radiologists’ review in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and response duration.

    • Objective response rate was 39.6% (95% CI: 31.7, 47.9).
    • Responses lasted 6 months or longer for 78% percent of those who responded to pembrolizumab. There were 11 complete responses and 48 partial responses.
    • Objective response rate was similar whether patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (36%) or a different cancer type (46% across the 14 other cancer types).
    Second-line chemotherapy

    Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan in patients treated with 5-FU/LV as first-line therapy demonstrated improved OS when compared with either infusional 5-FU or supportive care.[]

    Similarly, a phase III trial randomly assigned patients who progressed on irinotecan and 5-FU/LV to bolus and infusional 5-FU/LV, single-agent oxaliplatin, or FOLFOX4. The median TTP for FOLFOX4 versus 5-FU/LV was 4.6 months versus 2.7 months (stratified log-rank test, 2-sided P < .001).[][]

    Palliative therapy

    Palliative radiation therapy,[,] chemotherapy,[,] and chemoradiation therapy [,] may be indicated. Palliative, endoscopically-placed stents may be used to relieve obstruction.[]

    Treatment of Liver Metastasis

    Approximately 15% to 25% of colorectal cancer patients will present with liver metastases at diagnosis, and another 25% to 50% will develop metachronous hepatic metastasis after resection of the primary tumor.[] Although only a small proportion of patients with liver metastasis are candidates for surgical resection, advances in tumor ablation techniques and in both regional and systemic chemotherapy administration provide a number of treatment options. These include the following:

    • Surgery.
    • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    • Local ablation.
    • Adjuvant chemotherapy.
    • Intra-arterial chemotherapy after liver resection.

    Surgery

    Hepatic metastasis may be considered to be resectable based on the following factors:[,]

    • Limited number of lesions.
    • Intrahepatic locations of lesions.
    • Lack of major vascular involvement.
    • Absent or limited extrahepatic disease.
    • Sufficient functional hepatic reserve.

    For patients with hepatic metastasis that is considered to be resectable, a negative margin resection has been associated with 5-year survival rates of 25% to 40% in mostly nonrandomized studies, such as the North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial NCCTG-934653 (NCT00002575).[][] Improved surgical techniques and advances in preoperative imaging have improved patient selection for resection. In addition, multiple studies with multiagent chemotherapy have demonstrated that patients with metastatic disease isolated to the liver, which historically would be considered unresectable, can occasionally be made resectable after the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.[]

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Patients with hepatic metastases that are deemed unresectable will occasionally become candidates for resection if they have a good response to chemotherapy. These patients have 5-year survival rates similar to patients who initially had resectable disease.[]

    Local ablation

    Radiofrequency ablation has emerged as a safe technique (2% major morbidity and <1% mortality rate) that may provide long-term tumor control.[] Radiofrequency ablation and cryosurgical ablation remain options for patients with tumors that cannot be resected and for patients who are not candidates for liver resection.

    Adjuvant chemotherapy

    The role of adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of liver metastases is uncertain.

    Evidence (adjuvant chemotherapy)

    A trial of hepatic arterial floxuridine and dexamethasone plus systemic 5-FU/LV compared with systemic 5-FU/LV alone showed improved 2-year PFS (57% vs. 42%; P =.07) and OS (86% vs. 72%; P = .03) for patients in the combined therapy arm but did not show a significant statistical difference in median survival when compared with systemic 5-FU therapy alone.[][]

    • Median survival in the combined therapy arm was 72.2 months versus 59.3 months in the monotherapy arm (P = .21).

    A second trial preoperatively randomly assigned patients with one to three potentially resectable colorectal hepatic metastases to either no further therapy or postoperative hepatic arterial floxuridine plus systemic 5-FU.[] Among those randomly assigned patients, 27% were deemed ineligible at the time of surgery, leaving only 75 patients evaluable for recurrence and survival.

    • While liver recurrence was decreased, median or 4-year survival was not significantly different between the patient groups.

      Additional studies are required to evaluate this treatment approach and to determine whether more effective systemic combination chemotherapy alone would provide results similar to hepatic intra-arterial therapy plus systemic treatment.

      Intra-arterial chemotherapy after liver resection

      Hepatic intra-arterial chemotherapy with floxuridine for liver metastases has produced higher overall response rates but no consistent improvement in survival when compared with systemic chemotherapy.[,] Controversy regarding the efficacy of regional chemotherapy was the basis of a large multicenter phase III trial (Leuk-9481) (NCT00002716) of hepatic arterial infusion versus systemic chemotherapy. The use of combination intra-arterial chemotherapy with hepatic radiation therapy, especially employing focal radiation of metastatic lesions, is under evaluation.[]

      Increased local toxic effects after hepatic infusional therapy are seen, including liver function abnormalities and fatal biliary sclerosis.

      Drugs Approved for Colon and Rectum Cancer

      • Avastin (Bevacizumab)
      • Bevacizumab
      • Camptosar (Irinotecan Hydrochloride)
      • Capecitabine
      • Cetuximab
      • Cyramza (Ramucirumab)
      • Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin)
      • Erbitux (Cetuximab)
      • 5-FU (Fluorouracil Injection)
      • Fluorouracil Injection
      • Ipilimumab
      • Irinotecan Hydrochloride
      • Keytruda (Pembrolizumab)
      • Leucovorin Calcium
      • Lonsurf (Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride)
      • Mvasi (Bevacizumab)
      • Nivolumab
      • Opdivo (Nivolumab)
      • Oxaliplatin
      • Panitumumab
      • Pembrolizumab
      • Ramucirumab
      • Regorafenib
      • Stivarga (Regorafenib)
      • Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
      • Vectibix (Panitumumab)
      • Xeloda (Capecitabine)
      • Yervoy (Ipilimumab)
      • Zaltrap (Ziv-Aflibercept)
      • Ziv-Aflibercept

      Drug Combinations Used in Colon Cancer

      • CAPOX
      • FOLFIRI
      • FOLFIRI-BEVACIZUMAB
      • FOLFIRI-CETUXIMAB
      • FOLFOX
      • FU-LV
      • XELIRI
      • XELOX

      Drugs Approved for Rectal Cancer

      • Avastin (Bevacizumab)
      • Bevacizumab
      • Camptosar (Irinotecan Hydrochloride)
      • Capecitabine
      • Cetuximab
      • Cyramza (Ramucirumab)
      • Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin)
      • Erbitux (Cetuximab)
      • 5-FU (Fluorouracil Injection)
      • Fluorouracil Injection
      • Ipilimumab
      • Irinotecan Hydrochloride
      • Keytruda (Pembrolizumab)
      • Leucovorin Calcium
      • Lonsurf (Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride)
      • Mvasi (Bevacizumab)
      • Nivolumab
      • Opdivo (Nivolumab)
      • Oxaliplatin
      • Panitumumab
      • Pembrolizumab
      • Ramucirumab
      • Regorafenib
      • Stivarga (Regorafenib)
      • Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
      • Vectibix (Panitumumab)
      • Xeloda (Capecitabine)
      • Yervoy (Ipilimumab)
      • Zaltrap (Ziv-Aflibercept)
      • Ziv-Aflibercept

      Drug Combinations Used in Rectal Cancer

      • CAPOX
      • FOLFIRI
      • FOLFIRI-BEVACIZUMAB
      • FOLFIRI-CETUXIMAB
      • FOLFOX
      • FU-LV
      • XELIRI
      • XELOX

      Drugs Approved for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

      • Afinitor (Everolimus)
      • Everolimus
      • Lanreotide Acetate
      • Somatuline Depot (Lanreotide Acetate)

      To Learn More About Rectal Cancer

      For more information from the National Cancer Institute about rectal cancer, see the following:

      • Colorectal Cancer Home Page
      • Colorectal Cancer Prevention
      • Colorectal Cancer Screening
      • Tests to Detect Colorectal Cancer and Polyps
      • Childhood Colorectal Cancer Treatment
      • Cryosurgery in Cancer Treatment
      • Drugs Approved for Colon and Rectal Cancer
      • Targeted Cancer Therapies
      • Genetic Testing for Inherited Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes

      For general cancer information and other resources from the National Cancer Institute, see the following:

      • About Cancer
      • Staging
      • Chemotherapy and You: Support for People With Cancer
      • Radiation Therapy and You: Support for People With Cancer
      • Coping with Cancer
      • Questions to Ask Your Doctor about Cancer
      • For Survivors and Caregivers

      References

      ByRx Harun

      Rectal Cancer – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment

      Rectal Cancer are the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States and the second deadliest. Rectal cancer has distinct environmental associations and genetic risk factors different from colon cancer.  The transformation of the normal rectal epithelium to a dysplastic lesion and eventually an invasive carcinoma requires a combination of genetic mutations either somatic (acquired) or germline (inherited) over an approximately 10 to 15 year period. Response to pre-operative therapy and pathological staging are the most important prognostic indicators of rectal cancer.

      Types of Rectal Cancer

      Other, much less common types of tumors can start in the colon and rectum, too. These include:

      • Carcinoid tumors – These start from special hormone-making cells in the intestine. They’re covered in Gastrointestinal Carcinoid Tumors.
      • Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) – start from special cells in the wall of the colon called the interstitial cells of Cajal. Some are not cancer (benign). These tumors can be found anywhere in the digestive tract, but are not common in the colon. They’re discussed in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST).
      • Lymphomas – are cancers of immune system cells. They mostly start in lymph nodes, but they can also start in the colon, rectum, or other organs. Information on lymphomas of the digestive system can be found in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
      • Sarcomas – can start in blood vessels, muscle layers, or other connective tissues in the wall of the colon and rectum. Sarcomas of the colon or rectum are rare. They’re discussed in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

      There are three ways that cancer spreads in the body.

      Cancer can spread through tissue, the lymph system, and the blood:

      • Tissue – Cancer spreads from where it began by growing into nearby areas.
      • Lymph system -Cancer spreads from where it began by getting into the lymph system. Cancer travels through the lymph vessels to other parts of the body.
      • Blood – Cancer spreads from where it began by getting into the blood. Cancer travels through the blood vessels to other parts of the body.

      Cancer may spread from where it began to other parts of the body.

      When cancer spreads to another part of the body, it is called metastasis. Cancer cells break away from where they began (the primary tumor) and travel through the lymph system or blood.

      • Lymph system – cancer gets into the lymph system, travels through the lymph vessels, and forms a tumor (metastatic tumor) in another part of the body.
      • Blood – Cancer gets into the blood, travels through the blood vessels, and forms a tumor (metastatic tumor) in another part of the body.

      The metastatic tumor is the same type of cancer as the primary tumor. For example, if rectal cancer spreads to the lung, the cancer cells in the lung are actually rectal cancer cells. The disease is metastatic rectal cancer, not lung cancer.

      Metastasis: how cancer spreads

      • Many cancer deaths are caused when cancer moves from the original tumor and spreads to other tissues and organs. This is called metastatic cancer. This animation shows how cancer cells travel from the place in the body where they first formed to other parts of the body.

      Causes of Rectal Cancer

      Rectal cancer occurs when healthy cells in the rectum develop errors in their DNA. In most cases, the cause of these errors is unknown.

      • Healthy cells grow and divide in an orderly way to keep your body functioning normally. But when a cell’s DNA is damaged and becomes cancerous, cells continue to divide — even when new cells aren’t needed. As the cells accumulate, they form a tumor.
      • With time, the cancer cells can grow to invade and destroy normal tissue nearby. And cancerous cells can travel to other parts of the body.

      Inherited gene mutations that increase the risk of colon and rectal cancer

      In some families, gene mutations passed from parents to children increase the risk of colorectal cancer. These mutations are involved in only a small percentage of rectal cancers. Some genes linked to rectal cancer increase an individual’s risk of developing the disease, but they don’t make it inevitable.

      Two well-defined genetic colorectal cancer syndromes are

      • Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) – HNPCC, also called Lynch syndrome, increases the risk of colon cancer and other cancers. People with HNPCC tend to develop colon cancer before age 50.
      • Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) – FAP is a rare disorder that causes you to develop thousands of polyps in the lining of your colon and rectum. People with untreated FAP have a greatly increased risk of developing colon or rectal cancer before age 40.

      FAP, HNPCC and other, rarer inherited colorectal cancer syndromes can be detected through genetic testing. If you’re concerned about your family’s history of colon cancer, talk to your doctor about whether your family history suggests you have a risk of these conditions.

      Risk factors

      The characteristics and lifestyle factors that increase your risk of rectal cancer are the same as those that increase your risk of colon cancer. They include:

      • Older age – The great majority of people diagnosed with colon and rectal cancer are older than 50. Colorectal cancer can occur in younger people, but it occurs much less frequently.
      • African-American descent – People of African ancestry born in the United States have a greater risk of colorectal cancer than do people of European ancestry.
      • A personal history of colorectal cancer or polyps – If you’ve already had rectal cancer, colon cancer or adenomatous polyps, you have a greater risk of colorectal cancer in the future.
      • Inflammatory bowel disease – Chronic inflammatory diseases of the colon and rectum, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, increase your risk of colorectal cancer.
      • Inherited syndromes that increase colorectal cancer risk – Genetic syndromes passed through generations of your family can increase your risk of colorectal cancer. These syndromes include FAP and HNPCC.
      • Family history of colorectal cancer – You’re more likely to develop colorectal cancer if you have a parent, sibling or child with the disease. If more than one family member has colon cancer or rectal cancer, your risk is even greater.
      • Dietary factors – Colorectal cancer may be associated with a diet low in vegetables and high in red meat, particularly when the meat is charred or well-done.
      • A sedentary lifestyle – If you’re inactive, you’re more likely to develop colorectal cancer. Getting regular physical activity may reduce your risk of colon cancer.
      • Diabetes – People with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance may have an increased risk of colorectal cancer.
      • Obesity – People who are obese have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and an increased risk of dying of colon or rectal cancer when compared with people considered normal weight.
      • Smoking – People who smoke may have an increased risk of colon cancer.
      • Alcohol – Regularly drinking more than three alcoholic beverages a week may increase your risk of colorectal cancer.
      • Radiation therapy for previous cancer – Radiation therapy directed at the abdomen to treat previous cancers may increase the risk of colorectal cancer.

      Symptoms of Rectal Cancer

      Common symptoms include:

      • Blood (either bright red or very dark) in the stool.
      • A change in bowel habits.
      • Diarrhea.
      • Constipation.
      • Feeling that the bowel does not empty completely.
      • Stools that are narrower or have a different shape than usual.
      • General abdominal discomfort (frequent gas pains, bloating, fullness, or cramps).
      • Change in appetite.
      • Weight loss for no known reason.
      • Feeling very tired.
      • A change in your bowel habits, such as diarrhea, constipation or more frequent bowel movements
      • Dark or red blood in the stool
      • Mucus in stool
      • Narrow stool
      • Abdominal pain
      • Painful bowel movements
      • Iron deficiency anemia
      • A feeling that your bowel doesn’t empty completely
      • Unexplained weight loss
      • Weakness or fatigue
      • Blood in the stool
      • Diarrhea and/or constipation
      • Bloating
      • A feeling that you are unable to empty your bowels

      If cancer metastasizes or spreads to other parts of the body, symptoms may vary depending on where in the body the cancer is located. Symptoms of metastatic rectal cancer may include:

      • Persistent cough
      • Fatigue
      • Bone pain
      • Shortness of breath
      • Loss of appetite
      • Jaundice
      • Swelling in the hands and feet
      • Changes in vision or speech

      Diagnosis of Rectal Cancer

      Anything that increases your chance of getting a disease is called a risk factor. Having a risk factor does not mean that you will get cancer; not having risk factors doesn’t mean that you will not get cancer. Talk to your doctor if you think you may be at risk for colorectal cancer.

      • Having a family history of colon or rectal cancer in a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or child).
      • Having a personal history of cancer of the colon, rectum, or ovary.
      • Having a personal history of high-risk adenomas (colorectal polyps that are 1 centimeter or larger in size or that have cells that look abnormal under a microscope).
      • Having inherited changes in certain genes that increase the risk of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).
      • Having a personal history of chronic ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease for 8 years or more.
      • Having three or more alcoholic drinks per day.
      • Smoking cigarettes.
      • Being black.
      • Being obese.

      Older age is a main risk factor for most cancers. The chance of getting cancer increases as you get older.

      Tests that examine the rectum and colon are used to detect (find) and diagnose rectal cancer.

      Tests used to diagnose rectal cancer include the following:

      • Physical exam and history – An exam of the body to check general signs of health, including checking for signs of disease, such as lumps or anything else that seems unusual. A history of the patient’s health habits and past illnesses and treatments will also be taken.
      • Digital rectal exam (DRE) – An exam of the rectum. The doctor or nurse inserts a lubricated, gloved finger into the lower part of the rectum to feel for lumps or anything else that seems unusual. In women, the vagina may also be examined.
      • Colonoscopy – A procedure to look inside the rectum and colon for polyps (small pieces of bulging tissue), abnormal areas, or cancer. A colonoscope is a thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing. It may also have a tool to remove polyps or tissue samples, which are checked under a microscope for signs of cancer.
      • Biopsy – The removal of cells or tissues so they can be viewed under a microscope to check for signs of cancer. Tumor tissue that is removed during the biopsy may be checked to see if the patient is likely to have the gene mutation that causes HNPCC. This may help to plan treatment. The following tests may be used:
      • Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) test – A laboratory test in which the amount of a genetic substance called mRNA made by a specific gene is measured. An enzyme called reverse transcriptase is used to convert a specific piece of RNA into a matching piece of DNA, which can be amplified (made in large numbers) by another enzyme called DNA polymerase. The amplified DNA copies help tell whether a specific mRNA is being made by a gene. RT–PCR can be used to check the activation of certain genes that may indicate the presence of cancer cells. This test may be used to look for certain changes in a gene or chromosome, which may help diagnose cancer.
      • Immunohistochemistry – A laboratory test that uses antibodies to check for certain antigens (markers) in a sample of a patient’s tissue. The antibodies are usually linked to an enzyme or a fluorescent dye. After the antibodies bind to a specific antigen in the tissue sample, the enzyme or dye is activated, and the antigen can then be seen under a microscope. This type of test is used to help diagnose cancer and to help tell one type of cancer from another type of cancer.
      • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay – A test that measures the level of CEA in the blood. CEA is released into the bloodstream from both cancer cells and normal cells. When found in higher than normal amounts, it can be a sign of rectal cancer or other conditions.
      • Anorectal manometry – measures and assesses the anal sphincter (internal and external) and rectal pressure and its function. This method is used to evaluate patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. It can directly measure the luminal pressure, including the high-pressure zone, resting pressure, squeezing pressure, rectal sensation/compliance, and the anorectal inhibitory reflex.
      • Defecating proctography/Defecography – A study using X-ray imaging to evaluate anatomic defects of the anorectal region and function of the puborectalis muscle. A contrast filled paste gets initially introduced to the rectum, and the patient is instructed to defecate in a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, tensing of the abdomen, and evacuation).
      • Balloon capacity and compliance test – Evaluates the function of the rectum using a device (plastic catheter with a latex balloon attached), which is inserted into the rectum and gradually filled with warm water. During this process, the volume and pressure are measured.
      • Balloon evacuation study – This test is similar to the balloon capacity and compliance test in which a catheter with a small balloon gets inserted into the rectum and filled with water. Different volumes of water get loaded inside the balloon, and the patient is instructed to evacuate the balloon. This procedure is done to evaluate the opening of the anal canal and to assess the relaxation of the pelvic floor.
      • Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency – A probe designed to stimulate and record nerve activity is placed on the physician’s gloved finger, which is then inserted into the rectum to measure pudendal nerve activity (latency to contraction of the anal sphincter muscle). The pudendal nerve innervates the anal sphincter muscles; therefore, this test can be used to assess any injury to that nerve.
      • Electromyography – A test to measure the ability of the puborectalis muscle and sphincter muscles to relax properly. An electrode is placed inside the rectum, and the activity of these muscles gets evaluated throughout a series of stages (relaxation, contraction, and evacuation).
      • Endoanal Ultrasonography – The use of ultrasound imaging to examine rectal lesions, defects, or injuries to the surrounding tissues.
      • Suction rectal biopsy – Gold standard for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. A biopsy is taken two cm above the dentate line, and the absence of ganglion cells on histology confirms the diagnosis. Hypertrophic nerve fibers may be present in addition to this finding.
      • Contrast enema – Used as one of the diagnostic methods for Hirschsprung disease. Useful for localization of the aganglionic segment by looking for a narrowed rectum. Diagnostic confirmation is via a rectal biopsy.

      Certain factors affect prognosis (chance of recovery) and treatment options.

      The prognosis (chance of recovery) and treatment options depend on the following:

      • The stage of the cancer (whether it affects the inner lining of the rectum only, involves the whole rectum, or has spread to lymph nodes, nearby organs, or other places in the body).
      • Whether the tumor has spread into or through the bowel wall.
      • Where the cancer is found in the rectum.
      • Whether the bowel is blocked or has a hole in it.
      • Whether all of the tumor can be removed by surgery.
      • The patient’s general health.
      • Whether the cancer has just been diagnosed or has recurred (come back).

      Stages of Rectal Cancer

      After rectal cancer has been diagnosed, tests are done to find out if cancer cells have spread within the rectum or to other parts of the body.

      The process used to find out whether cancer has spread within the rectum or to other parts of the body is called staging. The information gathered from the staging process determines the stage of the disease. It is important to know the stage in order to plan treatment.

      The following tests and procedures may be used in the staging process:

      • Chest x-ray – An x-ray of the organs and bones inside the chest. An x-ray is a type of energy beam that can go through the body and onto film, making a picture of areas inside the body.
      • Colonoscopy – A procedure to look inside the rectum and colon for polyps (small pieces of bulging tissue). abnormal areas, or cancer. A colonoscope is a thin, tube-like instrument with a light and a lens for viewing. It may also have a tool to remove polyps or tissue samples, which are checked under a microscope for signs of cancer.

      • CT scan (CAT scan) – A procedure that makes a series of detailed pictures of areas inside the body, such as the abdomen, pelvis, or chest, taken from different angles. The pictures are made by a computer linked to an x-ray machine. A dye may be injected into a vein or swallowed to help the organs or tissues show up more clearly. This procedure is also called computed tomography, computerized tomography, or computerized axial tomography.
      • MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) – A procedure that uses a magnet, radio waves, and a computer to make a series of detailed pictures of areas inside the body. This procedure is also called nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI).
      • PET scan (positron emission tomography scan) – A procedure to find malignant tumor cells in the body. A small amount of radioactive glucose (sugar) is injected into a vein. The PET scanner rotates around the body and makes a picture of where glucose is being used in the body. Malignant tumor cells show up brighter in the picture because they are more active and take up more glucose than normal cells do.
      • Endorectal ultrasound – A procedure used to examine the rectum and nearby organs. An ultrasound transducer (probe) is inserted into the rectum and used to bounce high-energy sound waves (ultrasound) off internal tissues or organs and make echoes. The echoes form a picture of body tissues called a sonogram. The doctor can identify tumors by looking at the sonogram. This procedure is also called transrectal ultrasound.

      The following stages are used for rectal cancer:

      Stage 0 (Carcinoma in Situ)

      Stage 0 (rectal carcinoma in situ). Abnormal cells are shown in the mucosa of the rectum wall.

      In stage 0 rectal cancer, abnormal cells are found in the mucosa (innermost layer) of the rectum wall. These abnormal cells may become cancer and spread into nearby normal tissue. Stage 0 is also called carcinoma in situ.

      Stage I

      Stage I rectal cancer. Cancer has spread from the mucosa of the rectum wall to the submucosa or to the muscle layer.
      In stage, I rectal cancer, cancer has formed in the mucosa (innermost layer) of the rectum wall and has spread to the submucosa (layer of tissue next to the mucosa) or to the muscle layer of the rectum wall.

      Stage II

      Stage II rectal cancer. In stage IIA, cancer has spread through the muscle layer of the rectum wall to the serosa. In stage IIB, cancer has spread through the serosa but has not spread to nearby organs. In stage IIC, cancer has spread through the serosa to nearby organs.

      Stage II rectal cancer is divided into stages IIA, IIB, and IIC.

      • Stage IIA: Cancer has spread through the muscle layer of the rectum wall to the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall.
      • Stage IIB: Cancer has spread through the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall to the tissue that lines the organs in the abdomen (visceral peritoneum).
      • Stage IIC: Cancer has spread through the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall to nearby organs.

      Stage III

      Stage III rectal cancer is divided into stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC.

      Stage IIIA rectal cancer. Cancer has spread through the mucosa of the rectum wall to the submucosa and may have spread to the muscle layer, and has spread to one to three nearby lymph nodes or tissues near the lymph nodes. OR, cancer has spread through the mucosa to the submucosa and four to six nearby lymph nodes.

      In stage IIIA, cancer has spread:

      • through the mucosa (innermost layer) of the rectum wall to the submucosa (layer of tissue next to the mucosa) or to the muscle layer of the rectum wall. Cancer has spread to one to three nearby lymph nodes or cancer cells have formed in tissue near the lymph nodes; or
      • through the mucosa (innermost layer) of the rectum wall to the submucosa (layer of tissue next to the mucosa). Cancer has spread to four to six nearby lymph nodes.

      Stage IIIB rectal cancer. Cancer has spread through the muscle layer of the rectum wall to the serosa or has spread through the serosa but not to nearby organs; cancer has spread to one to three nearby lymph nodes or to tissues near the lymph nodes. OR, cancer has spread to the muscle layer or to the serosa, and to four to six nearby lymph nodes. OR, cancer has spread through the mucosa to the submucosa and may have spread to the muscle layer; cancer has spread to seven or more nearby lymph nodes.

      In stage IIIB, cancer has spread:

      • through the muscle layer of the rectum wall to the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall or has spread through the serosa to the tissue that lines the organs in the abdomen (visceral peritoneum). Cancer has spread to one to three nearby lymph nodes or cancer cells have formed in tissue near the lymph nodes; or
      • to the muscle layer or to the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall. Cancer has spread to four to six nearby lymph nodes; or
      • through the mucosa (innermost layer) of the rectum wall to the submucosa (layer of tissue next to the mucosa) or to the muscle layer of the rectum wall. Cancer has spread to seven or more nearby lymph nodes.

      Stage IIIC rectal cancer. Cancer has spread through the serosa of the rectum wall but not to nearby organs; cancer has spread to four to six nearby lymph nodes. OR, cancer has spread through the muscle layer to the serosa or has spread through the serosa but not to nearby organs; cancer has spread to seven or more nearby lymph nodes. OR, cancer has spread through the serosa to nearby organs and to one or more nearby lymph nodes or to tissues near the lymph nodes.

      In stage IIIC, cancer has spread:

      • through the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall to the tissue that lines the organs in the abdomen (visceral peritoneum). Cancer has spread to four to six nearby lymph nodes; or
      • through the muscle layer of the rectum wall to the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall or has spread through the serosa to the tissue that lines the organs in the abdomen (visceral peritoneum). Cancer has spread to seven or more nearby lymph nodes; or
      • through the serosa (outermost layer) of the rectum wall to nearby organs. Cancer has spread to one or more nearby lymph nodes or cancer cells have formed in tissue near the lymph nodes.

      Stage IV

      Stage IV rectal cancer is divided into stages IVA, IVB, and IVC.

      Stage IV rectal cancer. The cancer has spread through the blood and lymph nodes to other parts of the body, such as the lung, liver, abdominal wall, or ovary.

      • Stage IVA – Cancer has spread to one area or organ that is not near the rectum, such as the liver, lung, ovary, or a distant lymph node.
      • Stage IVB – cancer has spread to more than one area or organ that is not near the rectum, such as the liver, lung, ovary, or a distant lymph node.
      • Stage IVC – Cancer has spread to the tissue that lines the wall of the abdomen and may have spread to other areas or organs.

      Treatment of Rectal Cancer

      Six types of standard treatment are used

      Surgery

      Surgery is the most common treatment for all stages of rectal cancer. The cancer is removed using one of the following types of surgery:

      • Polypectomy – If the cancer is found in a polyp (a small piece of bulging tissue), the polyp is often removed during a colonoscopy.
      • Local excision – If the cancer is found on the inside surface of the rectum and has not spread into the wall of the rectum, cancer and a small amount of surrounding healthy tissue is removed.
      • Resection – If cancer has spread into the wall of the rectum, the section of the rectum with cancer and nearby healthy tissue is removed. Sometimes the tissue between the rectum and the abdominal wall is also removed. The lymph nodes near the rectum are removed and checked under a microscope for signs of cancer.
      • Radiofrequency ablation – The use of a special probe with tiny electrodes that kill cancer cells. Sometimes the probe is inserted directly through the skin and only local anesthesia is needed. In other cases, the probe is inserted through an incision in the abdomen. This is done in the hospital with general anesthesia.
      • Cryosurgery – A treatment that uses an instrument to freeze and destroy abnormal tissue. This type of treatment is also called cryotherapy.
      • Pelvic exenteration – If cancer has spread to other organs near the rectum, the lower colon, rectum, and bladder are removed. In women, the cervix, vagina, ovaries, and nearby lymph nodes may be removed. In men, the prostate may be removed. Artificial openings (stoma) are made for urine and stool to flow from the body to a collection bag.

      After the cancer is removed, the surgeon will either

      • do an anastomosis (sew the healthy parts of the rectum together, sew the remaining rectum to the colon, or sew the colon to the anus);

        Resection of the rectum with anastomosis. The rectum and part of the colon are removed, and then the colon and anus are joined.

        or

      • make a stoma (an opening) from the rectum to the outside of the body for waste to pass through. This procedure is done if the cancer is too close to the anus and is called a colostomy. A bag is placed around the stoma to collect the waste. Sometimes the colostomy is needed only until the rectum has healed, and then it can be reversed. If the entire rectum is removed, however, the colostomy may be permanent.
      • Radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy may be given before surgery to shrink the tumor, make it easier to remove cancer, and help with bowel control after surgery. Treatment is given before surgery is called neoadjuvant therapy. After all, cancer that can be seen at the time of the surgery is removed, some patients may be given radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy after surgery to kill any cancer cells that are left. Treatment given after the surgery, to lower the risk that cancer will come back, is called adjuvant therapy.

      Radiation therapy

      Radiation therapy is a cancer treatment that uses high-energy x-rays or other types of radiation to kill cancer cells or keep them from growing. There are two types of radiation therapy:

      • External radiation therapy uses a machine outside the body to send radiation toward the cancer.
      • Internal radiation therapy uses a radioactive substance sealed in needles, seeds, wires, or catheters that are placed directly into or near the cancer.

      The way radiation therapy is given depends on the type and stage of the cancer being treated. External radiation therapy is used to treat rectal cancer.

      Short-course preoperative radiation therapy is used in some types of rectal cancer. This treatment uses fewer and lower doses of radiation than the standard treatment, followed by surgery several days after the last dose.

      Chemotherapy

      Chemotherapy is a cancer treatment that uses drugs to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping the cells from dividing. When chemotherapy is taken by mouth or injected into a vein or muscle, the drugs enter the bloodstream and can reach cancer cells throughout the body (systemic chemotherapy). When chemotherapy is placed directly in the cerebrospinal fluid, an organ, or a body cavity such as the abdomen, the drugs mainly affect cancer cells in those areas (regional chemotherapy).

      Chemoembolization of the hepatic artery is a type of regional chemotherapy that may be used to treat cancer that has spread to the liver. This is done by blocking the hepatic artery (the main artery that supplies blood to the liver) and injecting anticancer drugs between the blockage and the liver. The liver’s arteries then carry the drugs into the liver. Only a small amount of the drug reaches other parts of the body. The blockage may be temporary or permanent, depending on what is used to block the artery. The liver continues to receive some blood from the hepatic portal vein, which carries blood from the stomach and intestine.

      The way the chemotherapy is given depends on the type and stage of the cancer being treated.

      Active surveillance

      Active surveillance is closely following a patient’s condition without giving any treatment unless there are changes in test results. It is used to find early signs that the condition is getting worse. Inactive surveillance, patients are given certain exams and tests to check if the cancer is growing. When cancer begins to grow, treatment is given to cure cancer. Tests include the following:

      • Digital rectal exam.
      • MRI.
      • Endoscopy.
      • Sigmoidoscopy.
      • CT scan.
      • Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay.

      Targeted therapy

      Targeted therapy is a type of treatment that uses drugs or other substances to identify and attack specific cancer cells without harming normal cells.

      Types of targeted therapies used in the treatment of rectal cancer include the following

      • Monoclonal antibodies – Monoclonal antibody therapy is a type of targeted therapy being used for the treatment of rectal cancer. Monoclonal antibody therapy uses antibodies made in the laboratory from a single type of immune system cell. These antibodies can identify substances on cancer cells or normal substances that may help cancer cells grow. The antibodies attach to the substances and kill the cancer cells, block their growth, or keep them from spreading. Monoclonal antibodies are given by infusion. They may be used alone or to carry drugs, toxins, or radioactive material directly to cancer cells.

      There are different types of monoclonal antibody therapy

      • Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor therapy – Cancer cells make a substance called VEGF, which causes new blood vessels to form (angiogenesis) and helps the cancer grow. VEGF inhibitors block VEGF and stop new blood vessels from forming. This may kill cancer cells because they need new blood vessels to grow. Bevacizumab and ramucirumab are VEGF inhibitors and angiogenesis inhibitors.
      • Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy – EGFRs are proteins found on the surface of certain cells, including cancer cells. Epidermal growth factor attaches to the EGFR on the surface of the cell and causes the cells to grow and divide. EGFR inhibitors block the receptor and stop the epidermal growth factor from attaching to the cancer cell. This stops the cancer cell from growing and dividing. Cetuximab and panitumumab are EGFR inhibitors.
      • Angiogenesis inhibitors – Angiogenesis inhibitors stop the growth of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow
      • Ziv-aflibercept – is a vascular endothelial growth factor trap that blocks an enzyme needed for the growth of new blood vessels in tumors.
      • Regorafenib – is used to treat colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body and has not gotten better with other treatment. It blocks the action of certain proteins, including vascular endothelial growth factor. This may help keep cancer cells from growing and may kill them. It may also prevent the growth of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow.

        Immunotherapy

        Immunotherapy is a treatment that uses the patient’s immune system to fight cancer. Substances made by the body or made in a laboratory are used to boost, direct, or restore the body’s natural defenses against cancer. This type of cancer treatment is also called biotherapy or biologic therapy.

        Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is a type of immunotherapy:

        • Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: PD-1 is a protein on the surface of T cells that helps keep the body’s immune responses in check. When PD-1 attaches to another protein called PDL-1 on a cancer cell, it stops the T cell from killing the cancer cell. PD-1 inhibitors attach to PDL-1 and allow the T cells to kill cancer cells. Pembrolizumab is a type of immune checkpoint inhibitor.

        Treatment Options by Stage

        For information about the treatments listed below, see the Treatment Option Overview section.

        Stage 0 (Carcinoma in Situ)

        Treatment of stage 0 may include the following:

        • Simple polypectomy.
        • Local excision.
        • Resection (when the tumor is too large to remove by local excision).

        Use our clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are accepting patients. You can search for trials based on the type of cancer, the age of the patient, and where the trials are being done. General information about clinical trials is also available.

        Stage I Rectal Cancer

        Treatment of stage I rectal cancer may include the following:

        • Local excision.
        • Resection.
        • Resection with radiation therapy and chemotherapy after surgery.

        Use our clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are accepting patients. You can search for trials based on the type of cancer, the age of the patient, and where the trials are being done. General information about clinical trials is also available.

        Stages II and III Rectal Cancer

        Treatment of stage II and stage III rectal cancer may include the following:

        • Surgery.
        • Chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy, followed by surgery.
        • Short-course radiation therapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy.
        • Resection followed by chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy.
        • Chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy, followed by active surveillance. Surgery may be done if the cancer recurs (comes back).
        • A clinical trial of a new treatment.

        Use our clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are accepting patients. You can search for trials based on the type of cancer, the age of the patient, and where the trials are being done. General information about clinical trials is also available.

        Stage IV and Recurrent Rectal Cancer

        Treatment of stage IV and recurrent rectal cancer may include the following:

        • Surgery with or without chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
        • Systemic chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy (angiogenesis inhibitor).
        • Systemic chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy).
        • Chemotherapy to control the growth of the tumor.
        • Radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both, as palliative therapy to relieve symptoms and improve the quality of life.
        • Placement of a stent to help keep the rectum open if it is partly blocked by the tumor, as palliative therapy to relieve symptoms and improve the quality of life.
        • Immunotherapy.
        • Clinical trials of chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy.

        Treatment of rectal cancer that has spread to other organs depends on where the cancer has spread.

        • Treatment for areas of cancer that have spread to the liver includes the following:
        • Surgery to remove the tumor. Chemotherapy may be given before surgery, to shrink the tumor.
        • Cryosurgery or radiofrequency ablation.
        • Chemoembolization and/or systemic chemotherapy.
        • A clinical trial of chemoembolization combined with radiation therapy to the tumors in the liver.

        Drugs Approved for Colon and Rectum Cancer

        • Avastin (Bevacizumab)
        • Bevacizumab
        • Camptosar (Irinotecan Hydrochloride)
        • Capecitabine
        • Cetuximab
        • Cyramza (Ramucirumab)
        • Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin)
        • Erbitux (Cetuximab)
        • 5-FU (Fluorouracil Injection)
        • Fluorouracil Injection
        • Ipilimumab
        • Irinotecan Hydrochloride
        • Keytruda (Pembrolizumab)
        • Leucovorin Calcium
        • Lonsurf (Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride)
        • Mvasi (Bevacizumab)
        • Nivolumab
        • Opdivo (Nivolumab)
        • Oxaliplatin
        • Panitumumab
        • Pembrolizumab
        • Ramucirumab
        • Regorafenib
        • Stivarga (Regorafenib)
        • Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
        • Vectibix (Panitumumab)
        • Xeloda (Capecitabine)
        • Yervoy (Ipilimumab)
        • Zaltrap (Ziv-Aflibercept)
        • Ziv-Aflibercept

        Drug Combinations Used in Colon Cancer

        • CAPOX
        • FOLFIRI
        • FOLFIRI-BEVACIZUMAB
        • FOLFIRI-CETUXIMAB
        • FOLFOX
        • FU-LV
        • XELIRI
        • XELOX

        Drugs Approved for Rectal Cancer

        • Avastin (Bevacizumab)
        • Bevacizumab
        • Camptosar (Irinotecan Hydrochloride)
        • Capecitabine
        • Cetuximab
        • Cyramza (Ramucirumab)
        • Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin)
        • Erbitux (Cetuximab)
        • 5-FU (Fluorouracil Injection)
        • Fluorouracil Injection
        • Ipilimumab
        • Irinotecan Hydrochloride
        • Keytruda (Pembrolizumab)
        • Leucovorin Calcium
        • Lonsurf (Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride)
        • Mvasi (Bevacizumab)
        • Nivolumab
        • Opdivo (Nivolumab)
        • Oxaliplatin
        • Panitumumab
        • Pembrolizumab
        • Ramucirumab
        • Regorafenib
        • Stivarga (Regorafenib)
        • Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride
        • Vectibix (Panitumumab)
        • Xeloda (Capecitabine)
        • Yervoy (Ipilimumab)
        • Zaltrap (Ziv-Aflibercept)
        • Ziv-Aflibercept

        Drug Combinations Used in Rectal Cancer

        • CAPOX
        • FOLFIRI
        • FOLFIRI-BEVACIZUMAB
        • FOLFIRI-CETUXIMAB
        • FOLFOX
        • FU-LV
        • XELIRI
        • XELOX

        Drugs Approved for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

        • Afinitor (Everolimus)
        • Everolimus
        • Lanreotide Acetate
        • Somatuline Depot (Lanreotide Acetate)

        To Learn More About Rectal Cancer

        For more information from the National Cancer Institute about rectal cancer, see the following:

        • Colorectal Cancer Home Page
        • Colorectal Cancer Prevention
        • Colorectal Cancer Screening
        • Tests to Detect Colorectal Cancer and Polyps
        • Childhood Colorectal Cancer Treatment
        • Cryosurgery in Cancer Treatment
        • Drugs Approved for Colon and Rectal Cancer
        • Targeted Cancer Therapies
        • Genetic Testing for Inherited Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes

        For general cancer information and other resources from the National Cancer Institute, see the following:

        • About Cancer
        • Staging
        • Chemotherapy and You: Support for People With Cancer
        • Radiation Therapy and You: Support for People With Cancer
        • Coping with Cancer
        • Questions to Ask Your Doctor about Cancer
        • For Survivors and Caregivers

        References

        ByRx Harun

        What Is Biliary Colic? – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

        What Is Biliary Colic?/Biliary Colic is a common presentation of a stone in the cystic duct or common bile duct of the biliary tree. Colic refers to the type of pain that “comes and goes,” typically after eating a large, fatty meal which causes contraction of the gallbladder. However, the pain is usually constant and not colicky. Treatment of this disease is primarily surgical, involving removal of the gallbladder, typically using a laparoscopic technique. This medical condition does not typically require hospital admission. Biliary colic generally refers to the pain that occurs from a temporary obstruction of the biliary tree which resolves on its own. Prolonged obstruction of the biliary tree or complete impaction of a stone within the biliary tree will eventually lead to cholecystitis or cholangitis, at which pain the pain will constant and increasing.

        Causes Of Biliary Colic

        Biliary pain is most frequently caused by obstruction of the common bile duct or the cystic duct by a gallstone. Biliary pain may be associated with functional disorders of the biliary tract, so called acalculous biliary pain (pain without stones), and can even be found in patients post-cholecystectomy (removal of the gallbladder), possibly as a consequence of dysfunction of the biliary tree and the sphincter of Oddi.[rx]

        There are three main pathways in the formation of gallstones

        • Cholesterol supersaturation – Normally, bile can dissolve the amount of cholesterol excreted by the liver. But if the liver produces more cholesterol than bile can dissolve, the excess cholesterol may precipitate as crystals. Crystals are trapped in gallbladder mucus, producing gallbladder sludge. With time, the crystals may grow to form stones and occlude the ducts which ultimately produce the gallstone disease.
        • Excess bilirubin – Bilirubin, a yellow pigment derived from the breakdown of red blood cells, is secreted into bile by liver cells. Certain hematologic conditions cause the liver to make too much bilirubin through the processing of breakdown of hemoglobin. This excess bilirubin may also cause gallstone formation.
        • Gallbladder hypomotility or impaired contractility – If the gallbladder does not empty effectively, bile may become concentrated and form gallstones.
        • There’s too much bilirubin in your bile – Conditions like cirrhosis, infections, and blood disorders can cause your liver to make too much bilirubin.
        • Your gallbladder doesn’t empty all the way – This can make your bile very concentrated.
        • There’s too much cholesterol in your bile – Your body needs bile for digestion. It usually dissolves cholesterol. But when it can’t do that, the extra cholesterol might form stones.
        • Your gallbladder doesn’t empty correctly – If your gallbladder doesn’t empty completely or often enough, bile may become very concentrated, contributing to the formation of gallstones.
        • Being female
        • Obesity
        • Increasing age
        • Losing or gaining weight quickly
        • High-calorie diet
        • Pregnancy
        • Hormone therapy
        • Diabetes

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbcOzfkbDkc

        The Following Factors Are Known To Increase The Risk Of Gallstones

        • Age – The risk of developing gallstones increases with age, especially after you reach the age of 40.
        • Genes – If someone in your family has had gallstones.
        • Sex – Women are more likely to get gallstones than men. The female sex hormone estrogen is believed to increase the risk of gallstones.
        • Cirrhosis – A severe liver disease caused by metabolic disorders or excessive consumption of alcohol.
        • Being very overweight.
        • Losing a lot of weight in a short time – This happens a lot in very obese people who have surgery to make their stomach smaller.
        • Functional problems of the gallbladder – The organ cannot contract (squeeze bile out) properly.
        • Short bowel syndrome – A disorder that can develop after surgical removal of a large segment of the small bowel.
        • Special high – calorie liquid food.
        • Hemolysis – A disease that causes an increased breakdown of red blood cells.
        • Pregnancy.
        • Using the contraceptive pill or estrogen tablets during menopause (hormone therapy).
        • Diabetes.

        Symptoms Of Biliary Colic

        • Pain is the most common presenting symptom. It is usually described as sharp right upper quadrant pain that radiates to the right shoulder, or less commonly, behind the breastbone.[rx]
        • Nausea and vomiting can be associated with biliary colic.
        • Individuals may also present with pain that is induced following a fatty meal and the symptom of indigestion. The pain often lasts longer than 30 minutes, up to a few hours.[rx]
        • A person with biliary colic usually complains of an ache or a feeling of pressure in the upper abdomen. This pain can be in the center of the upper abdomen just below the breastbone, or in the upper right part of the abdomen near the gallbladder and liver.
        • Sudden and rapidly intensifying pain in the upper right portion of your abdomen
        • Sudden and rapidly intensifying pain in the center of your abdomen, just below your breastbone
        • Back pain between your shoulder blades
        • Pain in your right shoulder
        • Nausea or vomiting
        • Pain in your upper belly, often on the right, just under your ribs
        • Pain in your right shoulder or back
        • An upset stomach
        • Other digestive problems, including indigestion, heartburn, and gas
        • Belly pain that lasts several hours
        • Fever and chills
        • Yellow skin or eyes
        • Dark urine and light-colored poop

        Diagnosis Of Biliary Colic

        Your doctor will do a physical exam and might order tests including

        • Full blood count (FBC)
        • Liver function tests (LFTs)
        • Serum creatinine
        • CRP
        • Serum amylase
        • Urine dipstick
        • FBC and CRP – assess for the presence of any inflammatory response, which will be raised in cholecystitis
        • LFTs – biliary colic and acute cholecystitis are likely to show a raised ALP (indicating ductal occlusion), yet ALT and bilirubin should remain within normal limits (unless a Mirizzi syndrome, discussed below)
        • Amylase (or lipase) – to check for any evidence of pancreatitis
        • Blood tests – These check for signs of infection or blockage and rule out other conditions.
        • Ultrasound – This makes images of the inside of your body.
        • Abdominal ultrasound – This test is the one most commonly used to look for signs of gallstones. Abdominal ultrasound involves moving a device (transducer) back and forth across your stomach area. The transducer sends signals to a computer, which creates images that show the structures in your abdomen.
        • CT scan – Specialized X-rays let your doctor see inside your body, including your gallbladder.
        • Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) – This test uses a magnetic field and pulses of radio wave energy to take pictures of the inside of your body, including your liver and gallbladder.
        • Cholescintigraphy (HIDA scan) – This test can check whether your gallbladder squeezes correctly. Your doctor injects a harmless radioactive material that makes its way to the organ. A technician can then watch its movement.
        • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) – Your doctor runs a tube called an endoscope through your mouth down to your small intestine. They inject a dye so they can see your bile ducts on a camera in the endoscope. They can often take out any gallstones that have moved into the ducts.
        • Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) – This procedure can help identify smaller stones that may be missed on an abdominal ultrasound. During EUS your doctor passes a thin, flexible tube (endoscope) through your mouth and through your digestive tract. A small ultrasound device (transducer) in the tube produces sound waves that create a precise image of surrounding tissue.

        Treatment Of Biliary Colic

        Non-Pharmacological

        • Supportive therapy and dietary modifications –  elective cholecystectomy only for symptomatic patients who are surgical candidates or asymptomatic patients at risk of gallbladder cancer
        • Supportive therapy – Fasting or dietary modification (decreased fat intake)

        Medication

        • Spasmolytics – (e.g., dicyclomine)
        • Analgesia – NSAIDsopioids
        • Oral ursodeoxycholic acid – has also been used to help dissolve gallstones.
        • Electrolyte and Fluid imbalance – Initial management includes the relief of symptoms and correcting electrolyte and fluid imbalance that may occur with vomiting.[rx]
        • Antiemetics – such as dimenhydrinate, are used to treat nausea.[rx] Ondansetron (Zofran), Promethazine (Phenergan)
        • Antispasmodic are preferred – Scopolamine or Glycopyrrolate (Robinul)
          1. Parenteral: 0.1 to 0.2 mg IV or IM
          2. Oral: 1.0 to 2.0 mg orally bid to tid
        • Pain may be treated with anti-inflammatories NSAIDs – such as ketorolac or diclofenac.[rx]
        • Opioids, such as morphine – less commonly may be used.[rx] NSAIDs are more or less equivalent to opioids.[rx]
        • Hyoscine butylbromide – an antispasmodic, is also indicated in biliary colic.[rx]
        • Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL)
        • Antibiotics – In biliary colic, the risk of infection is minimal and therefore antibiotics are not required. The presence of infection indicates cholecystitis.[rx]
        • Cholesterol gallstones – can sometimes be dissolved with ursodeoxycholic acid taken by mouth, but it may be necessary for the person to take this medication for years.[rx]

        Surgery

        There Are Following Types of Surgical Options For Cholecystectomy

        • Open cholecystectomy – is performed via an abdominal incision (laparotomy) below the lower right ribs. Recovery typically requires 3–5 days of hospitalization, with a return to normal diet a week after release and to normal activity several weeks after release.[rx]
        • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy – introduced in the 1980s, is performed via three to four small puncture holes for a camera and instruments. Post-operative care typically includes a same-day release or a one-night hospital stay, followed by a few days of home rest and pain medication.[rx]
        • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy – (removal of the gallbladder through multiple small incisions; this is less invasive and a more commonly used technique)
        • Lithotripsy – (the technique that uses electric shock waves to dissolve gallstones; it is not commonly used today). Open cholecystectomy (removal of the gallbladder through a single, large incision; this is a more invasive and less commonly used technique)

        References

        ByRx Harun

        Chronic Cholecystitis – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

        Chronic cholecystitis is a prolonged, subacute condition caused by the mechanical or functional dysfunction of the emptying of the gallbladder. It presents with chronic symptomatology that can be accompanied by acute exacerbations of more pronounced symptoms (acute biliary colic), or it can progress to a more severe form of cholecystitis requiring urgent intervention (acute cholecystitis). There are classic signs and symptoms associated with this disease as well as prevalence in certain patient populations. The two forms of chronic cholecystitis are with cholelithiasis (with gallstones), and acalculous (without gallstones).

        Cholecystitis is inflammation of the gallbladder. Symptoms include right upper abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and occasionally fever. Often gallbladder attacks (biliary colic) precede acute cholecystitis. The pain lasts longer in cholecystitis than in a typical gallbladder attack. Without appropriate treatment, recurrent episodes of cholecystitis are common.[1] Complications of acute cholecystitis include gallstone pancreatitis, common bile duct stones, or inflammation of the common bile duct.[rx][rx]

        Types of Chronic Cholecystitis

        The following types of  cholecystitis 

        • Acute calculous cholecystitisGallstones blocking the flow of bile account for 90% of cases of cholecystitis (acute calculous cholecystitis). The blockage of bile flow leads to thickening and buildup of bile causing an enlarged, red, and tense gallbladder.[rx] The gallbladder is initially sterile but often becomes infected by bacteria, predominantly E. coli, Klebsiella, Streptococcus, and Clostridium species.[rx] Inflammation can spread to the outer covering of the gallbladder and surrounding structures such as the diaphragm, causing referred right shoulder pain.[rx]
        • Acalculous cholecystitis – In acalculous cholecystitis, no stone is in the biliary ducts.[rx] It accounts for 5–10% of all cases of cholecystitis and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.[rx] Acalculous cholecystitis is typically seen in people who are hospitalized and critically ill.[rx] Males are more likely to develop acute cholecystitis following surgery in the absence of trauma. It is associated with many causes including vasculitis, chemotherapy, major trauma or burns.[rx]
        • Chronic cholecystitis – Chronic cholecystitis occurs after repeated episodes of acute cholecystitis and is almost always due to gallstones.[rx] Chronic cholecystitis may be asymptomatic, may present as a more severe case of acute cholecystitis, or may lead to a number of complications such as gangrene, perforation, or fistula formation.[rx][rx] Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) is a rare form of chronic cholecystitis that mimics gallbladder cancer although it is not cancerous.[rx][rx] It was first reported in the medical literature in 1976 by McCoy and colleagues.[rx][rx]

        Causes of Chronic Cholecystitis

        Cholecystitis occurs when your gallbladder becomes inflamed. Gallbladder inflammation can be caused by:

        • Gallstones – Most often, cholecystitis is the result of hard particles that develop in your gallbladder (gallstones). Gallstones can block the tube (cystic duct) through which bile flows when it leaves the gallbladder. Bile builds up, causing inflammation.
        • Tumor – A tumor may prevent bile from draining out of your gallbladder properly, causing bile buildup that can lead to cholecystitis.
        • Bile duct blockage – Kinking or scarring of the bile ducts can cause blockages that lead to cholecystitis.
        • Infection – AIDS and certain viral infections can trigger gallbladder inflammation.
        • Blood vessel problems – A very severe illness can damage blood vessels and decrease blood flow to the gallbladder, leading to cholecystitis.
        • Acute cholecystitis – occurs when bile becomes trapped in the gallbladder. This often happens because a gallstone blocks the cystic duct, the tube through which bile travels into and out of the gallbladder. When a stone blocks this duct, bile builds up, causing irritation and pressure in the gallbladder. This can lead to swelling and infection.
        • Other causes include
          • Serious illnesses, such as HIV or diabetes
          • Tumors of the gallbladder (rare)

          Some people are more at risk for gallstones. Risk factors include:

          • Being female
          • Pregnancy
          • Hormone therapy
          • Older age
          • Being Native American or Hispanic
          • Obesity
          • Losing or gaining weight rapidly
          • Diabetes

        Symptoms of Chronic Cholecystitis

        Signs and symptoms of cholecystitis may include:

        • Pain. You may feel this discomfort in the center of the upper abdomen, just below the breastbone, or in the upper right portion of the abdomen, near the gallbladder and liver. In some people, the pain extends to the right shoulder. Symptoms typically start after eating.
        • Fever and possibly chills
        • Nausea and/or vomiting
        • Jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes), dark urine and pale, grayish bowel movements. These symptoms appear when gallstones pass out of the gallbladder and into the common bile duct, blocking the flow of bile out of the liver.
        • Severe pain in your upper right or center abdomen
        • Pain that spreads to your right shoulder or back
        • Tenderness over your abdomen when it’s touched
        • Nausea
        • Vomiting
        • Fever

        Diagnosis of Chronic Cholecystitis

        • Computed Tomography (CT)  In a CT scan, a rotating x-ray device moves around the patient and takes multiple detailed images of organs and body parts. Sometimes patients are injected with a contrast agent before images are taken, for better visualization of the body part being examined. CT findings consistent with acute cholecystitis include gallbladder wall thickening, gallbladder distention, pericholecystic fluid, and pericholecystic fat.
        • Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)  An MRCP is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test that produces detailed images of the hepatobiliary and pancreatic systems. Images are created using a magnetic field and radiofrequency pulses. Patients undergoing MRI are placed on to a table that is moved into the center of the MRI machine. Some patients are given contrast material before the MRI. MRCP findings indicative of acute cholecystitis include gallbladder stones, wall thickening, and pericholecystic fluid.
        • Ultrasound (U/S)During a U/S, a transducer is placed over the organ of interest. The transducer generates sound waves that pass through the body and produce echoes that are analyzed by a computer to produce images of the body part being analyzed. U/S findings consistent with acute cholecystitis include the visualization of gallstones, intraluminal sludge, thickening of the gallbladder wall, pericholecystic fluid, increased blood flow in the gallbladder wall, and sonographic Murphy’s sign. Murphy’s sign of cholecystitis refers to pain felt by the patient on taking a deep breath while pressure is placed in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen.
        • Abdominal CT – Computed tomography (CT) uses x-rays to produce detailed pictures of the abdomen, liver, gallbladder, bile ducts and intestine to help identify inflammation of the gallbladder or blocked bile flow. Sometimes (but not always) it can also show gallstones.
        • Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) – MRCP is a type of MRI exam that makes detailed images of the liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, pancreas and pancreatic duct. It is very good at showing gallstones, gallbladder or bile duct inflammation, and blocked bile flow.
        • Hepatobiliary nuclear imaging – This nuclear medicine test uses an injected radiotracer to help evaluate disorders of the liver, gallbladder and bile duct (biliary system). In acute cholecystitis, it can detect blockage of the cystic duct (the duct that is always blocked with acute cholecystitis).

        Treatment of Chronic Cholecystitis

        Initial treatment

        Initial treatment will usually involve

        • not eating or drinking (fasting) to take the strain off your gallbladder
        • receiving fluids through a drip directly into a vein (intravenously) to prevent dehydration
        • taking medicine to relieve your pain

        You’ll also be given antibiotics if it’s thought you have an infection. These often need to be continued for up to a week, during which time you may need to stay in the hospital, or you may be able to go home.

        After initial treatment, any gallstones that may have caused acute cholecystitis usually fall back into the gallbladder and the inflammation will often settle down.

        Your doctor may suggest

        • Fasting to rest the gallbladder
        • A special, low-fat diet
        • Pain medication
        • Antibiotics to treat the infection

        Surgery

        About 20% of patients with acute cholecystitis need emergency surgery. Such surgery is indicated if the patient’s condition deteriorates or when generalized peritonitis or emphysematous cholecystitis is present. These features suggest gangrene or perforation of the gall bladder.

        • Cholecystectomy – The timing of surgery for 80% of patients without evidence of gangrene or perforation is under debate. Open cholecystectomy traditionally has been performed 6-12 weeks after the acute episode to allow the inflammatory process to resolve before the procedure (interval surgery).[ Patients with acute cholecystitis who undergo early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (before symptoms have lasted 72-96 hours) have lower complication rates and lower conversion rates than open cholecystectomy and shorter hospital stays than those undergoing interval surgery.
        • Laparoscopic surgery – The surgeon uses the belly button and several small cuts to insert a laparoscope to see inside the abdomen and remove the gallbladder. You will be asleep for the surgery. Early laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in patients with acute cholecystitis. If early intervention—less than 72 hours after symptoms started—can be achieved, “edema planes” present during this period allow the gall bladder to be dissected laparoscopically.
        • Open surgery – The surgeon makes a cut in the abdomen and removes the gallbladder. You will be asleep for the surgery.

        If you cannot have surgery, your doctor may drain bile from the gallbladder. This may be done by:

        • Percutaneous cholecystostomy – This procedure is done by a radiologist. It places a tube through the skin directly into the gallbladder using ultrasound or CT guidance. Blocked or infected bile is removed to reduce inflammation. This procedure is typically done in patients who are too sick to have their gallbladder removed. You will be sedated for this procedure. The tube typically has to stay in for at least a few weeks.
        • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) – This procedure is typically done by a doctor who specializes in abdominal disorders (a gastroenterologist). A camera on a flexible tube is passed from the mouth through the stomach and into the beginning of the small bowel. This is where the common bile duct meets the small intestine. The valve mechanism (called the sphincter) at the end of the bile duct can be examined and opened to clear blocked bile and stones, if necessary. Doctors can also insert a small tube into the main bile duct and inject contrast material to better see the duct. They also may use a laser fiber to destroy small gallstones or use a basket or balloon to retrieve stones or stone fragments. All of this may be done without making any incisions in the abdomen. This procedure poses a small, but real risk of pancreas inflammation or injury. You will be sedated for this procedure.
        • Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) – This procedure is done by a radiologist. A needle is placed in the bile ducts within the liver using imaging guidance. Contrast material is injected to help locate gallstones that may be blocking bile flow. Some stones can be removed during a PTC. Others may be bypassed by leaving a small stent in place to allow bile to get around the area of blockage. This helps reduce inflammation. You will be sedated for this procedure.
        • Percutaneous cholecystostomy – is a minimally invasive procedure that can benefit patients with serious comorbidity who are at high risk from major surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy can be performed at the bedside under local anesthetic and is suitable for patients in intensive care units and those with burns. It is the definitive treatment in patients with acalculous cholecystitis (see below), or it may be used as a temporizing measure—to drain infected bile and delay the need for definitive treatment.
        • Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy – where the gallbladder is removed through a single cut, which is usually made near the bellybutton.

        References

        ByRx Harun

        Mirizzi Syndrome – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

        Mirizzi syndrome is a rare condition caused by the obstruction of the common bile duct or common hepatic duct by external compression from multiple impacted gallstones or a single large impacted gallstone in Hartman’s pouch. Presenting symptoms are similar to cholecystitis but may be confused with other obstructing conditions such as common bile duct stones and ascending cholangitis due to the presence of jaundice. Preoperative diagnosis is often difficult and usually missed. This syndrome is named after the Argentinean surgeon Pablo Luis Mirizzi. He was born in 1893 in Cordoba Argentina. Mirizzi graduated from the Medical Sciences School at the National University of Cordoba in 1915. His most well-known contribution to surgery is having performed the first intraoperative cholangiogram in 1931. The first published paper describing the syndrome which bears his name today was in 1940.

        Causes of Mirizzi Syndrome

        Gallstones are usually formed from bile that is in stasis. When bile is not fully emptied from the gallbladder, it can precipitate as sludge and subsequently turn into stones. Biliary obstruction may also lead to gallstones including bile duct strictures and cancers, such as pancreatic cancer. The most common cause of cholelithiasis is from the precipitation of cholesterol that subsequently forms into cholesterol stones. The second form of gallstones is pigmented gallstones which are the result of increased red blood cell destruction in the intravascular system causing increased concentrations of bilirubin which subsequently get stored in the bile. These stones are typically black. The third type of gallstones is mixed pigmented stones which are a combination of calcium substrates such as calcium carbonate or calcium phosphate, cholesterol and bile. The fourth type is made up primarily of calcium and usually found in patients with hypercalcemia. When multiple gallstones or a singular large gallstone get impacted in Hartman’s pouch (the lower outpouching of the gallbladder), external compression of the common bile duct or the common hepatic duct can occur. The exact mechanism as to why this occurs is unknown, but it is felt to be related to a floppy Hartman’s pouch containing a higher mass of stones such as with multiple stones or a single large impacted stone. This causes subsequent inflammation of the are which can also lead to fistula formation over time.

        Pathophysiology of Mirizzi Syndrome

        Gallstones occur when substances in the bile reach their limits of solubility. As bile becomes concentrated in the gallbladder, it becomes supersaturated with these substances, which in time precipitate into small crystals. These crystals, in turn, become stuck in the gallbladder mucus, resulting in gallbladder sludge. Over time, these crystals grow and form large and/or multiple stones. These gallstones may cause symptoms of cholecystitis, but if they become embedded in a floppy Hartman’s pouch, they can cause additional findings of jaundice. As this condition progresses, internal fistulas from the gallbladder into the common bile duct, common hepatic duct (CHD) and the duodenum can develop. A grading system has been developed to categorize the various stages of Mirizzi syndrome.

        Type I: No Fistula Present

        • Type IA: Presence of the cystic duct
        • Type IB: Obliteration of the cystic duct

        Types II to IV: Fistula Present

        • Type II: Defect smaller than 33% of the CHD diameter
        • Type III: Defect 33% to 66% of the CHD diameter
        • Type IV: Defect larger than 66% of the CHD diameter

        Diagnosis of Mirizzi Syndrome

        Findings of acute or chronic cholecystitis can be found on histology. The gallbladder wall may be thickened to variable degrees, and there may be adhesions to the serosal surface. Smooth muscle hypertrophy, especially in prolonged chronic conditions, is present. Calcium bilirubinate or cholesterol stones are most often present and can vary in size from sand-like to filling the entire gallbladder lumen. They can be multiple or singular. The acalculous disease may reveal sludge or very viscous bile. These findings are usual precursors to gallstones and are formed from increased biliary salts or stasis. Normal appearing bile can also be present. Various species of bacteria can be found in 11% to 30% of the cases. Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses are present 90% of the time in cholecystitis specimens. These are a herniation of intraluminal sinuses from increased pressures possibly associated with ducts of Luschka. The mucosa will exhibit varying degrees of inflammation.

        There is an increased risk of developing gallbladder cancer with Mirizzi’s syndrome. The exact etiology is unclear but is felt to be due to persistent and recurrent irritation of the area and chronic biliary stasis. 5% to 28% of patients with Mirizzi syndrome were found to have gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy. Virtually all diagnoses were made postoperatively with pathologic examination of the specimens.

        History and Physical

        The presentation of Mirizzi syndrome is usually that of acute or chronic cholecystitis with the addition of jaundice. Patients with chronic cholecystitis usually present with dull right upper abdominal pain that radiates to the mid back or right scapular tip. It is usually associated with fatty food ingestion. Nausea and occasional vomiting also accompany complaints of increased bloating and flatulence. Often the symptoms occur in the evening. Prolonged less acute symptoms are usually present over weeks or months. Increased frequency and severeness of acute exacerbations (acute biliary colic) is usually seen in the presence of more prolonged chronic symptoms. The classic physical examination will demonstrate right upper abdominal pain with deep palpation (Murphy’s sign). Patients are usually not acutely ill but are uncomfortable. Patients with advanced Mirizzi syndrome or of more severe acute cholecystitis may present with more pronounced symptoms and findings. Jaundice is usually present, and at times, significantly elevated bilirubin can be identified.

        Evaluation

        The routine workup for cholecystitis should be initiated. The best test for diagnosing gallstones and subsequent acute cholecystitis is a right upper quadrant abdominal ultrasound. It is associated with a 90% specificity rate and depending on the ultrasound operator, can detect stones as small as 2 mm as well as sludge and gallbladder polyps. Ultrasound findings that point toward acute cholecystitis versus cholelithiasis include gallbladder wall thickening (greater than 3 mm), pericholecystic fluid and a positive sonographic Murphy’s sign. Gallstones can also often be found on CT scans, and MRIs, however, these studies are not as sensitive for acute cholecystitis. Approximately 10% of gallstones may be found on routine plain films due to their high calcium content. Air in the biliary tree may also be detected on these radiographic studies if there is an enteric fistula present. If there is a suspected stone in the common bile duct based on ultrasound results, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the next step. If a common duct stone is identified on the MRCP, then the gold-standard test of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) should be performed by a gastroenterologist. A percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram (PTHC) is also useful in diagnosing common bile duct stones if an ERCP is not possible. Usually, the diagnosis of Mirizzi syndrome is either mistaken for a simple common bile duct stone or is missed entirely on preoperative workup.

        Treatment of Mirizzi Syndrome

        The treatment for Mirizzi syndrome is cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferable, but if the condition is advanced, then a more involved surgery may be needed. An open cholecystectomy is an option. In cases of a more progressed disease, a partial cholecystectomy can be considered. This would involve leaving Hartman’s pouch in place and removing the body of the gallbladder and the gallstones. This will lower the incidence of injury to the porta hepatis and bile ducts. If a fistula is present then an open cholecystectomy with lienteric anastomosis possibly with a roux-n-y has been shown to be effective.

        References

        ByRx Harun

        Peptic Ulcer Disorder – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

        Peptic Ulcer Disorder(PUD) is characterized by discontinuation in the inner lining of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract because of gastric acid secretion or pepsin. It extends into the muscularis propria layer of the gastric epithelium. It usually occurs in the stomach and proximal duodenum. It may involve the lower esophagus, distal duodenum, or jejunum. Epigastric pain usually occurs within 15-30 minutes following a meal in patients with a gastric ulcer; on the other hand, the pain with a duodenal ulcer tends to occur 2-3 hours after a meal. Today, testing for Helicobacter pylori is recommended in all patients with peptic ulcer disease. Endoscopy may be required in some patients to confirm the diagnosis, especially in those patients with sinister symptoms. Today, most patients can be managed with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) based on triple-drug therapy.

        Causes of Peptic Ulcer Disorder

        Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) has various causes; however, Helicobacter pylori-associated PUD and NSAID-associated PUD account for the majority of the disease etiology.

        Causes of Peptic Ulcer Disease

        Common

        • H. pylori infection
        • NSAIDs
        • Medications

        Rare

        • Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
        • Malignancy (gastric/lung cancer, lymphomas)
        • Stress (Acute illness, burns, head injury)
        • Viral infection
        • Vascular insufficiency
        • Radiation therapy
        • Crohn disease
        • Chemotherapy

        Helicobacter Pylori-Associated PUD

        • H. pylorus is a gram-negative bacillus that is found within the gastric epithelial cells. This bacterium is responsible for 90% of duodenal ulcers and 70% to 90% of gastric ulcers. H. pylori infection is more prevalent among those with lower socioeconomic status and is commonly acquired during childhood. The organism has a wide spectrum of virulence factors allowing it to adhere to and inflame the gastric mucosa. This results in hypochlorhydria or achlorhydria, leading to gastric ulceration.

         Virulence Factors of  Helicobacter pylori

        • Urease  The secretion of urease breaks down urea into ammonia and protects the organism by neutralizing the acidic gastric environment.
        • Toxins CagA/VacA is associated with stomach mucosal inflammation and host tissue damage.
        • Flagella  Provides motility and allows movement toward the gastric epithelium.

        NSAID-associated PUD

        • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use is the second most common cause of PUD after H. pylori infection. The secretion of prostaglandin normally protects the gastric mucosa. NSAIDs block prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting COX-1 enzyme resulting in a decrease in gastric mucus and bicarbonate production and a decrease in mucosal blood flow.

        Medications

        • Apart from NSAIDs, corticosteroids, bisphosphonates, potassium chloride, steroids, and fluorouracil have been implicated in the etiology of PUD.
        • Smoking also appears to play a role in duodenal ulcers, but the correlation is not linear. Alcohol can irritate the gastric mucosa and induce acidity.

        Hypersecretory environments

        • Zollinger Ellison syndrome
        • Systemic mastocytosis
        • Cystic fibrosis
        • Hyperparathyroidism
        • Antral G cell hyperplasia

        Symptoms of Peptic Ulcer Disorder

        Signs and symptoms of peptic ulcer disease may vary depending upon the location of the disease and age. Gastric and duodenal ulcers can be differentiated from the timing of their symptoms in relation to meals. Nocturnal pain is common with duodenal ulcers. Those with gastric outlet obstruction commonly report a history of abdomen bloating and or fullness.

        Common signs and symptoms include

        • Epigastric abdominal pain
        • Bloating
        • Abdominal fullness
        • Nausea and vomiting
        • Weight loss/weight gain
        • Hematemesis
        • Melena
        • Unintentional weight loss
        • Progressive dysphagia
        • Overt gastrointestinal bleeding
        • Iron deficiency anemia
        • Recurrent emesis
        • Family history of upper gastrointestinal malignancy

        Diagnosis of Peptic Ulcer Disorder

        Diagnosis of PUD requires history taking, physical examination, and invasive/non-invasive medical tests.

        History

        • A careful history should be obtained and noted for the presence of any complications. Patient reporting of epigastric abdominal pain, early satiety, and fullness following a meal raise suspicion of PUD. The pain of gastric ulcers increases 2 to 3 hours after a meal and may result in weight loss, whereas the pain of duodenal ulcers decreases with a meal which can result in weight gain. Any patient presenting with anemia, melena, hematemesis, or weight loss should be further investigated for complications of PUD, predominantly bleeding, perforation, or cancer.

        Physical Exam

        • A physical exam may reveal epigastric abdominal tenderness and signs of anemia.

        Investigations

        • Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Gold standard and most accurate diagnostic test with sensitivity and specificity up to 90% in diagnosing gastric and duodenal ulcers. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has published guidelines on the role of endoscopy in patients presenting with upper abdominal pain or dyspeptic symptoms suggestive of PUD. Patients over 50 years of age and new onset of dyspeptic symptoms should get evaluated by an EGD. Anyone with the presence of alarm symptoms should undergo EGD irrespective of age.
        • Barium swallow  It is indicated when EGD is contraindicated.
        • Complete blood work – liver function, and levels of amylase and lipase
        • Serum gastric – is ordered if Zollinger Ellison syndrome is suspected

        Helicobacter pylori testing

        • Serologic testing
        • Urea breath test High sensitivity and specificity. It may be used to confirm eradication after 4 to 6 weeks of stopping treatment. In the presence of urease, an enzyme produced by H.pylori, the radiolabeled carbon dioxide produced by the stomach is exhaled by the lungs.
        • Antibodies – to H.pylori can also be measured
        • Stool antigen test
        • Urine-based ELISA and rapid urine test
        • Endoscopic biopsy Culture is not generally recommended as it is expensive, time-consuming, and invasive. It is indicated if eradication treatment fails or there is suspicion about antibiotic resistance. Biopsies from at least 4-6 sites are necessary to increase sensitivity. Gastric ulcers are commonly located on the lesser curvature between the antrum and fundus. The majority of duodenal ulcers are located in the first part of the duodenum.
        • Computerized tomography – of the abdomen with contrast is of limited value in the diagnosis of PUD itself but is helpful in the diagnosis of its complications like perforation and gastric outlet obstruction.

        Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disorder

        Medical treatment

        Antisecretory drugs used for PUD include H2-receptor antagonists and the proton pump inhibitor (PPIs). PPIs have largely replaced H2 receptor blockers due to their superior healing and efficacy. PPIs block acid production in the stomach, providing relief of symptoms and promote healing.

        • Corticosteroid, bisphosphonates, and anticoagulants should also be discontinued if possible. Prostaglandin analogs (misoprostol) are sometimes used as prophylaxis for NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.
        • First-line treatment for H. pylori-induced PUD is a triple regimen comprising two antibiotics and a proton pump inhibitor. Pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole or amoxicillin are used for 7 to 14 days.
        • Antibiotics and PPIs work synergistically to eradicate H. pylori. The antibiotic selected should take into consideration the presence of antibiotic resistance in the environment.
        • If first-line therapy fails, quadruple therapy with bismuth and different antibiotics is used.

        NSAIDs induced PUD can be treated by stopping the use of NSAIDs or switching to a lower dose.

        Treatment may be incorporated with calcium supplements as long-term use of the PPIs can increase the risk of bone fractures.

        Refractory disease and Surgical treatment

        Surgical treatment is indicated if the patient is unresponsive to medical treatment, noncompliant, or at high risk of complications. A refractory peptic ulcer is one over 5 mm in diameter that does not heal despite 8-12 weeks of PPI therapy. The common causes are persistent H/pylori infection, continued use of NSAIDs or significant comorbidities that impair ulcer healing or other conditions like gastrinoma or gastric cancer. If the ulcer persists despite addressing the above risk factors, patients can be candidates for surgical treatment. Surgical options include vagotomy or partial gastrectomy.

        Differential Diagnosis

        The following conditions can present with symptoms similar to peptic ulcer disease and it is important to be familiar with their clinical presentation in order to make the correct diagnosis.

        • Gastritis – an inflammatory process of the gastric mucosa from immune-mediated or infectious etiology presenting with upper abdominal pain and nausea. Clinical presentation is very similar to that of peptic ulcer disease.
        • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) – Patients usually describe a burning sensation in the epigastrium and lower retrosternal area, excessive salivation, or intermittent regurgitation of food material.
        • Gastric cancer – apart from abdominal pain, patients usually describe alarm symptoms like weight loss, melena, recurrent vomiting, or evidence of malignancy elsewhere in the case of metastasis.
        • Pancreatitis – epigastric or right upper quadrant pain that is more persistent and severe, worse in the supine position and patients usually have a history of alcoholism or gallstones. Elevated serum amylase and lipase are useful in the diagnosis.
        • Biliary colic – intermittent, severe deep pain in the right upper quadrant or epigastrium precipitated by fatty meals.
        • Cholecystitis – right upper quadrant or epigastric pain that usually lasts for hours and is exacerbated by fatty meals and is associated with nausea and vomiting. Fever, tachycardia, positive Murphy’s sign, leukocytosis, and abnormal liver functions help further distinguish this from biliary colic.
        • Myocardial infarction – especially in inferior wall and right ventricular involvement, sometimes patients can present with epigastric pain with nausea and vomiting. The presence of other symptoms like dizziness, shortness of breath, and abnormal vital signs in a high-risk patient should alert the clinician to look for this.
        • Mesenteric ischemia – while acute mesenteric ischemia presents with severe, acute onset abdominal pain; the chronic variant usually presents with ongoing post-prandial epigastric pain and can be mistaken for peptic ulcer disease. Older age, presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis, and weight loss should prompt a workup for the same.
        • Mesenteric vasculitis – unexplained abdominal symptoms with or without lower gastrointestinal bleeding in a patient with other features from underlying systemic vasculitis should raise the suspicion of mesenteric vasculitis.

        Prevention Of Peptic Ulcer Disorder

        There are a lot of things you can do to prevent the symptoms of GERD. Some simple lifestyle changes include

        • Elevate the head of your bed at least six inches. If possible, put wooden blocks under the legs at the head of the bed. Or, use a solid foam wedge under the head portion of the mattress. Simply using extra pillows may not help.
        • Avoid foods that cause the esophageal sphincter to relax during their digestion. These include:
          • Coffee
          • Chocolate
          • Fatty foods
          • Whole milk
          • Peppermint
          • Spearmint
        • Limit acidic foods that make the irritation worse when they are regurgitated. These include citrus fruits and tomatoes.
        • Excess pounds put pressure on your abdomen, pushing up your stomach and causing acid to reflux into your esophagus.
        • Smoking decreases the lower esophageal sphincter’s ability to function properly.
        • If you regularly experience heartburn while trying to sleep, place wood or cement blocks under the feet of your bed so that the head end is raised by 6 to 9 inches. If you can’t elevate your bed, you can insert a wedge between your mattress and box spring to elevate your body from the waist up. Raising your head with additional pillows isn’t effective.
        • Wait at least three hours after eating before lying down or going to bed.
        • Put down your fork after every bite and pick it up again once you have chewed and swallowed that bite.
        • Common triggers include fatty or fried foods, tomato sauce, alcohol, chocolate, mint, garlic, onion, and caffeine.
        • Clothes that fit tightly around your waist put pressure on your abdomen and the lower esophageal sphincter.
        • Avoid carbonated beverages. Burps of gas force the esophageal sphincter to open and can promote reflux.
        • Eat smaller, more frequent meals.
        • Do not eat during the three to four hours before you go to bed.
        • Avoid drinking alcohol. It loosens the esophageal sphincter.
        • Lose weight if you are obese. Obesity can make it harder for the esophageal sphincter to stay closed.
        • Avoid wearing tight-fitting garments. Increased pressure on the abdomen can open the esophageal sphincter.
        • Use lozenges or gum to keep producing saliva.
        • Do not lie down after eating.

        Complications Of Peptic Ulcer 

        • Perforation – A hole develops in the lining of the stomach or small intestine and causes an infection. A sign of a perforated ulcer is sudden, severe abdominal pain.
        • Internal bleeding – Bleeding ulcers can result in significant blood loss and thus require hospitalization. Signs of a bleeding ulcer include lightheadedness, dizziness, and black stools.
        • Scar tissue – This is thick tissue that develops after an injury. This tissue makes it difficult for food to pass through your digestive tract. Signs of scar tissue include vomiting and weight loss.
        • Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common complication. Sudden large bleeding can be life-threatening. It occurs when the ulcer erodes one of the blood vessels, such as the gastroduodenal artery.
        • Perforation (a hole in the wall of the gastrointestinal tract) often leads to catastrophic consequences if left untreated. Erosion of the gastro-intestinal wall by the ulcer leads to spillage of the stomach or intestinal content into the abdominal cavity. Perforation at the anterior surface of the stomach leads to acute peritonitis, initially chemical and later bacterial peritonitis. The first sign is often sudden intense abdominal pain; an example is Valentino’s syndrome, named after the silent-film actor who experienced this pain before his death. Posterior wall perforation leads to bleeding due to the involvement of the gastroduodenal artery that lies posterior to the first part of the duodenum.
        • Penetration is a form of perforation in which the hole leads to and the ulcer continues into adjacent organs such as the liver and pancreas.
        • Gastric outlet obstruction is a narrowing of the pyloric canal by scarring and swelling of the gastric antrum and duodenum due to peptic ulcers. The person often presents with severe vomiting without bile.
        • Cancer is included in the differential diagnosis (elucidated by biopsy), Helicobacter pylori as the etiological factor making it 3 to 6 times more likely to develop stomach cancer from the ulcer.

        References

        ByRx Harun

        What Is Lung Cancer? – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

        What Is Lung Cancer?/Lung cancer or bronchogenic carcinoma refers to tumors originating in the lung parenchyma or within bronchi. It is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Lung cancer is responsible for more deaths in women than breast cancer. It is interesting to note that at the beginning of the 20th century, lung cancer was a relatively rare disease. Its dramatic rise in later decades is mostly attributable to the increase in smoking among both males and females.

        Causes of Lung Cancer

        Smoking is the most common cause of lung cancer. It is estimated that 90% of the cases of lung cancer are attributable to smoking. The risk is highest in males who smoke. The risk is further compounded with exposure to other carcinogens, such as asbestos. There is no correlation between lung cancer and the number of packs smoked per year due to the complex interplay between smoking and environmental and genetic factors. The risk of lung cancer by passive smoking increases by 20% to 30%. Other factors include radiation for non-lung cancer treatment, especially non-Hodgkins lymphoma and breast cancer. Exposure to metals, such as chromium, nickel, and arsenic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons also is associated with lung cancer. Lung diseases like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis increase risk of lung cancer independent of smoking.

        The broad divisions of SCLC and NSCLC represent more than 95% of all lung cancers.

        Small Cell Lung Cancer

        • Histologically, SCLC is characterized by small cells with scant cytoplasm and no distinct nucleoli. The WHO (World Health Organization) classifies SCLC into three cell subtypes: oat cell, intermediate cell, and combined cell (SCLC with NSCLC component, squamous, or adenocarcinoma).
        • SCLC is almost usually with smoking. It has a higher doubling time and metastasizes early; therefore, it is always considered a systemic disease at diagnosis. The central nervous system, liver, and bone are the most common sites. Certain tumor markers help differentiate SCLC from NSCLC. The most commonly tested tumor markers are thyroid transcription factor-1, CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin. Characteristically, NSCLC is associated with a paraneoplastic syndrome which could be the presenting feature of the disease

        Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

        Five Types of NSCLC

        • Squamous cell carcinoma – is characterized by the presence of intercellular bridges and keratinization. These NSCLCs are associated with smoking and occur predominantly in men. Squamous cell cancers can present as Pancoast tumor and hypercalcemia. Pancoast tumor is the tumor in the superior sulcus of the lung. The brain is the most common site of recurrence postsurgery in cases of Pancoast tumor.
        • Adenocarcinoma –  is the most common histologic subtype of NSCLC. It is also the most common cancer in women and non-smokers. Classic histochemical markers include Napsin A, Cytokeratin-7, and thyroid transcription factor-1. Lung adenocarcinoma is further subdivided into acinar, papillary and mixed subtypes.
        • Adenosquamous carcinoma – comprises 0.4 % to 4% of diagnosed NSCLC. It is defined as having more than 10% mixed glandular and squamous components. It has a poorer prognosis than either squamous and adenocarcinomas. Molecular testing is recommended for these cancers.
        • Large cell carcinoma – lacks the differentiation of a small cell and glandular or squamous cells.
        • Carcinoid tumors – include two subtypes: typical and atypical. Typical carcinoid carries relatively better prognosis and is only occasionally associated with carcinoid syndrome.
        • Apart from this, there is anecdotal evidence of rare and unusual forms of non-small cell lung cancer which includes but are not limited to giant cell carcinoma of the lung and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung.

        Toxicokinetics

        • Multiple compounds have been implicated as the cause of lung cancer. In reality, it is hard to establish a causal relationship due to a battery of other confounding factors, such as the difference in the quantity of exposure time, smoking status.
        • Among the chemicals considered responsible, asbestos is the only one that has a clear causal relationship with the development of lung cancer.

        Asbestos and Lung Cancer

        • The risk depends on exposure time and type of asbestos. Amphibole fibers confer a much higher risk of lung cancer than chrysotile fibers. The risk increases considerably with concurrent smoking. In non-smokers who are exposed to asbestos, there is a six-fold increase in the risk of lung cancer; whereas, in smokers, this risk is 16-fold if a minimum of 20 cigarettes smoked per day and nine-fold increase with less than 20 cigarettes per day. Other compounds that may increase the risk of lung cancer include radon, nickel, cadmium, chromium, silica, and arsenic.

        Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

        No specific signs and symptoms exist for lung cancer. Most patients already have advanced disease at the time of presentation. Lung cancer symptoms occur due to local effects of the tumor, such as cough due to bronchial compression by the tumor, due to distant metastasis, stroke-like symptoms secondary to brain metastasis, paraneoplastic syndrome, and kidney stones due to persistent hypercalcemia. Specifically:

        • A cough, dyspnea, and hemoptysis are common presenting symptoms.
        • A cough is the most common symptom, accounting for 50% to 75% of cases. It is sensitive but not specific. Squamous cell and small cell cancers usually cause a cough early due to the involvement of the central airways.
        • Dyspnea or shortness of breath represents lung cancer in 25% to 40% of cases.
        • Hemoptysis is an important symptom in anyone with a history of smoking. Although bronchitis is the most common cause of hemoptysis, 20% to 50% of patients with underlying lung cancer present with hemoptysis.
        • Rarely, patients present with shoulder pain, Horner syndrome, and hand muscle atrophy. This constellation of symptoms is called Pancoast syndrome. It is due to lung cancers arising in the superior sulcus.

        Evaluation

        • Lung cancer is the leading cause of death in both men and women. NSCLC accounts for 85% of diagnosed cases of lung cancer in the United States. The overall goal is timely diagnosis and accurate staging. As per the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines, the initial evaluation should be complete within 6 weeks in patients with tolerable symptoms and no complications. Only 26% and 8% of cancers are diagnosed at stages I and II, whereas 28% and 38% are diagnosed at stages III and IV respectively. Therefore, curative surgery is an option for a minority of patients.

        Lung cancer evaluation can be divided in 2 ways:

        • Radiological staging
        • Invasive staging

        Goals of Initial Evaluation

        • Clinical extent and stage of the disease
        • Optimal target site and modality of 1st tissue biopsy
        • Specific histologic subtypes
        • Presence of co-morbidities, para-neoplastic syndromes
        • Patient values and preferences regarding therapy

        Radiologic Staging

        Every patient suspected of having lung cancer should undergo the following tests:

        • Contrast-enhanced CT chest with extension to upper abdomen up to the level of adrenal glands
        • Imaging with PET or PET-CT directed at sites of potential metastasis when symptoms or focal findings are present or when chest CT shows evidence of advanced disease

        CT Scan

        • Intravenous (IV) contrast enhancement is preferable as it may distinguish mediastinal invasion of the primary tumor or metastatic lymph nodes from vascular structures.
        • The major advantage of CT is that it provides an accurate anatomic definition of the tumor within the thorax which helps clinicians to decide the optimal biopsy site.

        CT can also identify the following:

        • Tumor-related atelectasis
        • Post obstructive pneumonitis
        • Intra- or extrathoracic metastatic disease
        • Co-existing lung disease

        The main objective of a CT scan is to identify the extent of the tumor, its anatomical location, and the lymph node involvement. TNM staging relies heavily on lymph node involvement. Therefore, most of the societies in Europe and the United States agree to regard a lymph node of 1 centimeter or more in the short axis to be considered as highly suspicious for malignancy. Lymph nodes can be enlarged secondary to acute inflammation, such as with congestive heart failure exacerbation or recent viral infection. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT scan to identify malignancy are 55% and 81% respectively. Hence, CT is not a good test for lung cancer staging.

        Radiological Groups

        The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) has proposed grouping patients based on tumor extent and lymph node involvement. Although CT is not the right staging tool, it helps the clinician select the site for tissue biopsy. In other words, based on these groups, further staging via non-invasive or invasive methods is planned.

        Group A

        • Patients with bulky tumor encircling/invading mediastinal structures such that remote lymph nodes cannot be distinguished from the primary tumor.
        • Mediastinal invasion is implied, therefore, no need for LN sampling. Tissue diagnosis suffices.

        Group B

        • Patients with discrete lymph node enlargement greater than 1 centimeter such that an isolated lymph node can be distinguished from the primary tumor
        • Lymph node sampling is required for pathologic confirmation before curative intent therapy.

        Group C

        • Patients with a central tumor and elevated risk of nodal disease despite normal-sized nodes, such as high risk for N2/3 disease.
        • Lymph node sampling is needed even if CT/PET negative due to a high risk of N2/N3 disease.

        Group D

        • Patients with low risk of N2/3 involvement or distant metastatic disease, such as peripheral T1 tumors.
        • Invasive testing is not done routinely except if suspicion of N1 disease is high or patient is not a candidate for surgery but going for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

        Invasive Staging

        After CT and PET scans, the next step is to obtain tissue or pathologic confirmation of malignancy, confirm staging, and histological differentiation of cancer. One of the following procedures achieves this.

        • Bronchoscopic Endobronchial Ultrasound-Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (TBNA)
        • Endoscopic-TBNA
        • Mediastinoscopy
        • Thoracoscopy or video-assisted thoracoscopy(VATS)

        CT guided a transthoracic biopsy is an option for peripheral lesions with a low risk of pneumothorax. Certain older procedures, such as the Chamberlain procedure, is sometimes required.

        Bronchoscopic TBNA

        • Convex Probe-Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided (EBUS)-TBNA
        • Radial Probe-EBUS-TBNA
        • Navigation Bronchoscopy

        CP-EBUS Bronchoscopy

        • This is a bronchoscopic technique in which a miniature convex ultrasound of 7.5 MHZ is attached to the tip of the bronchoscope. It provides direct visualization of structures in the mediastinum or lung parenchyma through the bronchial wall. A biopsy is performed in real-time.
        • It mainly is used to sample the mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. The image can be frozen and measured, and there is also Doppler available to identify blood vessels. It is the procedure of choice for this purpose. CP-EBUS is also the procedure of choice postinduction chemotherapy before surgery to confirm complete remission. CP-EBUS can be used to sample upper and lower paratracheal nodes as well as stations 10, 11, and 12. Stations 3, 5, and 6 are not accessible via CP-EBUS.

        RP-EBUS Bronchoscopy

        • Instead of a convex probe, there is a miniature (20 to 30 MHz) probe. The advantages are that smaller lesions or lesions that are more peripheral can be reached, and it provides a 360-degree view of lung parenchyma. A real-time biopsy cannot be performed.

        Navigation Bronchoscopy

        • The concept is to construct a navigational map of airways using either CT scan or electromagnetic field. After the map is constructed, the software creates the path to reach the location of the nodule. The bronchoscopist can create the pathway, and the software then navigates the bronchoscopist to the biopsy site.

        Endoscopic-TBNA

        • Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is becoming an increasingly useful tool for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. It can sample lymph nodes through the esophageal wall and provides a real-time sampling of stations 2, 4, 7, 8, and 9.
        • The latter 2 stations cannot be sampled by Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). It has the same sensitivity and specificity of EUS, 89%, and 100% respectively. There is also a growing trend to combine EBUS and EUS as a minimally invasive technique for lung cancer staging.

        Mediastinoscopy

        • Mediastinoscopy was formerly the gold standard for lung cancer diagnosis and staging. Now it is mainly used to sample lymph nodes after negative needle technique and when the patient is still at high risk for cancer due to lymph node size or FDG uptake on PET scan.
        • Most commonly, para-tracheal lymph nodes are sampled. Alternatively, an anterior mediastinoscopy (Chamberlain procedure) can be performed to access subaortic and para-aortic nodes, stations 5 and 6 respectively. Mediastinoscopy has a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 100%. Like all surgical procedures, mediastinoscopy has some risks. General anesthesia is required, and the procedure carries a mortality risk of 0.08%.

        Thoracoscopy

        • Traditionally, thoracoscopy was performed by dividing the ribs and opening the chest cavity. Like laparoscopic surgery, it has largely replaced open abdominal surgeries. Video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) has replaced thoracoscopy.
        • It is used to treat a number of chest wall, pleural, pulmonary, and mediastinal conditions. Mediastinal lymph node sampling, as well as full dissection during lung resection for cancer, can be performed with VATS. A newer version of VATS is called RATS (robotic-assisted thoracoscopy). There are no trials comparing VATS and RATS for mediastinal lymph node biopsy.

        Treatment of Lung Cancer

        Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

        Stage I

        • Surgery is the mainstay of treating stage 1 NSCLC. The procedure of choice is either lobectomy or pneumonectomy with mediastinal lymph node sampling. The 5-year survival is 78% for IA and 53% for IB disease. In patients who do not have the pulmonary reserve to tolerate pneumonectomy or lobectomy, a more conservative approach with wedge resection or segmentectomy can be done. The disadvantage is a higher local recurrence rate, but survival is the same. Local postoperative radiation therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy has not shown to improve outcomes in stage I disease.

        Stage II

        • The survival of stage IIA and IIB lung is 46% and 36% respectively. The preferred treatment is surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.
        • If the tumor has invaded the chest wall, then an en-bloc resection of the chest wall is recommended. Pancoast tumor is a unique tumor of stage II. It arises from the superior sulcus and usually diagnosed at a higher stage, IIB or IIIA. The treatment of choice in cases of Pancoast tumor is neoadjuvant chemotherapy usually with etoposide and cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy followed by resection. Overall survival is 44% to 54% depending on postsurgery presence or absence of microscopic disease in the resected specimen.

        Stage III

        • This is the most heterogeneous group, consisting of a wide variation of tumor invasion as well as lymph node involvement.
        • Stage IIIA disease with N1 lymph nodes surgery with curative intent is the treatment of choice. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients are found to have an N2 disease at the time of resection. The current consensus is to perform surgery as planned followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with stage IIIA tumors with N2/N3 lymph nodes, there is no agreement on treatment. If the patient has good performance status and no weigh-loss, then concurrent chemo-radiotherapy affords the best outcome. However, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is not as tolerated and can cause severe esophagitis. Sequential therapy is better tolerated. Survival is 40% to 45% in the first two years, but five-year survival is only 20%.
        • T4 tumors are usually treated exclusively with chemoradiation. Surgery may be an option in T4 N0-1 tumors with carinal involvement. The operative mortality of carinal resection is 10% to 15%, and survival is approximately 20%. If a tumor is T4 due to ipsilateral nonprimary lobe nodules with no mediastinal involvement, then surgery alone renders five-year survival of 20%
        • Stage IIIB tumors are treated the same way unresectable IIIA cancers are treated, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For a select few patients postinduction chemoradiotherapy, surgery might be an option. The trials on the survival of patients with IIIB tumors also included inoperable IIIA tumors; therefore, the survival in IIIB patients is not known.

        Stage IV

        • Stage IV disease is considered incurable, and therapy is aimed at improving survival and alleviating symptoms. Only 10% to 30% of patients respond to chemotherapy, and only 1% to 3% survive 5 years after diagnosis. Single or double drug-based chemotherapy is offered to patients with functional performance status. There is a small survival benefit from chemotherapy.
        • In highly select patients, non-squamous NSCLC without brain metastasis or hemoptysis might benefit from the addition of bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor.

        Targeted therapy for NSCLC

        In the early 2000s, researchers discovered that specific mutations encode for proteins that are critical for cell growth and replication. These mutations were named “driver mutations.” It was proposed that blocking these mutation’s pathways may improve survival in lung cancer patients. The current practice is to check for the following mutations in every advanced NSCLC. Each of these mutations has a specific inhibitor available:

        • EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) is a mutation inhibited by tyrosine kinase inhibitors Erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib.
        • ALK (Anaplastic lymphoma kinase) includes the specific inhibitors crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. A structurally similar mutation is ROS-1. The FDA recently approved crizotinib for treating cancers expressing ROS-1 mutation.

        Immunotherapy for NSCLC

        • Immunotherapy, in a simple version, boost the immune system and helps the immune system recognize cancer cells as foreign and increase its responsiveness. There are several check-points to decrease autoimmunity and autodestruction of the body’s cells by the immune system. Malignant cells co-opt these check-points and create tolerance in the immune system. Of these check-points, programmed-death receptor 1 (PD-1) is of particular interest recently. PD-1 plays an important role in down-regulating T-cells and promotes self-tolerance. However, it also renders the immune system less effective against tumor cells. PD-1 interacts with two proteins: PD-L1 and PD-L2. This binding results in the inactivation of activated T-cells.

        At the moment, there are antibodies approved for PD-1 and its ligand, PD-L1 only. They inhibit the PD-1 receptor directly or bind to PD-L1 thus preventing it from inactivating the activated T-cell.

        Nivolumab

        • It is an IgG4 monoclonal antibody against PD-1. It is approved by the FDA for squamous and non-squamous NSCLC that has progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. It can be used in patients with high or low PD-L1 expression status.

        Pembrolizumab

        • It is also an IgG4 monoclonal antibody against PD-1. It is approved for pre-treated metastatic NSCLC with greater than 50% expression of PD-L1 and does not harbor EGFR and ALK mutations. It is also used in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin for metastatic non-squamous NSCLC with less than 50% expression of PD-L1.

        Atezolizumab

        • It is an IgG1 antibody against PD-L1. It is approved for use in metastatic, progressive NSCLC during or following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. It can be used in patients who express EGFR and ALK mutations and fail targeted therapy.

        Bevacizumab

        • It is not considered immune therapy. It is an anti-angiogenesis antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). It is primarily used in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of non-squamous NSCLC. It is contraindicated in squamous cell NSCLC due to the risk of severe and often fatal hemoptysis. It is also used to treat breast, renal, colon, and brain cancers.

        Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment

        • SCLC is very sensitive to chemotherapy, but unfortunately, has a very high recurrence rate. Treatment for SCLC is according to the stage of the disease.

        Treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

        • Stage I limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is lobectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. These include SCLC presenting as peripheral nodules without mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy. Care should be taken in completely ruling out lymph node involvement, and this is done by PET-CT followed by lymph node sampling by EBUS bronchoscopy or mediastinoscopy even if PET-CT was negative for lymph node size or FDG uptake.
        • LS-SCLC with mediastinal or hilar lymph node involvement is 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy. Radiation therapy is indicated to avoid recurrence since nearly 80% of SCLC will recur locally without radiation therapy. There are multiple approaches to treatment, including concurrent and alternate chemoradiotherapy or sequential treatments. Concurrent and alternative paths have slightly better outcomes, although they are more toxic than other approaches. Sequential therapy is much better tolerated.

        In patients who achieve remission, prophylactic whole brain radiation is also done. This significantly reduces symptomatic brain metastasis and increases overall survival.

        Treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

        • Extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) includes distant metastasis, malignant pleural or pericardial effusions, contralateral hilar, or supraclavicular lymph node involvement.
        • Treatment is with platinum-based chemotherapy. Up to 50% to 60% of patients show remission and should be offered radiation therapy followed by prophylactic whole-brain irradiation. Median survival from the time of diagnosis of ES-SCLC is only 8 to 13 months, and only about 5% of patients survive two years postdiagnosis.

        Staging

        Lung Cancer Staging

        • After the diagnosis of lung cancer, the most crucial step is to stage the disease because the state dictates treatment options, morbidity, and survival. It is of paramount importance that this is done with utmost vigilance. Staging is primarily done for NSCLC using the TNM classification. SCLC also can be staged in the same way, but a much more straightforward approach is used for limited disease and extensive disease.

        Tumor, node, metastasis staging of non-small cell lung cancer

        • Tumor (T), node (N), and metastasis (M) is an internationally accepted way of staging NSCLC. It is comprehensive in defining tumor size and extent, location, and distant spread which helps clinicians draw meaningful conclusions regarding the best treatment, avoid unnecessary surgeries and provide a timely referral to palliative care if the cure is not an option. .

        Tumor

        A primary tumor is divided into 5 categories, and each category is then further subdivided depending on the size, location and invasion of surrounding structures by the tumor.

        T0

        • No primary tumor
        • T Carcinoma in situ

        T1 (less than 3 cm)

        • T1mi: minimally invasive tumor
        • T1a: superficial tumor confined to central airways (tracheal or bronchial wall)
        • T1a: Less than 1 cm
        • T1b: Greater than 1 cm but less than 2cm
        • T1C: Greater than 2 cm but less than 3cm

        T2

        • T2: Greater than 3 cm but less than 5 cm
        • T2a: Greater than 3 cm but less than 4cm
        • T2b: Greater than 4 cm but less than 5cm
        • Also considered a T2 tumor if involving main bronchus but not carina, visceral pleura or causes atelectasis to the hilum

        T3

        • T3: Greater than 5 cm but less than 7 cm)
        • T3 Inv: invasion of the chest wall, pericardium or phrenic nerve
        • T3 Satell: separate tumor nodules in the same lobe
        • Also considered T3 tumor if involving the pericardium, phrenic nerve, chest wall or separate tumor nodules in the same lobe

        T4

        • T4: Greater than 7 cm)
        • T4inv: Invading above structures
        • T4Ipsi nod: Nodules in an ipsilateral lobe

        Also considered T4 tumor if involving heart, esophagus, trachea, carina, mediastinum, great vessels, recurrent laryngeal nerve, spine, or tumor nodules in the different ipsilateral lobe. The invasion of Diaphragm is now considered a T4 tumor as compared to a T3 tumor in the seventh edition of TNM classification25.

        Thoracic Lymph Nodes

        • Lung cancer staging also depends upon the extension of cancer to the lymph nodes corresponding to the primary tumor as well as the opposite hemithorax. It is extremely important to rule out lymph node metastasis before attempting curative surgery. Lung resection in itself carries high morbidity and mortality, therefore, should not be attempted if a cure is not possible.

        Historically, thoracic lymph nodes were first classified in the 1960s by Naruke. This map was accepted by North America, Europe, and Japan. Later, in the 1980s and early 90s, further refinements were made in response to better imaging and invasive testing improvements. Hence, two lymph node maps gained popularity in North America.

        • American thoracic society (ATS-Map)
        • American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). This was an adaptation of the Naruke map.

        In 1996, the differences in the above 2 were resolved in the form of Mountain-Dressler modification, MD-ATS Map. It was accepted in North America but only sporadically in Europe.

        The International Association of Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) attempted to resolve the differences between the MD-ATS map and the Naruke map. The IASLC lymph node map is now the most widely accepted lymph node classification system utilized all over the world.

        Thoracic lymph nodes can be divided into mediastinal or N2 and hilar or N1 lymph nodes. N2 nodes are more important because they differentiate in cancer stages and, therefore, treatment options.

        Much care has been taking in defining the N2 nodes in all the lymph node maps. We will attempt to explain the classification under the broad headings of Mediastinal and Hilar groups and then further explain the individual mediastinal stations as per IASLC map.

        Mediastinal Lymph Nodes

        They are subdivided into the following groups or stations:

        • Supraclavicular nodes, station 1
        • Superior mediastinal nodes, station 2 to 4
        • Aortic nodes, station 3
        • Inferior mediastinal lymph nodes, station 4

        Supraclavicular Nodes (Station 1)

        • It includes lower cervical, supraclavicular and sternal notch nodes. Lymph nodes are further divided into 1R and 1L corresponding to right and left the side of the body respectively. The distinction between 1R and 1L is an imaginary midline of trachea serves as the boundary. Below station 1, the left tracheal border is considered the boundary is differentiating between right and left-sided lymph nodes.

        Superior Mediastinal Lymph Nodes (Station 2 to 4)

        • These lymph nodes occupy the superior mediastinum, hence, named accordingly. They are further subdivided into the following groups:

        Upperparatracheall (station 2R and 2L)

        • 2R nodes extend to the left lateral border of the trachea.

        From the upper border of manubrium to the intersection of the caudal margin of the innominate (left brachiocephalic) vein with the trachea.

        • 2L nodes extend from the upper border of manubrium to the superior border of the aortic arch. 2L nodes are located to the left of the left lateral border of the trachea

        Pre-vascular (station 3A)

        • These nodes are not adjacent to the trachea like the nodes in station 2, but they are anterior to the vessels

        Pre-vertebral (station 3P)

        Nodes not adjacent to the trachea like the nodes in station 2, but behind the esophagus, which is pre-vertebral

        Lower para-tracheal (station 4R and 4L)

        • 4R nodes extend from the intersection of the caudal margin of the innominate (left brachiocephalic) vein with the trachea to the lower border of the azygos vein. 4R nodes extend from the right to the left lateral border of the trachea.
        • 4L nodes extend from the upper margin of the aortic arch to the upper rim of the left main pulmonary artery

        Aortic Lymph Nodes (5 and 6)

        This group includes:

        • Sub-aortic nodes (station 5)
        • These nodes are located lateral to the aorta and pulmonary trunk in the so-called AP window

        Para-aortic node (station 6)

        • These are ascending aorta or phrenic nodes lying anterior and lateral to the ascending aorta and the aortic arch

        Inferior Mediastinal Lymph Nodes (Station 7 to 9)

        • This group includes sub-carinal and para-esophageal nodes:

        Sub-carinal nodes (station 7)

        • They extend in a triangular fashion from the division of carina superiorly to the lower border of the bronchus intermedius on the right and the upper border of the lower lobe bronchus on the left.

        Para-esophageal nodes (station 8)

        •  These nodes are situated adjacent to the right and left the side of the esophageal wall. Both, stations 7 and eight are located below the carina.
        • Pulmonary Ligament (station 9) – They are located within the pulmonary ligaments extending from an inferior pulmonary vein up to the diaphragm.

        Hilar Lymph Nodes (Station 10 to 14)

        • These are all N1 nodes. These include nodes adjacent to the main stem bronchus and hilar vessels. On the right, they extend from the lower rim of the azygos vein to the interlobar region. On the left from the upper rim of the pulmonary artery to the inter-lobar region.

        Lymph Node Classification (N)

        N0: No lymph node involvement

        N1: Involvement of ipsilateral hilar nodes

        • N1a: single station N1 nodes
        • N1b: multiple-station N1 nodes

        N2: Involvement of mediastinal nodes

        • N2a1: Single station N2 nodes without N1 involvement (skip metastasis)
        • N2a2: Single station N2 nodes with N1 involvement
        • N2b: Multiple station N2 involvement

        N3: Involvement of contralateral mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes

        Metastasis (M)

        • M0: No distant metastasis
        • M1a: Malignant pleural / pericardial effusion or nodules
        • M1b: Single extra-thoracic metastasis
        • M2: Multiple extra-thoracic metastases

        Tumor Node Metastasis Staging of Lung Cancer

        Occult cancer: TX N0 M0

        Primary cancer not found. No lymph node or distant metastasis.

        Stage 0

        • T is N 0 M 0

        Stage I

        IA1

        • T1mi N 0 M 0
        • T1a  N 0 M 0

        IA2

        • T1b N 0 M 0

        IA3

        • T1c N 0 M 0

        IB

        • T2a N 0 M 0

        Stage II

        IIA

        • T2b N 0 M 0

        IIB

        • T1a / T1b / T1c N 1 M 0
        • T2a / T2b N 1 M 0
        • T3 N 0 M 0

        Stage III

        IIIA

        • T1a / T2b / T2c N 2 M 0
        • T2a / T2b N2 M 0
        • T3 N 1 M 0
        • T4 N 0 / N 1 M0

        IIIB

        • T1a / T1b / T1c N 3 M 0
        • T2a / T2b N 3 M0
        • T3 N 2 M 0
        • T4 N 2 M 0

        IIIC

        • T3 N 3 M 0
        • T4 N 3 M 0

        Stage IV

        IVA

        • Any T / Any N M1a or M1b

        IV B

        • Any T / Any N M1c

        Staging for all Small Cell Lung Cancer

        • SCLC staging can be done using the TNM system, but since SCLC is considered a systemic disease, a much more straightforward classification has been used successfully since the 1950s. There is a growing body of evidence that the TNM rating may be better in defining SCLC, but there is consensus on this approach yet.
        • SCLC is classified as LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC small cell based on the Veterans Affairs Lung study group (VALSG) classification.
        • LS-SCLC is confined to the ipsilateral hemithorax, and local lymph nodes, both mediastinal and hilar and supraclavicular nodes can be included in a single tolerable radiotherapy port (corresponding to TNM stages I through IIIB).
        • ES-SCLC has tumors beyond the boundaries of limited disease including distant metastases, malignant pericardial, or pleural effusions, and contralateral supraclavicular and contralateral hilar involvement.

        References

        ByRx Harun

        Pulmonary Emphysema – Causes, Symptoms, Treatment

        Pulmonary emphysema a progressive lung disease is a form of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Global Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) has defined COPD as “a common, preventable, and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation that is due to airway and/or alveolar abnormalities usually caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases.”

        There is no known, definitive treatment that can modify the disease process. However, risk-factor modification and management of symptoms have been proven effective in slowing the disease progression and optimizing the quality of living.

        Based on the symptoms and number of exacerbations, we can divide the disease into 4 COPD GOLD stages and modify the treatment accordingly.

        Symptoms of Pulmonary Emphysema

        Symptoms may be slightly different for each person. These are the most common:

        Early symptoms of pulmonary emphysema may include:

        • Cough
        • Rapid breathing
        • Shortness of breath, which gets worse with activity
        • Sputum production
        • Wheezing
        • Anxiety
        • Depression
        • Extreme tiredness (fatigue)
        • Heart problems
        • Over-inflation of the lungs
        • Sleep problems
        • Weight loss

        The symptoms of pulmonary emphysema may look like other lung conditions or health problems. See a healthcare provider for a diagnosis.

        Diagnosis of Pulmonary Emphysema

        Along with a complete health history and physical exam, your healthcare provider may do pulmonary function tests. These tests help measure the lungs’ ability to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide. The tests are often done with special machines into which you breathe. They may include:

        Spirometry

        A spirometer is a device used to check lung function. Spirometry is one of the simplest, most common tests. It may be used to:

        • Determine the severity of a lung disease
        • Find out if the lung disease is restrictive (decreased airflow) or obstructive (disruption of airflow)
        • Look for lung disease

        Peak flow monitoring

        This device measures how fast you can blow air out of your lungs. Cough, inflammation, and mucus buildup can cause the large airways in the lungs to slowly narrow. This slows the speed of air leaving the lungs. This measurement is very important in seeing how well or how poorly the disease is being controlled.

        Blood tests

        These are done to check the amount of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the blood. A blood test may be done to check eosinophil counts and vitamin D levels, and to monitor your hematocrit and hemoglobin levels for anemia.

        Chest X-ray

        This test takes pictures of internal tissues, bones, and organs. A chest X-ray is not recommended to diagnosis COPD, but can help identify other conditions.

        CT scan

        This test uses a combination of X-rays and computer technology to make images of the body. CT can show details such as the width of airways in the lungs and the thickness of airway walls.

        Sputum culture

        This test is done on the material that is coughed up from the lungs and into the mouth. A sputum culture is often used to see if an infection is present. It may also be done to check eosinophil levels.

        Electrocardiogram (ECG)

        This is a test that records the electrical activity of the heart, shows abnormal rhythms (arrhythmias), and can help find heart muscle damage.

        Treatment of Pulmonary Emphysema

        Medical Therapy

        • Medical therapy includes using a bronchodilator alone or in combination with anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

        Bronchodilator

        • The primary mechanisms of action can be divided into two categories: beta2 agonists and anticholinergic medications. They are first-line drugs for COPD and are administered by inhalation. They are known to improve FEV1 by altering the smooth muscle tone of the airways and thus improving exercise tolerance. Bronchodilators are usually given regularly to prevent and to reduce symptoms, exacerbations, and hospitalizations.
        • Short-acting beta2 agonists (SABA) and short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMA) are usually prescribed as needed for the management of intermittent dyspnea. Long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) are used, especially in cases of increasing dyspnea or more than occasional dyspnea. If the symptoms are persistent while on one bronchodilator, another bronchodilator should be added.
        • Beta2 agonists cause relaxation of airway smooth muscles. SABA, like albuterol, can be used with or without anticholinergics. SABA is the mainstay in COPD exacerbation. LABA includes formoterol, salmeterol, indacaterol, olodaterol, vilanterol, among others. The side effects are arrhythmias, tremors, and hypokalemia. Caution should be taken in heart failure as tachycardia may precipitate heart failure.
        • Anticholinergics inhibit acetyl-choline induced bronchoconstriction. SAMA includes ipratropium and oxitropium. LAMA, such as tiotropium, can be given once daily.

        Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) – is an add-on therapy to bronchodilator in a step-up therapy. ICS includes beclomethasone, budesonide, fluticasone, etc. The common side effects are local infection, cough, and pneumonia. Oral systemic corticosteroids are used for all patients with COPD exacerbation and avoided in stable patients due to more adverse effects.

        Oral Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors like roflumilast act by reducing inflammation and can be added if there is severe airflow obstruction with no improvement with the above medications.

        Triple inhaled therapy (LABA+ LAMA+ ICS) – has been recently approved by the FDA and is taken only once a day.

        Intravenous alpha1 antitrypsin augmentation therapy – for AATD patients. The high cost and lack of availability is the main limitation of this therapy.

        Supportive Therapy

        Supportive therapy includes oxygen therapy and ventilatory support, pulmonary rehabilitation, and palliative care.

        Routine supplemental oxygen – does not improve the quality of life or clinical outcomes in stable patients. Continuous long-term, i.e., longer than 15 hours of supplemental oxygen is recommended in patients with COPD with PaO2 less than 55 mmHg (or oxygen saturation less than 88%) or PaO2 less than 59 mm Hg in case of cor pulmonale. Oxygen therapy has shown to increase the survival of these patients with severe resting hypoxemia. For those who desaturate with exercise, intermittent oxygen will help. The goal is to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 90%.

        A major cause of hypoxemia in COPD is due to ventilation-perfusion mismatch (V/Q Mismatch), particularly in low V/Q areas. Hypoxic vasoconstriction of pulmonary arteries is to improve overall gas exchange efficiency. Supplemental oxygen can successfully reach the alveoli in these lungs, which prevents this vasoconstriction and thereby increases perfusion and improves gas exchange, thus resulting in improvement of hypoxemia.

        Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) – is known to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure. It should be tried as the first mode of ventilation in patients with COPD exacerbation with respiratory failure who otherwise have no absolute contraindication as it improves gas exchange, decreases hospitalization duration, reduces work of breathing, improves VQ matching, and improves survival. If NPPV does not work in a patient with COPD in a hospital setting, then the patient should be intubated and put on a ventilator.

        Pulmonary rehabilitation – for patients with severe symptoms and multiple exacerbations reduces dyspnea and hospitalizations and is recommended for GOLD stages B, C, and D.

        Interventional Therapy

        • Lung volume reduction surgery reduces hyperinflation and improves elastic recoil
        • Lung transplantation when FEV1 and or DLCO is less than 20%.

        Additional Interventions

        • Identification and reduction of exposure to risk factors. Counseling about smoking cessation is the single most important intervention that slows the progression of the disease. Reducing the exposure to open cooking fires and promoting efficient ventilation also benefits.
        • Daily oral opioids for severe COPD symptoms refractory to medical therapy. Nutritional supplementation in malnourished patients with COPD
        • Pneumococcal vaccine 23 valent every five years for patients with COPD  older than 65 or with other cardiopulmonary disease and Influenza vaccine for all patients with COPD every year
        • Readmission rates can be reduced with counseling on the optimal use of metered-dose inhalers (MDI)
        • Exercise for all patients with COPD

        Management of a Patient with COPD Exacerbation

        Beta-blockers and anticholinergics are used simultaneously. Initially with nebulizers and later switched to MDI. Systemic corticosteroids (intravenous or oral) shown to hasten recovery and decrease hospital stay. Antibiotics are beneficial, especially if a cough productive of purulent sputum is present. Second generation macrolides, extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and amoxicillin-clavulanate. NIPPV can be beneficial in patients who can protect their airway and does not have a major acid-base disorder on the ABG. Very often, patients with end-stage COPD with exacerbations are intubated and are put on a ventilator. Ventilated patients should be watched for the development of auto-PEEP and its related complications.

        Prevention

        • Smoking cessation
        • Vaccination against Pneumococcus and Haemophilus Influenzae.

        Complications

        Patients suffering from emphysema are prone to develop various complications, some of which are life-threatening. Following are some most frequently encountered complications of emphysema:

        • Respiratory insufficiency or failure
        • Pneumonia
        • Pneumothorax
        • Chronic atelectasis
        • Cor pulmonale
        • Interstitial emphysema
        • Recurrent respiratory tract infections
        • Respiratory acidosis, hypoxia, and coma

        References

        ByRx Harun

        Viral Pneumonia – Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment

        Viral pneumonia is defined as a disease entity wherein there is the viral causation of oxygen and carbon dioxide gas exchange abnormalities at the level of the alveoli, secondary to viral-mediated and/or immune response-mediated inflammation. The traditional role of viral pneumonia was as a disease found predominantly in the very young, the elderly, and those exposed to influenza. In the past, the diagnosis of viral pneumonia was predicated on it being somewhat a diagnosis of exclusion. History, physical exam, chest radiography, and available lab work (until recently) lacked sensitivity and specificity. Once bacterial pneumonia has been excluded, then viral pneumonia diagnosis was entertained.

        Traditionally, the treatment of viral pneumonia revolved around supportive care:

        • Supplemental oxygen when indicated
        • Airway augmentation as appropriate
        • Monitoring of and replacement of any fluid deficits
        • Symptomatic control of temperature and cough
        • Rest to reduce oxygen demand
        • Treatment of any comorbidities and/or concomitant bacterial pneumonia

        The concepts of diagnosis, prevalence, clinical role, and treatment of viral pneumonia are in flux for several reasons.

        1. There is a growing population at increased risk of viral pneumonia:

        • The increases in life span and early infant survivability have created an additional population at greater risk of viral pneumonia.
        • The increased number of those receiving immune-impairing therapy (radiation and/or chemotherapy) for cancer.
        • The increased use of disease-modifying hematological/immunological agents in chronic illness, resulting in secondary impaired immunity.
        • The advent of HIV
        • The increase in the number of patients with inborn immune impairment serving bacterial infection secondary to antibiotic therapy.
        • The increased incidence of organ transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy.

        2. The availability of sensitive, specific, real-time-result-available testing for viral entities:

        • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology is replacing viral cultures and serial viral antigen titers. Both viral culture results and serial antigen testing were problematic because test results were not available until weeks after the acute illness, and viral culturing for pneumonia could involve invasive sampling techniques to acquire.
        • The availability of PCR testing has resulted in increased testing in general.
        • The mechanism of PCR itself is more sensitive and specific because many viruses are notoriously difficult to grow in culture and are very sample dependent.

        3. The positive feedback loop that results from improved viral pneumonia testing modalities:

        • The test availability results in an increased number of diagnoses.
        • The increased number of diagnosis raises the clinical index of suspicion for the entity.
        • The increased clinical index of suspicion raises the number of tests ordered.

        4. The availability of safe, tolerable, and somewhat specific antiviral therapies:

        • Prior viral pneumonia treatment was essentially supportive measures only.
        • Initial efforts at antiviral therapy were not well tolerated.
        • The availability of some specific and effective treatments now spur earlier testing and a greater appreciation of the role of viral infection in pneumonia.
        • Disease-modifying therapy for HIV is now available.

        5. The increasing role of viral pathogens in pneumonia and the increased realization of the role of bacterial and viral co-infection necessitate a higher clinical index of suspicion and early identification of viral pulmonary pathogens. Counterbalance seeing this new clinical burden is the availability of the following:

        • Enhanced laboratory detection via ELISA and PCR testing modalities
        • Enhanced radiographic detection for a high thin section CAT scan
        • An increasing number of safe and efficacious antiviral drugs
        • Increased recognition of the role of prevention in viral infectious disease.

        Causes of Viral Pneumonia

        As pneumonia can be considered somewhat a final common pathway of infection, especially for those who are immune-compromised, a great number of viruses can cause pneumonia. In general, these viruses can be divided into those containing DNA or RNA as their nucleic acid. As this is a bit of an artificial division, a more meaningful approach to etiology is to define by clinical syndromes produced and demographics affected.

        Etiologies of Viral Influenza

        Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

        • RNA virus
        • RSV is the most common cause of viral pneumonia in small children and infants.

        Rhinovirus

        • RNA
        • Rhinovirus is the most common cause of upper respiratory tract infection across all age groups, although it is not as commonly represented as a cause of viral pneumonia.

        Influenza A, B and C viruses

        • RNA
        • Influenza A is the greatest cause of mortality and morbidity among the viral types of pneumonia.
        • There are multiple subtypes of Influenza A.  Two particularly concerning subtypes to be aware of are the avian flu (H5N1)and swine flu (H1N1).

        Human metapneumovirus

        • RNA
        • Human Metapneumovirus is a novel viral pathogen that is increasingly recognized as a cause of viral pneumonia and is implicated as the cause of the SARS outbreak.

        Parainfluenza viruses type 1, 2, 3, and 4

        • RNA
        • Parainfluenza virus has multiple serotypes and is most commonly associated with pneumonia-like illness in young children seasonally. Spring and fall predominate.

        Human bocavirusCoronavirus

        • RNA
        • Coronal viruses are already viruses that cause pneumonia, typically in immune incompetent people.
        • However, one subtype of coronavirus is the virus causing Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome, and another has been implicated in severe acute respiratory syndrome.

        Adenovirus

        • DNA
        • Adenovirus most commonly causes pneumonia in people with solid organ transplantation or hematological transplantation

        Enteroviruses

        • RNA
        • Enteroviruses, although common causes of polio, gastrointestinal, and upper respiratory tract syndromes, are less common causes of viral pneumonia.

        Varicella-zoster virus

        • DNA
        • Varicella-zoster virus is associated with both chickenpox and shingles and may cause severe types of pneumonia, particularly in non-immune pregnant women, non-gravid-adults with chickenpox. It is a fairly common cause of pneumonia in people with HIV post-shingles outbreak

        Hantavirus

        • RNA
        • Hantavirus is a zoonotic viral pathogen that emerged in the American Southwest and is associated with rodent feces exposure.
        • Hantavirus pneumonia is associated with frequent rapid respiratory failure and cardiovascular collapse.

        ParechovirusesEpstein-Barr virus (EBV)

        • DNA
        • Epstein-Barr virus, although commonly implicated in mono-like syndromes, can be rarely associated with viral pneumonia. The majority of which occur in people with hematological dyscrasias.

        Human herpesvirus 6 and 7

        • DNA

        Herpes simplex virus

        • DNA
        • HSV I and II are both associated with viral pneumonia in immune-compromised patients, including those with HIV, solid organ transplantation, and hematopoietic transplantation.

        Minimi virusCytomegalovirus (CMV)

        • DNA
        • CMV is a significant cause of pneumonia in HIV-infected patients with a CD4 count less than 100 cells per millimeter squared.
        • CMV is also frequently implicated in pneumonia in recipients of solid organ transplant and hematopoietic transplant.

        Measles

        • RNA
        • A childhood exanthemata’s illness that, although less common in the industrialized world secondary to vaccination, remains a major contributor to worldwide childhood mortality secondary to viral pneumonia as a sequela.

        Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (Coronavirus)

        • RNA
        • A subset of the coronavirus associated with severe pneumonia. This was first observed in the Middle East and had an initial mortality rate of 30%.

        Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (Metapneumovirus)

        • RNA
        • A subset of Coronavirus causing life-threatening pneumonia

        Pathophysiology of Viral Pneumonia

        On a macroscopic level, viral pneumonia can occur through one of three mechanisms:

        • Direct inoculation of viral particle into the lung (e.g., RSV or influenza)
        • Spread in a contiguous fashion from viral infections near the upper respiratory tract (e.g., measles)
        • Hematogenous spread from a distant viral infection (e.g., CMV)

        On a microscopic level, the general pattern of viral pneumonia pathogenesis is as follows. Note that individual viral species causing pneumonia will have some variation from this scheme.

        • The target cell is the pneumocyte with resultant alveolar damage.
        • The submucosa of the alveoli is targeted, causing inflammation and secondary edema, microhemorrhage, and cellular immune reaction.
        • The cellular reaction consists of mononuclear lymphocytes and progresses to PMNs recruitment.
        • Fibrin is released.
        • Both CD4 and CD8 cells are involved, beginning a cascade of immune product secretion that can end in increased vascular permeability and resultant edema.
        • This process may lead to intra-alveolar organization and an obliterans clinical picture.
        • The far end of the spectrum of the process includes interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock.

        Diagnosis of Viral Pneumonia

        There are no pathognomonic history cues for the diagnosis of viral pneumonia as opposed to bacterial pneumonia. However, cues are suggestive in the differential diagnosis of viral pneumonia:

        • Gradual onset as opposed to the sudden onset of symptoms.
        • Lower temperature
        • Lack of purulent sputum
        • History of immunosuppression
        • Prodromal viral upper respiratory tract illness
        • History of HIV
        • History of solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic transplantation
        • History of neoplasm
        • Concomitant flu symptoms
        • Concomitant gastrointestinal symptoms

        There are no pathognomonic physical examination findings for the diagnosis of viral pneumonia as opposed to bacterial pneumonia. However, physical findings are suggestive in the differential diagnosis of viral pneumonia:

        • Tachycardia or tachypnea out of proportion to the temperature
        • Temperature elevation disproportionately low to the level of debility
        • Concomitant upper respiratory tract infection
        • Rash
        • The paucity of physical findings on pulmonary exam disproportionate to the level of debility
        • Bilateral positive lung findings

        As noted above, both history and physical examination may provide few diagnostic cues as to the etiology of pneumonia (bacterial versus virus). With the existence of specific effective treatment modalities, diagnoses of and identification of viruses causing pneumonia is of increased importance. Fortunately, the diagnostic acuity of laboratory examination in combination with radiography and history and physical examination has progressed.

        Laboratory Examination CBC with differential – There are no absolute diagnostic findings as viral pneumonia may result in elevated, normal, or decreased WBC counts. However, viral etiology is less commonly associated with elevated WBC and “left shifts” of the differential than bacterial types of pneumonia.

        Chemistry panel – Useful for gauging the degree of dehydration, relative renal dysfunction, and dosing of renal excreted medications

        C-reactive protein – As a reactive phase reactant, the CRP level may be elevated with viral pneumonia, although this is not a specific or sensitive finding.

        ELISA – rapid antigen tests – ELISA tests allow real-time data for a number of viral pneumonia pathogens. Commonly available ELISA tests include the following:

        • Herpes simplex virus (HSV)
        • Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
        • Influenza A and B
        • Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

        A caveat is that many viruses may be detected via ELISA in the presence of other known bacterial pathogens, and in some cases, the detection of a viral pathogen does not always indicate active disease.

        Gene amplification – First and second-generation PCR testing exists and may allow viral pneumonia etiology diagnosis within clinically relevant timing.  Clinically available tests using PCR methodology include the following:

        • CMV
        • RSV
        • HPV
        • Coronal viruses

        Cytological evaluation – No single cytological evaluation of patient tissue cells is entirely diagnostic for viral pneumonia. However, the generalization can be made that DNA viruses typically produce intra-nuclear inclusions, and RNA viruses typically produce cytoplasmic inclusions.

        Viral culture – Although viral cultures are the gold standard for the final diagnosis of viral pneumonia, there are limitations such as the following:

        • Viral cultures are routinely not available for 10 to 15 days, which limits them for acute clinical care decisions.
        • The cultures are very dependent on obtaining a valid specimen.
        • The success of delivering a viable specimen to the lab varies as many of the viruses have very specific transport requirements.
        • The fastidious nature of some viral pathogens limits the validity of a negative culture result.

        Viral antigens serology – The great majority of the viral entities involved in viral pneumonia have serological markers that can be obtained in the tract. Diagnostic problems include positive serology obtained for people with chronic viral infections that are not a factor in the presence of pneumonia and the limited use in acute treatment and decision making of viral pneumonia.

        Chest x-ray – As there is a tremendous overlap in findings on chest x-ray with both bacterial pneumonia and viral pneumonia, no one finding or set of findings is pathognomonic.

        Features that are suggestive of bacterial pneumonia include the following:

        • Alveolar infiltrates
        • Lobar consolidation
        • Nodular densities
        • Pleural effusion

        Features that are more suggestive of viral pneumonia include the following:

        • Interstitial infiltrates
        • Patchy distribution of interstitial infiltrates
        • Bilateral infiltrates
        • Pneumonia-like syndrome with an unremarkable chest x-ray

        Chest CT scan – The advent of thin-section CT scan has revolutionized the radiographic diagnosis of viral pneumonia. It has been observed, particularly in cases of viral pneumonia-like clinical presentation and normal chest radiography, thin-section CT scan will be positive for parenchymal defects and aid in diagnosis.

        Treatment / Management

        The cornerstone of treatment of viral pneumonia consists of the following:

        Supportive Care

        • The first priority of supportive care is to maintain oxygenation as needed. This may entail nasal cannula, noninvasive airway, or mechanical ventilation.
        • The second priority of supportive care is to maintain hydration either via supervised oral intake or intravenous fluids.
        • The third priority of supportive care is to maintain rest and decrease oxygen demand.
        • A final priority of supportive care is to meet the increased calorie needs of the patient, secondary to the increased respiratory effort.

        Management of Comorbid Illnesses Appropriate treatment of Coexisting Bacterial Types of Pneumonia

        Most current evidence indicates the frequent existence of concomitant bacterial types of pneumonia. The prototypical example is the observation that the majority of mortality during the 1917-1918 influenza pandemic was secondary to bacterial pneumonia, superimposed on the initial influenza pneumonia.

        Specific antiviral therapy for a number of viral pneumonia exists as does preventative or prophylactic therapies for those at high risk would have been exposed:

        Influenza virus

        • Treatment: Oseltamivir or peramivir or zanamivir
        • Prophylaxis: Influenza vaccine and/or chemoprophylaxis with zanamivir or oseltamivir

        Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

        • Treatment: Ribavirin
        • Prophylaxis: RSV immunoglobulin and/or palivizumab

        Parainfluenza virus

        • Treatment: Ribavirin
        • Prophylaxis: Not available

        Herpes simplex virus (HSV)

        • Treatment: Acyclovir
        • Prophylaxis: Not available

        Adenovirus

        • Treatment: Ribavirin
        • Prophylaxis: Not available

        Measles virus

        • Treatment: Ribavirin
        • Prophylaxis: intravenous immunoglobulin

        Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

        • Treatment: Ganciclovir or foscarnet
        • Prophylaxis: intravenous immunoglobulin

        Varicella-zoster virus (VZ)

        • Treatment: Acyclovir
        • Prophylaxis: Varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG)

        References

        Translate »